From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Cc: Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Regression in 3.9 caused by "bridge: respect RFC2863 operational state" Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 23:06:16 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <518183C8.8050606@openwrt.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAOaVG179Rx_JfV99mbjWhwQTALb5gh+2_WVFWDSbngA0qkzoGw@mail.gmail.com> On 2013-05-01 10:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > What about using AF_PACKET bound to underlying wireless device and the > packet type. You can even use BPF to filter. As far as I know, AF_PACKET only works when not binding it to the packet type (otherwise it get stolen by the rx handler). Not binding it to the packet type and using BPF to filter is expensive on small embedded devices with small caches. Still, this requires userspace changes, so we need a different solution. > Another alternative would be to have bridge accept control frames on > dormant device but not send. Sounds good, will you send a patch for that? - Felix
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen-OTpzqLSitTUnbdJkjeBofR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> Cc: Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall-t37Kgv3TaIPQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>, netdev <netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: Regression in 3.9 caused by "bridge: respect RFC2863 operational state" Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 23:06:16 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <518183C8.8050606@openwrt.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAOaVG179Rx_JfV99mbjWhwQTALb5gh+2_WVFWDSbngA0qkzoGw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> On 2013-05-01 10:21 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > What about using AF_PACKET bound to underlying wireless device and the > packet type. You can even use BPF to filter. As far as I know, AF_PACKET only works when not binding it to the packet type (otherwise it get stolen by the rx handler). Not binding it to the packet type and using BPF to filter is expensive on small embedded devices with small caches. Still, this requires userspace changes, so we need a different solution. > Another alternative would be to have bridge accept control frames on > dormant device but not send. Sounds good, will you send a patch for that? - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 21:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-05-01 19:02 Regression in 3.9 caused by "bridge: respect RFC2863 operational state" Felix Fietkau 2013-05-01 19:49 ` Krishna Chaitanya 2013-05-01 19:49 ` Krishna Chaitanya [not found] ` <CAOaVG179Rx_JfV99mbjWhwQTALb5gh+2_WVFWDSbngA0qkzoGw@mail.gmail.com> 2013-05-01 21:06 ` Felix Fietkau [this message] 2013-05-01 21:06 ` Felix Fietkau 2013-05-01 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger 2013-05-01 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger 2013-05-02 0:53 ` Felix Fietkau 2013-05-02 0:53 ` Felix Fietkau [not found] <CAFuUQkhHsRZMnNYBbVZU0=BcAKMEktzYgPv6oc=CMFd7MFDi6g@mail.gmail.com> 2015-12-04 2:31 ` YanBo 2016-01-19 15:45 ` Shajakhan, Mohammed Shafi (Mohammed Shafi) 2016-01-19 15:45 ` Shajakhan, Mohammed Shafi (Mohammed Shafi) 2016-01-19 21:10 ` YanBo 2016-01-19 21:10 ` YanBo 2016-01-19 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger 2016-01-19 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger 2016-01-19 21:55 ` Felix Fietkau 2016-01-19 21:55 ` Felix Fietkau
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=518183C8.8050606@openwrt.org \ --to=nbd@openwrt.org \ --cc=chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com \ --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com \ --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.