* [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
@ 2014-01-06 9:36 xen.org
2014-01-07 12:29 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: xen.org @ 2014-01-06 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: ian.jackson
flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like 24146
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like 23938
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like 24146
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 9a80d5056766535ac624774b96495f8b97b1d28b
baseline version:
xen 9a80d5056766535ac624774b96495f8b97b1d28b
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Published tested tree is already up to date.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-06 9:36 [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL xen.org
@ 2014-01-07 12:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 10:49 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-01-07 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: George Dunlap, ian.jackson
>>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
>
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like 24146
> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like 23938
> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like 24146
These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
this before 4.4 goes out.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-07 12:29 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-01-08 10:49 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 10:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-01-08 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, ian.jackson
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
> >
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> >
> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like 24146
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like 23938
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like 24146
>
> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> this before 4.4 goes out.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".
I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 10:49 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 10:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 11:12 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-01-08 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, ian.jackson
>>> On 08.01.14 at 11:49, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
>> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
>> >
>> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>> >
>> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like
> 24146
>> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like
> 23938
>> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like
> 24146
>>
>> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
>> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
>> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
>> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
>> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
>> this before 4.4 goes out.
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> n7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
>
> says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> nxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
>
> is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".
>
> I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
> is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
> the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
Right, neither did I. I was particularly thinking of qemu though,
since I think these pretty persistent failures started around the
time the qemu tree upgrade was done. Of course this could just
be coincidence with a hypervisor side change having bad effects.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 10:59 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-01-08 11:12 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 11:24 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-01-08 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, ian.jackson, Stefano Stabellini,
Anthony Perard
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 10:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.01.14 at 11:49, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
> >> >
> >> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> >> >
> >> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> >> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like
> > 24146
> >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like
> > 23938
> >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like
> > 24146
> >>
> >> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> >> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> >> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> >> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> >> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> >> this before 4.4 goes out.
> >
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > n7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> >
> > says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.
> >
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > nxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> >
> > is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".
FWIW It's code 0x7 which
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff560185%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
says is "The current thread attempted to free the pool, which was
already freed.".
The Internet(tm) seems to think this is often a driver issue. Not that
this helps us much!
> > I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
> > is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
> > the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
>
> Right, neither did I. I was particularly thinking of qemu though,
> since I think these pretty persistent failures started around the
> time the qemu tree upgrade was done. Of course this could just
> be coincidence with a hypervisor side change having bad effects.
If there is a correlation then it would be interesting to investigate --
Anthony/Stefano could you guys have a look please.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 11:12 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 11:24 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:55 ` Anthony PERARD
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-01-08 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, ian.jackson, Stefano Stabellini,
Anthony Perard
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:12 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 10:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 08.01.14 at 11:49, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > >> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> > >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
> > >> >
> > >> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> > >> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like
> > > 24146
> > >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like
> > > 23938
> > >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like
> > > 24146
> > >>
> > >> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> > >> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> > >> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> > >> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> > >> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> > >> this before 4.4 goes out.
> > >
> > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > > n7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> > >
> > > says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.
> > >
> > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > > nxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> > >
> > > is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".
>
> FWIW It's code 0x7 which
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff560185%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
> says is "The current thread attempted to free the pool, which was
> already freed.".
>
> The Internet(tm) seems to think this is often a driver issue. Not that
> this helps us much!
>
> > > I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
> > > is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
> > > the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
> >
> > Right, neither did I. I was particularly thinking of qemu though,
> > since I think these pretty persistent failures started around the
> > time the qemu tree upgrade was done. Of course this could just
> > be coincidence with a hypervisor side change having bad effects.
>
> If there is a correlation then it would be interesting to investigate --
> Anthony/Stefano could you guys have a look please.
The earliest instance I could see with logs was 22371 (10/12/2013).
21288 (30/10/2013) has a windows-install failure but the logs have
expired so I cannot tell if it was the same failure.
I didn't look at the vnc for every failure I spotted, there were a lot
like these, and a lot where Windows was just sat at its login screen
(quite long standing issue I think? Thought not to be us?).
There were a smattering of other failures too e.g.:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22466/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22455/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
(bearing in mind that I didn't check all of them, if there was an easy
way to data mine the screen shots for all the failures of this test into
a directory it might be easier to scan)
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-07 12:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 10:49 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:45 ` Processed: " xen
2014-02-27 12:01 ` George Dunlap
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-01-08 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, ian.jackson
create ^
title it Windows install failures/BSOD
severity it blocker
thanks
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
> >
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> >
> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like 24146
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like 23938
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like 24146
>
> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> this before 4.4 goes out.
>
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Processed: Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 12:45 ` xen
2014-02-27 12:01 ` George Dunlap
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: xen @ 2014-01-08 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell, xen-devel
Processing commands for xen@bugs.xenproject.org:
> create ^
Created new bug #29 rooted at `<52CC01350200007800111164@nat28.tlf.novell.com>'
Title: `Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL'
> title it Windows install failures/BSOD
Set title for #29 to `Windows install failures/BSOD'
> severity it blocker
Change severity for #29 to `blocker'
> thanks
Finished processing.
