All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@gmail.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>,
	Yang Wenyou <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured wdt
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:31:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F8E89.30005@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com>

Hi Wim,

I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but I found some bugs in my patch series:

1) the secs_to_ticks returns an erronous value when 0 is passed as an 
argument
2) the calculated heartbeat is too small for some use cases
     (i.e. kexecing a new kernel might trigger a watchdog reset before 
the new kernel
      is able to load the watchdog driver)
3) when initializing the watchdog driver, the timer should be configured 
with the min_heartbeat value
     instead of the standard heartbeat value, because we don't for how 
long the timer has been running.

I'll send a new patch fixing those issues.
I hope it won't bother you :-(.

Best Regards,

Boris

On 29/10/2013 08:50, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch series is a porposal to enhance the sam9 watchdog timer support.
>>
>> The at91sam9 watchdog timer can only be configured once, and the current
>> implementation tries to configure it in a static way:
>> - 2 seconds timeout
>> - wdt restart every 500ms
>>
>> If the timer has already been configured with different values, it returns an
>> error and do not create any watchdog device.
>>
>> This is not critical if the watchdog is disabled, but if it has been enabled
>> with different timeout values it will lead to a SoC reset.
>>
>> This patch series tries to address this issue by adapting the heartbeat value
>> according the WDT timer config:
>> - it first tries to configure the timer as requested.
>> - if it fails it fallbacks to the current config, adapting its heartbeat timer
>> to the needs
>>
>> This patch series also move to a dynamically allocated at91wdt device instead
>> of the static instance. I'm not sure this is the best solution, so please tell
>> me if you prefer to keep static instance of watchdog.
>>
>> It adds a new at91 wdt type: software. This new type make use of the at91 wdt
>> interrupt to trigger a software reboot.
>>
>> Finally it adds several properties to the device tree bindings.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Boris
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>>   - fix coding style issues
>>   - remove unneeded watchdog_active test
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - fix a bug in heartbeat time computation
>>   - fix a bug in at91_wdt_set_timeout when new timeout is bigger than the old
>>     one
>>   - rename at91_wdt_ping into at91_wdt_start
>>   - remove unneeded ping callback assignment
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - fix documentation
>>   - rework the heartbeat computation to get a more flexible behaviour
>>   - fix xx_to_yy macros
>>   - modify warning and error messages
>>   - remove unneeded parenthesis in arithmetic operations
>>   - use devm functions to map io memory
>>   - remove unneeded devm_kfree calls
>>
>> Change since v1:
>>   - fix typo in documentaion
>>   - fix irq dt definition for sama5d3 SoC
>>
>>
>> Boris BREZILLON (4):
>>    watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support
>>    watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: update device tree doc
>>    ARM: at91/dt: add sam9 watchdog default options to SoCs
>>    ARM: at91/dt: add watchdog properties to kizbox board
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt     |   30 +-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi                  |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/kizbox.dts                       |    6 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi                     |    5 +
>>   drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c                    |  309 ++++++++++++++------
>>   9 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> These 4 patches have been added to linux-watchdog-next.
>
> Kind regards,
> Wim.
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b.brezillon@overkiz.com (boris brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured wdt
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:31:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F8E89.30005@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131029075028.GF19704@spo001.leaseweb.com>

Hi Wim,

I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but I found some bugs in my patch series:

1) the secs_to_ticks returns an erronous value when 0 is passed as an 
argument
2) the calculated heartbeat is too small for some use cases
     (i.e. kexecing a new kernel might trigger a watchdog reset before 
the new kernel
      is able to load the watchdog driver)
3) when initializing the watchdog driver, the timer should be configured 
with the min_heartbeat value
     instead of the standard heartbeat value, because we don't for how 
long the timer has been running.

I'll send a new patch fixing those issues.
I hope it won't bother you :-(.

