All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:29:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51636F0D.5060000@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364553360.5053.84.camel@laptop>

Hi Ingo,

Any chance for this patchset and the other one to be queued for 3.10?

Both of them has been acked by Peter.

On 2013/3/29 18:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:43 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag.
>>
>> The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and
>> cpuacct_account_field() can
>> be called when cpuacct hasn't been initialized during system bootup.
>>
>> This patch initializes cpuacct earlier, and the result is we don't
>> have
>> to check the flag in scheduler hot path.
>>
>> Note, this patchset is based on "[PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Split cpuacct"
>>
>>         http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/1
>>
>> 0001-cpuacct-allocate-per_cpu-cpuusage-for-root-cpuacct-s.patch
>> 0002-cpuacct-Initialize-root-cpuacct-earlier.patch
>> 0003-cpuacct-Initialize-cpuacct-subsystem-earlier.patch
>> 0004-cpuacct-No-need-to-check-subsys-active-state.patch
>> 0005-cgroup-Remove-subsys.active-flag.patch
> 
> 
> Seems sane enough
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:29:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51636F0D.5060000@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364553360.5053.84.camel@laptop>

Hi Ingo,

Any chance for this patchset and the other one to be queued for 3.10?

Both of them has been acked by Peter.

On 2013/3/29 18:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 14:43 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag.
>>
>> The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and
>> cpuacct_account_field() can
>> be called when cpuacct hasn't been initialized during system bootup.
>>
>> This patch initializes cpuacct earlier, and the result is we don't
>> have
>> to check the flag in scheduler hot path.
>>
>> Note, this patchset is based on "[PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Split cpuacct"
>>
>>         http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/1
>>
>> 0001-cpuacct-allocate-per_cpu-cpuusage-for-root-cpuacct-s.patch
>> 0002-cpuacct-Initialize-root-cpuacct-earlier.patch
>> 0003-cpuacct-Initialize-cpuacct-subsystem-earlier.patch
>> 0004-cpuacct-No-need-to-check-subsys-active-state.patch
>> 0005-cgroup-Remove-subsys.active-flag.patch
> 
> 
> Seems sane enough
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29  6:43 [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:43 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cpuacct: allocate per_cpu cpuusage for root cpuacct statically Li Zefan
2013-04-10 13:44   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpuacct: Allocate " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cpuacct: Initialize root cpuacct earlier Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44   ` Li Zefan
2013-04-10 13:46   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpuacct: " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cpuacct: Initialize cpuacct subsystem earlier Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44   ` Li Zefan
2013-04-10 13:47   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpuacct: " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpuacct: No need to check subsys active state Li Zefan
2013-04-10 13:48   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpuacct: " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2013-03-29  6:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cgroup: Kill subsys.active flag Li Zefan
2013-04-10 13:49   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2013-03-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Kill cgroup_subsys.active Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-29 10:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09  1:29   ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-04-09  1:29     ` Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51636F0D.5060000@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.