Modified/created Bugs:
- 29: http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/29 (new)
---
Xen Hypervisor Bug Tracker
See http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs_against_Xen for information on reporting bugs
Contact xen-bugs-owner@bugs.xenproject.org with any infrastructure issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 11:24 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 12:55 ` Anthony PERARD
2014-01-08 13:04 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Anthony PERARD @ 2014-01-08 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini, ian.jackson, Jan Beulich
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:24:50AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:12 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 10:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 08.01.14 at 11:49, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> > > >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> > > >> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like
> > > > 24146
> > > >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like
> > > > 23938
> > > >> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like
> > > > 24146
> > > >>
> > > >> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> > > >> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> > > >> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> > > >> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> > > >> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> > > >> this before 4.4 goes out.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > > > n7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> > > >
> > > > says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-wi
> > > > nxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> > > >
> > > > is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".
> >
> > FWIW It's code 0x7 which
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff560185%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
> > says is "The current thread attempted to free the pool, which was
> > already freed.".
> >
> > The Internet(tm) seems to think this is often a driver issue. Not that
> > this helps us much!
> >
> > > > I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
> > > > is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
> > > > the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
> > >
> > > Right, neither did I. I was particularly thinking of qemu though,
> > > since I think these pretty persistent failures started around the
> > > time the qemu tree upgrade was done. Of course this could just
> > > be coincidence with a hypervisor side change having bad effects.
> >
> > If there is a correlation then it would be interesting to investigate --
> > Anthony/Stefano could you guys have a look please.
>
> The earliest instance I could see with logs was 22371 (10/12/2013).
>
> 21288 (30/10/2013) has a windows-install failure but the logs have
> expired so I cannot tell if it was the same failure.
>
> I didn't look at the vnc for every failure I spotted, there were a lot
> like these, and a lot where Windows was just sat at its login screen
> (quite long standing issue I think? Thought not to be us?).
>
> There were a smattering of other failures too e.g.:
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22466/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22455/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
There is also this one:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/23724/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
an issue with ntfs.sys.
Or this one:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/23035/test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg
which say "a device driver has pool"
and google respond:
http://www.faultwire.com/solutions-fatal_error/A-device-driver-has-pool-0x000000C5-*1198.html
"A device driver has a bug that attempted to access memory either
nonexistent memory or memory it is not allowed to access."
So, maybe a emulated disk issue or memory issue ?
I'll try to reproduce the issue.
> (bearing in mind that I didn't check all of them, if there was an easy
> way to data mine the screen shots for all the failures of this test into
> a directory it might be easier to scan)
--
Anthony PERARD
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 12:55 ` Anthony PERARD
@ 2014-01-08 13:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 13:15 ` Processed: " xen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-01-08 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony PERARD
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini, ian.jackson, Jan Beulich
owner 28 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
thanks
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 12:55 +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> I'll try to reproduce the issue.
Thanks!
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Processed: Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 13:04 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-01-08 13:15 ` xen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: xen @ 2014-01-08 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell, xen-devel
Processing commands for xen@bugs.xenproject.org:
> owner 28 Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Change owner for #28 to `Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>'
> thanks
Finished processing.
Modified/created Bugs:
- 28: http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/28
---
Xen Hypervisor Bug Tracker
See http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs_against_Xen for information on reporting bugs
Contact xen-bugs-owner@bugs.xenproject.org with any infrastructure issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:45 ` Processed: " xen
@ 2014-02-27 12:01 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-27 12:15 ` Processed: " xen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: George Dunlap @ 2014-02-27 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich
close 29
thanks
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> create ^
> title it Windows install failures/BSOD
> severity it blocker
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
>> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/
>> >
>> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>> >
>> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>> > test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 debian-install fail like 24146
>> > test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail like 23938
>> > test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail like 24146
>>
>> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
>> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
>> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
>> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
>> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
>> this before 4.4 goes out.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Processed: Re: [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL
2014-02-27 12:01 ` George Dunlap
@ 2014-02-27 12:15 ` xen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: xen @ 2014-02-27 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: George Dunlap, xen-devel
Processing commands for xen@bugs.xenproject.org:
> close 29
Closing bug #29
> thanks
Finished processing.
Modified/created Bugs:
- 29: http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/29
---
Xen Hypervisor Bug Tracker
See http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Reporting_Bugs_against_Xen for information on reporting bugs
Contact xen-bugs-owner@bugs.xenproject.org with any infrastructure issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-27 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-06 9:36 [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL xen.org
2014-01-07 12:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 10:49 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 10:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-08 11:12 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 11:24 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:55 ` Anthony PERARD
2014-01-08 13:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 13:15 ` Processed: " xen
2014-01-08 12:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-08 12:45 ` Processed: " xen
2014-02-27 12:01 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-27 12:15 ` Processed: " xen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.