All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, eranian@google.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Add Silvermont (22nm Atom) support
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:48:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E7C7E6.4020200@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130718090248.GF27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 07/18/2013 05:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:27:31PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 04:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:36:07PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>> +static struct event_constraint intel_slm_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
>>>> +{
>>>> +	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
>>>> +	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
>>>> +	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x013c, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
>>>> +	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
>>>
>>> So the normal event 0x13c and the fixed counter 2 are normally _not_ the
>>> same. Are they for slm? Are you sure?
>>>
>>
>> yes, I'm sure. see page 15-15 of http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-optimization-manual.pdf
> 
> OK, then put in a comment how slm is 'special' and you might want to fix
> intel_pmu_init():
> 
> 	if (x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
> 		/*
> 		 * event on fixed counter2 (REF_CYCLES) only works on this
> 		 * counter, so do not extend mask to generic counters
> 		 */
> 		for_each_event_constraint(c, x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
> 			if (c->cmask != FIXED_EVENT_FLAGS
> 			    || c->idxmsk64 == INTEL_PMC_MSK_FIXED_REF_CYCLES) {
> 				continue;
> 			}
> 
> 			c->idxmsk64 |= (1ULL << x86_pmu.num_counters) - 1;
> 			c->weight += x86_pmu.num_counters;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> Since that explicitly skips the fixed counter 2 and doesn't extend its
> constraint to include all other counters.
> 

how about below patch

Regards
Yan, Zheng
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 8249df4..aa0d876 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ struct x86_pmu_capability {
 /* CPU_CLK_Unhalted.Ref: */
 #define MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR2	0x30b
 #define INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_REF_CYCLES	(INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 2)
-#define INTEL_PMC_MSK_FIXED_REF_CYCLES	(1ULL << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_REF_CYCLES)
 
 /*
  * We model BTS tracing as another fixed-mode PMC.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index e4bb30a..47ffb48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_slm_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
 	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x013c, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
-	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* pseudo CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
 	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
 };
 
@@ -2331,6 +2330,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 		intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom();
 
+		/* both event 0x013c and fixed counter2 count REF_CYCLES */
+		intel_perfmon_event_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES] = 0x013c;
+
 		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_slm_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_slm_pebs_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_slm_extra_regs;
@@ -2486,12 +2488,12 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 	if (x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
 		/*
-		 * event on fixed counter2 (REF_CYCLES) only works on this
-		 * counter, so do not extend mask to generic counters
+		 * If only fixed counter2 can count event REF_CYCLES, we use
+		 * pseudo-code 0x0300 for REF_CYCLES.
 		 */
 		for_each_event_constraint(c, x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
-			if (c->cmask != FIXED_EVENT_FLAGS
-			    || c->idxmsk64 == INTEL_PMC_MSK_FIXED_REF_CYCLES) {
+			if (c->cmask != FIXED_EVENT_FLAGS ||
+			    c->code == 0x0300) {
 				continue;
 			}
 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18  5:36 [PATCH] perf, x86: Add Silvermont (22nm Atom) support Yan, Zheng
2013-07-18  5:39 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-18  8:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18 11:00     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-18  8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18  8:27   ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-18  9:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18 10:48       ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2013-07-18 11:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-19  2:26     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-18  8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-18  8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E7C7E6.4020200@intel.com \
    --to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.