All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] PVH xen: add XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:14:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A8940B02000078000D9F71@nat28.tlf.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369993120.5199.46.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

>>> On 31.05.13 at 11:38, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 10:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 25.05.13 at 03:25, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> wrote:
>> >  static int xenmem_add_to_physmap_once(
>> >      struct domain *d,
>> > -    const struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp)
>> > +    const struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp,
>> > +    domid_t foreign_domid)
>> 
>> The patch could be a bit smaller afaict if you used the otherwise
>> unused here domain ID field in xatp for passing the domain ID you
>> care about here (I hinted at that in the last round already, where
>> I also asked Stefano why we have three domains here in the first
>> place).
> 
> This interface is already used on ARM, I don't think we want PVH to use
> a different variation of the same thing so I don't think it is right to
> put this on Mukesh.

I expressed this wrong if you understood it this way: I'm not
asking Mukesh to alter the interface - I had asked Stefano why
it was the way it is, and while I'm not happy with the situation,
I appreciate that changing it again is not a very good idea.

All I'm asking is, instead of introducing a new function parameter
here, to use an otherwise unused field of the xatp input
structure. This is based on the fact that the field is being
evaluated once directly in arch_memory_op(), and then no longer
needed.

That would also allow doing the setting just once before loops get
started, rather than having to pass the same value again on each
loop iteration.

The one caveat is that for the continuation creation of
XENMEM_add_to_physmap the field would need to be prevented
from getting written back to guest memory. But I consider it bad
practice anyway to copy back whole structures when only
selected fields (often just one) need updating, and hence
switching that operation to do a couple of individual field writes
would be nice regardless of that change, even if this adds two or
three lines of code.

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-31 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-25  1:25 [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 01/18] PVH xen: turn gdb_frames/gdt_ents into union Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-31  9:13   ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 02/18] PVH xen: add XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-31  9:28   ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-31  9:38     ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-31 10:14       ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2013-05-31 10:40         ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-05  0:24         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05  0:31     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05  7:32       ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-05 20:41         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-06  6:43           ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-06 22:19             ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-07  6:13               ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-07 20:46                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-07 15:08             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-07 15:48               ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 03/18] PVH xen: create domctl_memory_mapping() function Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-31  9:46   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-05  0:47     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05  7:34       ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 04/18] PVH xen: add params to read_segment_register Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-31 10:00   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-06  1:25     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-06  6:48       ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-07  1:43         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-07  6:29           ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-08  0:45             ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-10  8:01               ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 23:10                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 05/18] PVH xen: vmx realted preparatory changes for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 06/18] PVH xen: Move e820 fields out of pv_domain struct Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05 15:33   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 07/18] PVH xen: Introduce PVH guest type Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 08/18] PVH xen: tools changes to create PVH domain Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-12 14:58   ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-15  0:14     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-17 11:11       ` Ian Campbell
2013-07-30 23:47         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-31 12:00           ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-01  2:02             ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-01  8:01               ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-02  1:12                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-29  1:51                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-29  9:01                   ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-30  0:45                     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-30  9:56                       ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-29 11:13               ` George Dunlap
2013-08-29 11:29                 ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-30  1:24                   ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-30  9:53                     ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-30 10:22                       ` George Dunlap
2013-08-30 10:27                     ` George Dunlap
2013-08-29  0:14         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-31  1:06     ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-31 11:32       ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 09/18] PVH xen: domain creation code changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 10/18] PVH xen: create PVH vmcs, and also initialization Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 11/18] PVH xen: create read_descriptor_sel() Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 12/18] PVH xen: support hypercalls for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05 15:27   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 13/18] PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 14/18] PVH xen: some misc changes like mtrr, intr, msi Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 15/18] PVH xen: hcall page initialize, create PVH guest type, etc Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 16/18] PVH xen: Miscellaneous changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05 15:39   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 17/18] PVH xen: Introduce p2m_map_foreign Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-25  1:25 ` [PATCH 18/18] PVH xen: Add and remove foreign pages Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-05 15:25   ` George Dunlap
2013-06-05 15:36   ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-05 18:34     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-05 20:51       ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-05 22:01         ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-06  8:46           ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-07 13:56             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-06 10:08     ` George Dunlap
2013-06-05 17:14   ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-06  7:29     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51A8940B02000078000D9F71@nat28.tlf.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.