All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
@ 2014-02-24 10:58 ` Liu, Jinsong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Jinsong @ 2014-02-24 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Paolo Bonzini', 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

>From 44c2abca2c2eadc6f2f752b66de4acc8131880c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:12:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest

This patch enable Intel MPX feature to guest.

Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c   |    6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.h   |    3 ++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index b241325..ddc8a7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 #endif
 	unsigned f_rdtscp = kvm_x86_ops->rdtscp_supported() ? F(RDTSCP) : 0;
 	unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
+	unsigned f_mpx = kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported ?
+			 (kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0) : 0;
 
 	/* cpuid 1.edx */
 	const u32 kvm_supported_word0_x86_features =
@@ -303,7 +305,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 	/* cpuid 7.0.ebx */
 	const u32 kvm_supported_word9_x86_features =
 		F(FSGSBASE) | F(BMI1) | F(HLE) | F(AVX2) | F(SMEP) |
-		F(BMI2) | F(ERMS) | f_invpcid | F(RTM) | F(RDSEED) |
+		F(BMI2) | F(ERMS) | f_invpcid | F(RTM) | f_mpx | F(RDSEED) |
 		F(ADX);
 
 	/* all calls to cpuid_count() should be made on the same cpu */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 89e4e27..3570e71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 	u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
 	u64 valid_bits;
 
+	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
+		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
+
 	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
 	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
 		return 1;
@@ -616,6 +619,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 	if (xcr0 & ~valid_bits)
 		return 1;
 
+	if ((!(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDREGS)) != (!(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDCSR)))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_put_guest_xcr0(vcpu);
 	vcpu->arch.xcr0 = xcr0;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index 8da5823..392ecbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ int kvm_write_guest_virt_system(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	gva_t addr, void *val, unsigned int bytes,
 	struct x86_exception *exception);
 
-#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0	(XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM)
+#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0     (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM \
+				| XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR)
 extern u64 host_xcr0;
 
 extern unsigned int min_timer_period_us;
-- 
1.7.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
@ 2014-02-24 10:58 ` Liu, Jinsong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Jinsong @ 2014-02-24 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Paolo Bonzini', 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

>From 44c2abca2c2eadc6f2f752b66de4acc8131880c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:12:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest

This patch enable Intel MPX feature to guest.

Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c   |    6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.h   |    3 ++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index b241325..ddc8a7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 #endif
 	unsigned f_rdtscp = kvm_x86_ops->rdtscp_supported() ? F(RDTSCP) : 0;
 	unsigned f_invpcid = kvm_x86_ops->invpcid_supported() ? F(INVPCID) : 0;
+	unsigned f_mpx = kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported ?
+			 (kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported() ? F(MPX) : 0) : 0;
 
 	/* cpuid 1.edx */
 	const u32 kvm_supported_word0_x86_features =
@@ -303,7 +305,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
 	/* cpuid 7.0.ebx */
 	const u32 kvm_supported_word9_x86_features =
 		F(FSGSBASE) | F(BMI1) | F(HLE) | F(AVX2) | F(SMEP) |
-		F(BMI2) | F(ERMS) | f_invpcid | F(RTM) | F(RDSEED) |
+		F(BMI2) | F(ERMS) | f_invpcid | F(RTM) | f_mpx | F(RDSEED) |
 		F(ADX);
 
 	/* all calls to cpuid_count() should be made on the same cpu */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 89e4e27..3570e71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 	u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
 	u64 valid_bits;
 
+	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
+		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
+
 	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
 	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
 		return 1;
@@ -616,6 +619,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 	if (xcr0 & ~valid_bits)
 		return 1;
 
+	if ((!(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDREGS)) != (!(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDCSR)))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_put_guest_xcr0(vcpu);
 	vcpu->arch.xcr0 = xcr0;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index 8da5823..392ecbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ int kvm_write_guest_virt_system(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	gva_t addr, void *val, unsigned int bytes,
 	struct x86_exception *exception);
 
