[RFC, PATCH] ARM: PJ4: don't use PJ4B code on PJ4

[RFC, PATCH] ARM: PJ4: don't use PJ4B code on PJ4

[Arnd Bergmann]

We can have multiplatform kernels with PJ4 (Dove, MMP2) in combination
with PJ4B (Armada 370) or PJ4B-MP (Berlin, Armada XP), and the processor
functions that are defined for PJ4B use a mask that covers all three
core types, rather than using the default ARMv7 type for the original
PJ4.

This adds a second entry for PJ4B-MP, so we at least get a consistent
behavior between single-machine kernels and combined ones.

I suspect however that we actually want different contents for each
of the three cores, as PJ4B and PJ4B-MP appear to be at least as
different as PJ4 is from PJ4B, in particular the support for
the standard architecture extensions like IDIV and LPAE, and the
PJ4B_ERRATA_4742 workaround apparently does not apply to PJ4B-MP
but might apply to PJ4.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 049be07053eb ("ARM: 7754/1: Fix the CPU ID and the mask associated to the PJ4B")

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
index 0f92d575a304..c9384c4780ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
@@ -576,10 +576,17 @@ __v7_ca8_proc_info:
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PJ4B
 	.type   __v7_pj4b_proc_info, #object
 __v7_pj4b_proc_info:
-	.long	0x560f5800
-	.long	0xff0fff00
+	.long	0x562f5840
+	.long	0xfffffff0
 	__v7_proc __v7_pj4b_proc_info, __v7_pj4b_setup, proc_fns = pj4b_processor_functions
 	.size	__v7_pj4b_proc_info, . - __v7_pj4b_proc_info
+
+	.type   __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, #object
+__v7_pj4bmp_proc_info:
+	.long	0x561f5810
+	.long	0xfffffff0
+	__v7_proc __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, __v7_pj4b_setup, proc_fns = pj4b_processor_functions
+	.size	__v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, . - __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info
 #endif
 
 	/*

[RFC, PATCH] ARM: PJ4: don't use PJ4B code on PJ4

[Arnd Bergmann]

We can have multiplatform kernels with PJ4 (Dove, MMP2) in combination
with PJ4B (Armada 370) or PJ4B-MP (Berlin, Armada XP), and the processor
functions that are defined for PJ4B use a mask that covers all three
core types, rather than using the default ARMv7 type for the original
PJ4.

This adds a second entry for PJ4B-MP, so we at least get a consistent
behavior between single-machine kernels and combined ones.

I suspect however that we actually want different contents for each
of the three cores, as PJ4B and PJ4B-MP appear to be at least as
different as PJ4 is from PJ4B, in particular the support for
the standard architecture extensions like IDIV and LPAE, and the
PJ4B_ERRATA_4742 workaround apparently does not apply to PJ4B-MP
but might apply to PJ4.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 049be07053eb ("ARM: 7754/1: Fix the CPU ID and the mask associated to the PJ4B")

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
index 0f92d575a304..c9384c4780ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
@@ -576,10 +576,17 @@ __v7_ca8_proc_info:
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PJ4B
 	.type   __v7_pj4b_proc_info, #object
 __v7_pj4b_proc_info:
-	.long	0x560f5800
-	.long	0xff0fff00
+	.long	0x562f5840
+	.long	0xfffffff0
 	__v7_proc __v7_pj4b_proc_info, __v7_pj4b_setup, proc_fns = pj4b_processor_functions
 	.size	__v7_pj4b_proc_info, . - __v7_pj4b_proc_info
+
+	.type   __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, #object
+__v7_pj4bmp_proc_info:
+	.long	0x561f5810
+	.long	0xfffffff0
+	__v7_proc __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, __v7_pj4b_setup, proc_fns = pj4b_processor_functions
+	.size	__v7_pj4bmp_proc_info, . - __v7_pj4bmp_proc_info
 #endif
 
 	/*