Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Prabhakar Lad]

Hi Mauro,

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review at
> Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>.
> Each patch is represented by its submission date, the subject (up to 70
> chars) and the patchwork link (if submitted via email).
>
> P.S.: This email is c/c to the developers where some action is expected.
>       If you were copied, please review the patches, acking/nacking or
>       submitting an update.
>
> It took me a lot of time to handle patches this time. The good news is that
> there's just one patch without an owner.
>

[Snip]

>
>                 == Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@ti.com> ==
>
> Oct,24 2012: [media] vpif_display: fix return value check in vpif_reqbufs()         http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15167  Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>
This patch can be marked as 'Superseded'.

Regards,
--Prabhakar

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Marek Szyprowski]

Hello,

On 3/24/2013 7:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review at
> Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>.
> Each patch is represented by its submission date, the subject (up to 70
> chars) and the patchwork link (if submitted via email).
>
> P.S.: This email is c/c to the developers where some action is expected.
>        If you were copied, please review the patches, acking/nacking or
>        submitting an update.
>
> It took me a lot of time to handle patches this time. The good news is that
> there's just one patch without an owner.
>
...

> 		== Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> ==
>
> Nov,12 2012: [media] videobuf2-core: print current state of buffer in vb2_buffer_do http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15420  Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>

This one is ok. I acked it by gmane interface as I don't have original 
mail, I have no

> Mar, 5 2013: [media] dma-mapping: enable no mmu support in dma_common_mmap          http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17112  Scott Jiang <scott.jiang.linux@gmail.com>

IMHO this one is RFC. I would like to get some more explanation why it 
is needed and how it will be used.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Mauro,

On Sunday 24 March 2013 15:11:11 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review at
> Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>.
> Each patch is represented by its submission date, the subject (up to 70
> chars) and the patchwork link (if submitted via email).
> 
> P.S.: This email is c/c to the developers where some action is expected.
>       If you were copied, please review the patches, acking/nacking or
>       submitting an update.

[snip]

> 		== Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> ==
> 
> Dec,12 2012: [v2] ad5820: Voice coil motor controller driver                
>        http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15881
>        Florian Neuhaus <florian.neuhaus@reberinformatik.ch>

Thanks for the reminder, I'll review that one.

> Jan, 4 2013: omap3isp: Add support for interlaced input data
>        http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16133 
>        William Swanson <william.swanson@fuel7.com>
> Jan,14 2013: omap3isp: Add support for interlaced input data
>        http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16255
>        William Swanson <william.swanson@fuel7.com>

I've recently received hardware to test interlaced video with the OMAP3 ISP, 
I'll work on this.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

On 03/24/2013 07:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review at
> Linux Media Mailing List<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>.
> Each patch is represented by its submission date, the subject (up to 70
> chars) and the patchwork link (if submitted via email).
>
> P.S.: This email is c/c to the developers where some action is expected.
>        If you were copied, please review the patches, acking/nacking or
>        submitting an update.
>
> It took me a lot of time to handle patches this time. The good news is that
> there's just one patch without an owner.
>
> This patch is there on the pile for a long time. I was actually expecting
> that either Jarod or David could review it, as it can affect existing
> NEC devices:
[...]
> 		== Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>  ==
>
> Jan, 6 2013: s5p-tv: mixer: fix handling of VIDIOC_S_FMT
http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16143  Tomasz 
Stanislawski<t.stanislaws@samsung.com>

 From my side I can't see any applications this patch could cause issues to.
And it actually breaks some applications to not have this patch applied.
Hence we keep it applied internally. I will likely not be able to address
the issue at V4L2 API that some applications rely on drivers returning
-EINVAL on an attempt to set unsupported format. I don't have an idea what
to do with that at the moment :) I would say it is safe to apply this 
patch.
But if you have concerns please ignore it. Or let's leave it in current 
state.

Regards,
Sylwester

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Hans Verkuil]

On Sun March 24 2013 19:11:11 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> 		== Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com> == 
> 
> Mar,14 2013: [review] radio-mr800: move clamp_t check inside amradio_set_freq()     http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17380  Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>

Acked patch.

Regards,

	Hans

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

Hi Mauro

On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

> 		== Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> == 
> 
> I suspect that some of the above may be obsoleted:
> 
> Nov,13 2012: sh_vou: Move from videobuf to videobuf2                                http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15433  Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

dropped for now

> Nov,16 2012: [05/14,media] atmel-isi: Update error check for unsigned variables     http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15475  Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>

I was unsure about the above, and then it rolled under the carpet 
somehow... I think, I'll just apply it.

> Jan, 3 2013: [1/3] sh_vou: Don't modify const variable in sh_vou_s_crop()           http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16095  Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Superseded by "[media] media: sh_vou: fix const cropping related warnings"

> Mar,18 2013: [v2] soc_camera: Add RGB666 & RGB888 formats                           http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17407  phil.edworthy@renesas.com

An updated version is under review

> Mar,14 2013: [v2,1/8] drivers: media: use module_platform_driver_probe()            http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17378  Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>

scheduled for the second soc-camera 3.10 batch

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Michael Krufky]

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>                 == Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org> ==
>
> Michael promised to review and apply them on his tree, sending me a pull
> request, but this never happened. Mike, did you see any issues on those
> patches?


Apologies, the year 2013 has had me busier than ever.  I didn't get to
my patch queue as early as I had expected.  I'll get these reviewed,
tested & pushed to a repository and send you a merge request ASAP.

I'll try very hard to get this done in the coming week.

Best regards,

Mike

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Guennadi,

On Friday 29 March 2013 16:13:41 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Mauro
> 
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > 		== Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> ==
> > 
> > I suspect that some of the above may be obsoleted:
> > 
> > Nov,13 2012: sh_vou: Move from videobuf to videobuf2                      
> >          http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15433  Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> dropped for now

As Renesas doesn't seem to be interested in maintaining the sh-vou driver, 
should it be marked as 'Odd Fixes' in the MAINTAINERS file ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Manu Abraham]

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is the summary of the patches that are currently under review at
> Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> Manu,
>
> Yet another patch adding IR support for mantis. It seems that this is
> is a long waited feature, as from time to time, people send patches fixing it.
> Please test and apply it, or otherwise fix and send us a patch properly
> implementing support for it.
>
> Feb, 7 2013: [media] mantis: add remote control support                             http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16732  Jan Klötzke <jan@kloetzke.net>

I will look into it after these two weeks. Just tied up these two weeks.

Regards,
Manu

Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (32 patches)

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Friday 29 March 2013 16:13:41 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Mauro
> > 
> > On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > 		== Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> ==
> > > 
> > > I suspect that some of the above may be obsoleted:
> > > 
> > > Nov,13 2012: sh_vou: Move from videobuf to videobuf2                      
> > >          http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/15433  Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > dropped for now
> 
> As Renesas doesn't seem to be interested in maintaining the sh-vou driver, 
> should it be marked as 'Odd Fixes' in the MAINTAINERS file ?

I wouldn't nak such a patch ;-)

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/