All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:35:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52199796.4080800@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87li3qsbk9.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>

Hello Chris,

On 25/08/2013 05:18, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 18 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to
>> avoid common clk framework warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
>> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> Okay, pushed to mmc-next for 3.12.

Thanks.

>
> Boris, you got feedback from Thomas Petazzoni and Russell King, but
> you didn't CC either of them on the patch v4

I didn't knew I had to add the reviewers of a patch in the cc list
of the future versions. I'll do it next time.

> , and you didn't write a
> changelog explaining the differences between patches v3 and v4 --
> please do both of those next time.

The changelog is in the cover letter ("Changes since v3").
But I didn't send you this cover letter.

> Also, it looks like the Ack from Ludovic happened away from the MMC
> list, since I don't see a message from Ludovic on the thread here.
> It would be better if the Ack happened somewhere I can see it.

The 'Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>' was added
in the 2nd version of this patch series.
But I don't know if I should have kept it in this version since this 
patch has evolved.


Thanks for these feebacks, I'm still learning the good practices of the 
kernel
submission process.
I'll check these points next time.

Best Regards,

Boris
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:35:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52199796.4080800@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87li3qsbk9.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>

Hello Chris,

On 25/08/2013 05:18, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 18 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to
>> avoid common clk framework warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
>> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
> Okay, pushed to mmc-next for 3.12.

Thanks.

>
> Boris, you got feedback from Thomas Petazzoni and Russell King, but
> you didn't CC either of them on the patch v4

I didn't knew I had to add the reviewers of a patch in the cc list
of the future versions. I'll do it next time.

> , and you didn't write a
> changelog explaining the differences between patches v3 and v4 --
> please do both of those next time.

The changelog is in the cover letter ("Changes since v3").
But I didn't send you this cover letter.

> Also, it looks like the Ack from Ludovic happened away from the MMC
> list, since I don't see a message from Ludovic on the thread here.
> It would be better if the Ack happened somewhere I can see it.

The 'Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>' was added
in the 2nd version of this patch series.
But I don't know if I should have kept it in this version since this 
patch has evolved.


Thanks for these feebacks, I'm still learning the good practices of the 
kernel
submission process.
I'll check these points next time.

Best Regards,

Boris
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-25  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18  7:32 [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: at91: prepare transition to common clk framework Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:32 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:34   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:38   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22  9:41   ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22  9:41     ` boris brezillon
2013-08-25  3:18   ` Chris Ball
2013-08-25  3:18     ` Chris Ball
2013-08-25  5:35     ` boris brezillon [this message]
2013-08-25  5:35       ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: " Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:40   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:40   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-30  7:18   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-08-30  7:18     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-08-30  7:18     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-07-18  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] USB: gadget: atmel_usba: " Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:43   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: atmel-ssc: remove clk_disable_unprepare call from critical section Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:48   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  9:53   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18  9:53     ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18 10:21     ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18 10:21       ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18 10:58       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18 10:58         ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18 11:33         ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18 11:33           ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18 11:25   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18 11:25     ` Mark Brown
2013-07-18 11:34     ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18 11:34       ` boris brezillon
2013-07-18  7:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-18  7:58   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-21 12:13   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-08-21 12:13     ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-07-22 17:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: at91: prepare transition to common clk framework Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-07-22 17:03   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52199796.4080800@overkiz.com \
    --to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.