Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

hallo Greg

  5.18.7-rc1

compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de


Thanks

Ronald

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 22:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.18.7-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.18.y
* git commit: 1fbbb68b1ca97c9e8393fe69df86b23e79f81d05
* git describe: v5.18.5-154-g1fbbb68b1ca9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.5-154-g1fbbb68b1ca9

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.5-142-g1cf3647a86ad)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.5-142-g1cf3647a86ad)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.5-142-g1cf3647a86ad)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.5-142-g1cf3647a86ad)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 128467, pass: 116814, fail: 682, skip: 10271, xfail: 700

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 314 total, 314 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kunit/15
* kunit/261
* kunit/3
* kunit/427
* kunit/90
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* lt[
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Justin Forbes]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.

Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

5.18.7-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220621):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1382
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1387
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1390

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:45:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.18:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    28 boots:	28 pass, 0 fail
    130 tests:	130 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.18.7-rc1-g1fbbb68b1ca9
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm (multi_v7_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0,
armv7 with neon FPU) and arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Fenil Jain]

Hey Greg,

Ran tests and boot tested on my system, no regression found

Tested-by: Fenil Jain <fkjainco@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 6/23/22 9:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 6/23/22 10:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Zan Aziz]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:51 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg

./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run

     Total time: 0.428 [sec]

# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes

     Total time: 6.844 [sec]

       6.844414 usecs/op
         146104 ops/sec

Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>

Thanks
-Zan

Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/23/22 09:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

[PATCH 5.18 00/11] 5.18.7-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.7 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.7-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.18.7-rc1

Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
    dt-bindings: nvmem: sfp: Add clock properties

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
    selftests/bpf: Add selftest for calling global functions from freplace

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
    bpf: Fix calling global functions from BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT programs

Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
    fsnotify: consistent behavior for parent not watching children

Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
    fsnotify: introduce mark type iterator

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
    x86/boot: Wrap literal addresses in absolute_pointer()

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
    net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check

Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz>
    eth: sun: cassini: remove dead code

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
    wifi: rtlwifi: remove always-true condition pointed out by GCC 12

Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
    zonefs: fix zonefs_iomap_begin() for reads

Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
    s390/mm: use non-quiescing sske for KVM switch to keyed guest


-------------

Diffstat:

 .../bindings/nvmem/fsl,layerscape-sfp.yaml         | 14 ++++
 Makefile                                           |  4 +-
 arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c                             |  2 +-
 arch/x86/boot/boot.h                               | 36 ++++++---
 arch/x86/boot/main.c                               |  2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/sun/cassini.c                 |  4 +-
 .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c   |  5 +-
 drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c      | 10 ---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c                      | 24 ++----
 fs/notify/fsnotify.c                               | 85 +++++++++----------
 fs/zonefs/super.c                                  | 94 +++++++++++++++-------
 include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h                   | 31 +++++--
 kernel/bpf/btf.c                                   |  4 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c       | 14 ++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/freplace_global_func.c     | 18 +++++
 15 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)