All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Question] : tie a task to a cluster when it shares memory resources
@ 2013-10-29 17:32 Daniel Lezcano
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2013-10-29 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Ingo Molnar


Hi all,

I am not expert on the NUMA area and the scheduler but I was wondering 
the following:

On numa a process can define a memory policy to optimize access because 
remote memory access is suboptimal.

On a multicluster (aka multipackage), eg. Bi-Xeon 4 cores, the scheduler 
load balancing can spawn/balance a task to the second cluster even if 
the task is resulting from a fork or a pthread_create. If I am correct 
that could impact the performances due to L2 cache misses, no ?

Won't it be more efficient to tie a task to a cluster when it shares 
memory resources with another task on the same cluster ? and when the 
task does 'exec', this constraint is removed.

Thanks
-- Daniel

-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-10-29 17:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-29 17:32 [Question] : tie a task to a cluster when it shares memory resources Daniel Lezcano

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.