All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:52:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> Whole series applied as follows:
>>>
>>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7)
>>>     |
>>>     +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6)
>>>             |
>>>             +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10)
>>>
>>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64.
>>>
>>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci.  Unless it all falls apart in -next,
>>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc.
>>
>> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a
>> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches?
> 
> It's as stable as I can make it.  I've tested it for all known build
> regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it.
> Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if
> appropriate.

OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then
it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might
change.

So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today.

Thanks.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:52:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130812174439.GO25111@titan.lakedaemon.net>

On 08/12/2013 11:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:52AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/12/2013 10:37 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> Whole series applied as follows:
>>>
>>> +---+ mvebu/msi_pci (1-4,7)
>>>     |
>>>     +---+---+ mvebu/msi_irq (5,6)
>>>             |
>>>             +---+---+ mvebu/msi_mvebu (8-10)
>>>
>>> mvebu/msi_pci built successfully with Randy's config for x86_64.
>>>
>>> Thierry, I've tagged mvebu/msi_pci.  Unless it all falls apart in -next,
>>> those commit-id's won't change from what will be in arm-soc.
>>
>> So, the branch still isn't stable, hence I shouldn't use it as a
>> baseline to apply Thierry's PCIe patches?
> 
> It's as stable as I can make it.  I've tested it for all known build
> regressions (discovered in -next), and I see no reason to change it.
> Anything needing fixed after today, I'll append the fix to it's HEAD if
> appropriate.

OK, if you will only append fixes rather than rebase the branch, then
it's fine; what you said above implied that the commit IDs still might
change.

So, I'll try pulling this in with Thierry's patches today.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-12 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-09 20:27 [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 01/10] PCI: use weak functions for MSI arch-specific functions Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 02/10] PCI: remove ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI kconfig option Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 03/10] PCI: Introduce new MSI chip infrastructure Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 04/10] of: pci: add registry of MSI chips Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 05/10] irqchip: armada-370-xp: properly request resources Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 06/10] irqchip: armada-370-xp: implement MSI support Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 07/10] ARM: pci: add ->add_bus() and ->remove_bus() hooks to hw_pci Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 08/10] ARM: mvebu: the MPIC now provides MSI controller features Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 09/10] PCI: mvebu: add support for MSI Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27 ` [PATCHv9 10/10] ARM: mvebu: link PCIe controllers to the MSI controller Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-09 20:27   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-12 16:37 ` [PATCHv9 00/10] MSI support for Marvell EBU PCIe driver Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 16:37   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 17:09   ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:09     ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:44     ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 17:44       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 17:52       ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-08-12 17:52         ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-12 17:54         ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 17:54           ` Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520920C1.5040904@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=alior@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maen@marvell.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.