All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, haojian.zhuang@linaro.org,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] ARM: remove extra timer-sp control register clearing
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:36:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514BC39F.6050209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321192322.GR4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 03/21/2013 02:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:54:02PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>
>> The timer-sp initialization code clears the control register before
>> initializing the timers, so every platform doing this is redundant.
>>
>> For unused timers, we should not care what state they are in.
> 
> NAK.  We do care what state they're in.  What if they have their interrupt
> enable bit set, and IRQ is shared with the clock event timer?
> 
> No, this patch is just wrong.

Okay, I can have the timer init function clear the register in the case
that even when the timer is unused.

Rob


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] ARM: remove extra timer-sp control register clearing
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:36:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514BC39F.6050209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321192322.GR4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 03/21/2013 02:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:54:02PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>
>> The timer-sp initialization code clears the control register before
>> initializing the timers, so every platform doing this is redundant.
>>
>> For unused timers, we should not care what state they are in.
> 
> NAK.  We do care what state they're in.  What if they have their interrupt
> enable bit set, and IRQ is shared with the clock event timer?
> 
> No, this patch is just wrong.

Okay, I can have the timer init function clear the register in the case
that even when the timer is unused.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-20 22:54 [PATCH 00/11] sp804 and integrator timer CLKSRC_OF support Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 01/11] OF: add empty of_device_is_available for !OF Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 14:18   ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 14:18     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 14:18     ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 14:26     ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 14:26       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 14:26       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: remove extra timer-sp control register clearing Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 17:58   ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 17:58     ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 18:03     ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 18:03       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 18:03       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 19:23     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-22  2:36     ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-03-22  2:36       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: timer-sp: convert to use CLKSRC_OF init Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 18:02   ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 18:02     ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 19:35   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 19:35     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 19:35     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-22  2:31     ` Rob Herring
2013-03-22  2:31       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-22  2:31       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-22 11:49       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-22 11:49         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: highbank: use OF init for sp804 timer Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: vexpress: remove sp804 OF init Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: dts: vexpress: disable CA9 core tile sp804 timer Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: versatile: add versatile dtbs to dtbs target Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: versatile: use OF init for sp804 timer Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: integrator-cp: convert use CLKSRC_OF for timer init Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 18:07   ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 18:07     ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: move sp804 and integrator timers to drivers/clocksource Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 18:15   ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 18:15     ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-21 18:15     ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 11/11] devtree: add binding documentation for sp804 Rob Herring
2013-03-20 22:54   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 19:36   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 19:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 19:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-21 13:24 ` [PATCH 00/11] sp804 and integrator timer CLKSRC_OF support Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-21 13:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-21 13:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-21 14:06   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 14:06     ` Rob Herring
2013-03-21 14:06     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514BC39F.6050209@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.