From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
"alan@linux.intel.com" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len.Brown@intel.com,
Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: Introduce BOOT_EFI and BOOT_CF9 into the reboot sequence loop
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 12:06:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53123DCF.7040500@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140301172256.GA29417@srcf.ucam.org>
On 03/01/2014 09:22 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:10:46AM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
>> Peter - Can you please clarify writing to cf9 caused some system hang.
>> If CF9 is the last way to try, that means ACPI, KBD takes no effect,
>> then if no CF9, the system hangs there in infinite for() loop. If CF9
>> is there, that means CF9 takes no effect as well, CF9 does *NOT* cause
>> system hang, right? If the answer is no, can you please point me which
>> system hangs by CF9. I'd like to investigate what the ACPI reboot
>> vectors look like on these systems.
>
> I think I'm fine with cf9 being in there as long as it comes after the
> ACPI calls and as long as we're using either conf1 or conf2 access.
>
Be careful. This is *exactly* what I tried back in checkin
14d7ca5c575853664d8fe4f225a77b8df1b7de7d. We had to back that out quite
quickly.
This was before we had the Link: tags pointing back to the LKML
discussion, but the date (2008-11-11) and title of the patch should give
a good hint for finding the discussion I would think.
x86: attempt reboot via port CF9 if we have standard PCI ports
Impact: Changes reboot behavior.
If port CF9 seems to be safe to touch, attempt it before trying the
keyboard controller. Port CF9 is not available on all chipsets (a
significant but decreasing number of modern chipsets don't implement
it), but port CF9 itself should in general be safe to poke (no ill
effects if unimplemented) on any system which has PCI Configuration
Method #1 or #2, as it falls inside the PCI configuration port range
in both cases. No chipset without PCI is known to have port CF9,
either, although an explicit "pci=bios" would mean we miss this and
therefore don't use port CF9. An explicit "reboot=pci" can be used to
force the use of port CF9.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 4:11 [patch] x86: Introduce BOOT_EFI and BOOT_CF9 into the reboot sequence loop Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 4:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-28 5:22 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 5:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-28 6:07 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 6:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-28 6:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 6:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-28 6:39 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 6:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-28 6:54 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 17:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-28 22:11 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-02-28 22:16 ` Adam Williamson
2014-03-01 17:10 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-01 17:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-01 17:31 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-01 18:19 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-01 19:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-02 0:15 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-01 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-03-01 20:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-01 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 0:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 0:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 1:47 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 2:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 2:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 2:23 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-02 2:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 10:39 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 16:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-02 22:13 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 22:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-02 22:45 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 23:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-02 23:23 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-03 0:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-03 0:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-03 1:36 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-03 1:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-03 1:49 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-03 22:11 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-03-02 23:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-05 23:39 ` [tip:x86/reboot] x86, reboot: Add EFI and CF9 reboot methods into the default list tip-bot for Li, Aubrey
2014-03-05 23:45 ` [tip:x86/reboot] x86, reboot: Only use CF9_COND automatically, not CF9 tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53123DCF.7040500@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Len.Brown@intel.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=awilliam@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.