-#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0	(XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM)
+#define KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0     (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM \
+				| XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR)
 extern u64 host_xcr0;
 
 extern unsigned int min_timer_period_us;
-- 
1.7.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
  2014-02-24 10:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu, Jinsong
@ 2014-02-24 11:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-02-24 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Jinsong, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
>  	u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
>  	u64 valid_bits;
>
> +	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
> +		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
> +
>  	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
>  	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
>  		return 1;

This hunk is incorrect, and I can simply drop it when applying.  If MPX 
is not supported, it should not be in the 0Dh CPUID leaf and thus in 
vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0.

This however relies on userspace passing a "sensible" value of CPUID. 
I'll send a patch to strengthen the computation of guest_supported_xcr0.

Thanks!

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
@ 2014-02-24 11:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-02-24 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Jinsong, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
>  	u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
>  	u64 valid_bits;
>
> +	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
> +		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
> +
>  	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
>  	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
>  		return 1;

This hunk is incorrect, and I can simply drop it when applying.  If MPX 
is not supported, it should not be in the 0Dh CPUID leaf and thus in 
vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0.

This however relies on userspace passing a "sensible" value of CPUID. 
I'll send a patch to strengthen the computation of guest_supported_xcr0.

Thanks!

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
  2014-02-24 11:13   ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-02-24 15:37     ` Liu, Jinsong
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Jinsong @ 2014-02-24 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
>> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
>>  	index, u64 xcr) u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
>>  	u64 valid_bits;
>> 
>> +	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
>> +		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
>> +
>>  	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
>>  	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
>>  		return 1;
> 
> This hunk is incorrect, and I can simply drop it when applying.  If
> MPX is not supported, it should not be in the 0Dh CPUID leaf and thus
> in vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0.
> 
> This however relies on userspace passing a "sensible" value of CPUID.
> I'll send a patch to strengthen the computation of
> guest_supported_xcr0. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo

So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?

Thanks,
Jinsong

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
@ 2014-02-24 15:37     ` Liu, Jinsong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Jinsong @ 2014-02-24 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/02/2014 11:58, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
>> @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32
>>  	index, u64 xcr) u64 old_xcr0 = vcpu->arch.xcr0;
>>  	u64 valid_bits;
>> 
>> +	if (!kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported || !kvm_x86_ops->mpx_supported())
>> +		xcr0 &= ~(XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR);
>> +
>>  	/* Only support XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK(xcr0) now  */
>>  	if (index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK)
>>  		return 1;
> 
> This hunk is incorrect, and I can simply drop it when applying.  If
> MPX is not supported, it should not be in the 0Dh CPUID leaf and thus
> in vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0.
> 
> This however relies on userspace passing a "sensible" value of CPUID.
> I'll send a patch to strengthen the computation of
> guest_supported_xcr0. 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo

So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?

Thanks,
Jinsong

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
  2014-02-24 15:37     ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu, Jinsong
@ 2014-02-24 16:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-02-24 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Jinsong, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Il 24/02/2014 16:37, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect
> hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?

Yes.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest
@ 2014-02-24 16:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-02-24 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Jinsong, 'kvm@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'qemu-devel@nongnu.org'
  Cc: 'gleb@redhat.com', 'hpa@zytor.com'

Il 24/02/2014 16:37, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> So patch v5 would be applied except you will remove the incorrect
> hunk, and you will send a patch strengthenning guest_supported_xcr0?

Yes.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-24 16:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-24 10:58 [PATCH v5 3/3] KVM: x86: Enable Intel MPX for guest Liu, Jinsong
2014-02-24 10:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu, Jinsong
2014-02-24 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 11:13   ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 15:37   ` Liu, Jinsong
2014-02-24 15:37     ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu, Jinsong
2014-02-24 16:40     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 16:40       ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.