All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Magnus Damm" <damm@opensource.se>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:44:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C2F92A.5050101@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbFEKJxQfvT4xR4z1iymHPmbbCYJriVPD95P_L0oCC6Jg@mail.gmail.com>

On 18/06/13 10:05, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote:
> 
>> Should we be standardizing the pins/groups/function properties too,
>> since the strings are pretty much passed straight through? The usage
>> seems pretty similar between the drivers I've seen (except ugly vendor
>> prefixes), so we could presumably get away with a single implementation
>> of dt_node_to_map?
> 
> This is an orthogonal issue I'd say.

agreed.

> Basically this goes back to the quite prolonged discussion about
> device tree bindings and the fact that we added the
> .dt_node_to_map() and .dt_free_map() functions in the
> first place.
> 
> I'd be happy to consolidate these mapping functions where
> possible, by moving to the core, basically.
> 
> But that would be a separate patch series.... interested? ;-)

Mildly, but I can't guarantee I'll get the time.

Cheers
James


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Magnus Damm" <damm@opensource.se>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:44:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C2F92A.5050101@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbFEKJxQfvT4xR4z1iymHPmbbCYJriVPD95P_L0oCC6Jg@mail.gmail.com>

On 18/06/13 10:05, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote:
> 
>> Should we be standardizing the pins/groups/function properties too,
>> since the strings are pretty much passed straight through? The usage
>> seems pretty similar between the drivers I've seen (except ugly vendor
>> prefixes), so we could presumably get away with a single implementation
>> of dt_node_to_map?
> 
> This is an orthogonal issue I'd say.

agreed.

> Basically this goes back to the quite prolonged discussion about
> device tree bindings and the fact that we added the
> .dt_node_to_map() and .dt_free_map() functions in the
> first place.
> 
> I'd be happy to consolidate these mapping functions where
> possible, by moving to the core, basically.
> 
> But that would be a separate patch series.... interested? ;-)

Mildly, but I can't guarantee I'll get the time.

Cheers
James


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-20 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 18:50 [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] sh-pfc: Remove support for platform data Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] sh-pfc: Add DT support Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] sh-pfc: Add pinconf support to DT bindings Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 18:50   ` Laurent Pinchart
     [not found] ` <1371495003-11185-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-18  8:05   ` [PATCH v7 0/3] SH pinctrl DT support Linus Walleij
2013-06-18  8:05     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-18  8:51     ` James Hogan
2013-06-18  8:51       ` James Hogan
2013-06-18  9:05       ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-18  9:05         ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-20 12:44         ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-06-20 12:44           ` James Hogan
2013-06-18  8:53     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-18  8:53       ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C2F92A.5050101@imgtec.com \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=damm@opensource.se \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.