does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and
noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there
something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick
look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know?

rday

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

[Nicolas Dechesne]

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>
>   testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and
> noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there
> something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick
> look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know?

It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that
use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?

>
> rday
>
> 
>

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and
> > noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there
> > something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick
> > look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know?
>
> It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that
> use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?

  most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation,
i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no
apparent reason.

rday

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

[Mike Looijmans]

Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert


TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands

T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
W: www.topic.nl

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
On 19-03-2021 11:45, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>    testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and
>>> noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there
>>> something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick
>>> look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know?
>> It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that
>> use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?
>    most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation,
> i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no
> apparent reason.
>
My favorite method for that is to just remove the recipe that provides 
it and then see where it breaks...

Re: [yocto] does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Mike Looijmans wrote:

>
> Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,
>
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
>
>
> TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
> Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
> The Netherlands
>
> T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
> E: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> W: www.topic.nl
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> On 19-03-2021 11:45, Robert P. J. Day via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:47 AM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and
> >>> noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there
> >>> something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a quick
> >>> look to see what's demanding that, does anyone know?
> >> It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that
> >> use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?
> >    most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation,
> > i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no
> > apparent reason.
> >
> My favorite method for that is to just remove the recipe that provides it and
> then see where it breaks...

  it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that
shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native,
which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later.

rday