Best Regards,

Boris

On 29/10/2013 08:50, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch series is a porposal to enhance the sam9 watchdog timer support.
>>
>> The at91sam9 watchdog timer can only be configured once, and the current
>> implementation tries to configure it in a static way:
>> - 2 seconds timeout
>> - wdt restart every 500ms
>>
>> If the timer has already been configured with different values, it returns an
>> error and do not create any watchdog device.
>>
>> This is not critical if the watchdog is disabled, but if it has been enabled
>> with different timeout values it will lead to a SoC reset.
>>
>> This patch series tries to address this issue by adapting the heartbeat value
>> according the WDT timer config:
>> - it first tries to configure the timer as requested.
>> - if it fails it fallbacks to the current config, adapting its heartbeat timer
>> to the needs
>>
>> This patch series also move to a dynamically allocated at91wdt device instead
>> of the static instance. I'm not sure this is the best solution, so please tell
>> me if you prefer to keep static instance of watchdog.
>>
>> It adds a new at91 wdt type: software. This new type make use of the at91 wdt
>> interrupt to trigger a software reboot.
>>
>> Finally it adds several properties to the device tree bindings.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Boris
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>>   - fix coding style issues
>>   - remove unneeded watchdog_active test
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - fix a bug in heartbeat time computation
>>   - fix a bug in at91_wdt_set_timeout when new timeout is bigger than the old
>>     one
>>   - rename at91_wdt_ping into at91_wdt_start
>>   - remove unneeded ping callback assignment
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>   - fix documentation
>>   - rework the heartbeat computation to get a more flexible behaviour
>>   - fix xx_to_yy macros
>>   - modify warning and error messages
>>   - remove unneeded parenthesis in arithmetic operations
>>   - use devm functions to map io memory
>>   - remove unneeded devm_kfree calls
>>
>> Change since v1:
>>   - fix typo in documentaion
>>   - fix irq dt definition for sama5d3 SoC
>>
>>
>> Boris BREZILLON (4):
>>    watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support
>>    watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: update device tree doc
>>    ARM: at91/dt: add sam9 watchdog default options to SoCs
>>    ARM: at91/dt: add watchdog properties to kizbox board
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt     |   30 +-
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi                 |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi                  |    5 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/kizbox.dts                       |    6 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi                     |    5 +
>>   drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c                    |  309 ++++++++++++++------
>>   9 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> These 4 patches have been added to linux-watchdog-next.
>
> Kind regards,
> Wim.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-04  7:24 [PATCH v5 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured wdt Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04 22:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:30     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:30     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04  7:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: update device tree doc Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04 22:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:30     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04  7:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ARM: at91/dt: add sam9 watchdog default options to SoCs Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04 22:31   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:31     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04  7:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: at91/dt: add watchdog properties to kizbox board Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04  7:24   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-04 22:32   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:32     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-04 22:32     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29  7:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: handle already configured wdt Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-10-29 10:31   ` boris brezillon [this message]
2013-10-29 10:31     ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 12:58     ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-10-29 13:25       ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 13:25         ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 10:37   ` [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: various fixes Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-29 10:37     ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-10-29 15:45     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 15:45       ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 16:22       ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 16:22         ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 16:43         ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 16:43           ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 17:22           ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 17:22             ` boris brezillon
2013-10-29 21:27             ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-29 21:27               ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-30  6:01               ` b.brezillon
2013-10-30  6:01                 ` b.brezillon at overkiz.com
2013-10-31 10:13               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-10-31 10:13                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-03 14:42             ` boris brezillon
2013-11-03 14:42               ` boris brezillon
2013-11-03 16:22               ` Guenter Roeck
2013-11-03 16:22                 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-11-03 17:55                 ` boris brezillon
2013-11-03 17:55                   ` boris brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=526F8E89.30005@overkiz.com \
    --to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabio.porcedda@gmail.com \
    --cc=groeck7@gmail.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=wenyou.yang@atmel.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.