From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com> To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:35:18 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <52199796.4080800@overkiz.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87li3qsbk9.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Hello Chris, On 25/08/2013 05:18, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 18 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to >> avoid common clk framework warnings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com> >> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> > Okay, pushed to mmc-next for 3.12. Thanks. > > Boris, you got feedback from Thomas Petazzoni and Russell King, but > you didn't CC either of them on the patch v4 I didn't knew I had to add the reviewers of a patch in the cc list of the future versions. I'll do it next time. > , and you didn't write a > changelog explaining the differences between patches v3 and v4 -- > please do both of those next time. The changelog is in the cover letter ("Changes since v3"). But I didn't send you this cover letter. > Also, it looks like the Ack from Ludovic happened away from the MMC > list, since I don't see a message from Ludovic on the thread here. > It would be better if the Ack happened somewhere I can see it. The 'Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>' was added in the 2nd version of this patch series. But I don't know if I should have kept it in this version since this patch has evolved. Thanks for these feebacks, I'm still learning the good practices of the kernel submission process. I'll check these points next time. Best Regards, Boris > Thanks, > > - Chris.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:35:18 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <52199796.4080800@overkiz.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87li3qsbk9.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Hello Chris, On 25/08/2013 05:18, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 18 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote: >> Replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare to >> avoid common clk framework warnings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com> >> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> > Okay, pushed to mmc-next for 3.12. Thanks. > > Boris, you got feedback from Thomas Petazzoni and Russell King, but > you didn't CC either of them on the patch v4 I didn't knew I had to add the reviewers of a patch in the cc list of the future versions. I'll do it next time. > , and you didn't write a > changelog explaining the differences between patches v3 and v4 -- > please do both of those next time. The changelog is in the cover letter ("Changes since v3"). But I didn't send you this cover letter. > Also, it looks like the Ack from Ludovic happened away from the MMC > list, since I don't see a message from Ludovic on the thread here. > It would be better if the Ack happened somewhere I can see it. The 'Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>' was added in the 2nd version of this patch series. But I don't know if I should have kept it in this version since this patch has evolved. Thanks for these feebacks, I'm still learning the good practices of the kernel submission process. I'll check these points next time. Best Regards, Boris > Thanks, > > - Chris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-25 5:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-07-18 7:32 [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: at91: prepare transition to common clk framework Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:32 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:34 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:38 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-08-22 9:41 ` boris brezillon 2013-08-22 9:41 ` boris brezillon 2013-08-25 3:18 ` Chris Ball 2013-08-25 3:18 ` Chris Ball 2013-08-25 5:35 ` boris brezillon [this message] 2013-08-25 5:35 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: " Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:40 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:40 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-08-30 7:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-08-30 7:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-08-30 7:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2013-07-18 7:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] USB: gadget: atmel_usba: " Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:43 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: atmel-ssc: remove clk_disable_unprepare call from critical section Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:48 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 9:53 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 10:21 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 10:21 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 10:58 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 10:58 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 11:33 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 11:33 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 11:25 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 11:25 ` Mark Brown 2013-07-18 11:34 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 11:34 ` boris brezillon 2013-07-18 7:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare Boris BREZILLON 2013-07-18 7:58 ` Boris BREZILLON 2013-08-21 12:13 ` Nicolas Ferre 2013-08-21 12:13 ` Nicolas Ferre 2013-07-22 17:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: at91: prepare transition to common clk framework Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2013-07-22 17:03 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=52199796.4080800@overkiz.com \ --to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \ --cc=cjb@laptop.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \ --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.