From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:15:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1B17F.30902@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725223658.GJ26107@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:33:14PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Any comments here. I would like to know your plan for the new
>> API. You might have seen on the ARM no-bootmem thread, we started to
>> move ARM to nobootmem with Russell's help.
>
> Ooh, the plan sounds good to me and I was thinking you were gonna do
> it?
>
Wooo..
Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I need help to at least have new
memblock API support since I am not familiar with memblock code.
I could help in adaptation to the new API for ARM arch and
core kernel code.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:15:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1B17F.30902@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725223658.GJ26107@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:33:14PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Any comments here. I would like to know your plan for the new
>> API. You might have seen on the ARM no-bootmem thread, we started to
>> move ARM to nobootmem with Russell's help.
>
> Ooh, the plan sounds good to me and I was thinking you were gonna do
> it?
>
Wooo..
Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I need help to at least have new
memblock API support since I am not familiar with memblock code.
I could help in adaptation to the new API for ARM arch and
core kernel code.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:15:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1B17F.30902@ti.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20130725231511.kS0g4jqLiGzpkdjxZCeKehmFSjKNsdNR_eAgKdV7B5E@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725223658.GJ26107@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:33:14PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Any comments here. I would like to know your plan for the new
>> API. You might have seen on the ARM no-bootmem thread, we started to
>> move ARM to nobootmem with Russell's help.
>
> Ooh, the plan sounds good to me and I was thinking you were gonna do
> it?
>
Wooo..
Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I need help to at least have new
memblock API support since I am not familiar with memblock code.
I could help in adaptation to the new API for ARM arch and
core kernel code.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:15:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1B17F.30902@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725223658.GJ26107@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:33:14PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Any comments here. I would like to know your plan for the new
>> API. You might have seen on the ARM no-bootmem thread, we started to
>> move ARM to nobootmem with Russell's help.
>
> Ooh, the plan sounds good to me and I was thinking you were gonna do
> it?
>
Wooo..
Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I need help to at least have new
memblock API support since I am not familiar with memblock code.
I could help in adaptation to the new API for ARM arch and
core kernel code.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:15:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1B17F.30902@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725223658.GJ26107@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:36 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:33:14PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Any comments here. I would like to know your plan for the new
>> API. You might have seen on the ARM no-bootmem thread, we started to
>> move ARM to nobootmem with Russell's help.
>
> Ooh, the plan sounds good to me and I was thinking you were gonna do
> it?
>
Wooo..
Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but I need help to at least have new
memblock API support since I am not familiar with memblock code.
I could help in adaptation to the new API for ARM arch and
core kernel code.
Let me know your thoughts.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-29 1:01 [PATCH] WIP: HACK: LPAE, BOOTMEM and NO_BOOTMEM Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-29 1:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-29 15:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-29 15:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-29 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-29 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-29 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-29 18:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-29 18:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-29 18:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-29 18:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-29 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-29 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-29 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-29 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-01 14:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 14:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 14:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-01 14:10 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 22:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-25 22:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-25 22:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-25 23:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-07-25 23:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 23:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 23:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-25 23:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-26 3:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-26 3:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-26 3:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-02 21:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-02 21:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-02 21:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-02 21:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-02 21:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-05 15:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-05 15:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F1B17F.30902@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.