[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[Pradeep Reddy]

Kathiravan,

There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.

--
Pradeep
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140411/c3988888/attachment.htm 

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[Kathiravan]

Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> 
>     Kathiravan,
>         There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
>         --
>         Pradeep
>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
> 

Hi Pradeep,
    So u r telling i cant able to proceed with this( cant i generate those
action frames mentioned in 802.11k)?? any patches can i get or any other
module like ath10k supports??? please give some suggestions on this!!!
      

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[Kathiravan]

Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> 
>     Kathiravan,
>         There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
>         --
>         Pradeep
>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
> 


Hi Pradeep,

Thanks much for your prompt reply.
I just want to understand if there is any dependency on firmware for
implementation of 802.11k.

What i understand is that we need to send the action frame command to the
firmware and the firmware takes the initiative to send the packet OTA.
Is my understanding correct?

For example to send the ADDBA request the below is the command which we send
to the firmware.

#define HostCmd_CMD_11N_ADDBA_REQ                     0x00ce

For 802.11k implementation i reckon the corresponding Action command to be
present in the firmware to support this feature.Am i right?

Looking forward for your valuable comments.

Regards,
Kathiravan T.

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[Oleksij Rempel]

Am 11.04.2014 12:19, schrieb Kathiravan:
> Pradeep Reddy <pradeepreddy.iit <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>
>>
>>     Kathiravan,
>>         There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k.
>>         --
>>         Pradeep
>>   
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath9k-devel mailing list
>> ath9k-devel <at> lists.ath9k.org
>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>>
> 
> 
> Hi Pradeep,
> 
> Thanks much for your prompt reply.
> I just want to understand if there is any dependency on firmware for
> implementation of 802.11k.

there is no firmware in ath9k. Only ath9k-htc need firmware. So, which
driver do you mean?

> What i understand is that we need to send the action frame command to the
> firmware and the firmware takes the initiative to send the packet OTA.
> Is my understanding correct?
> 
> For example to send the ADDBA request the below is the command which we send
> to the firmware.
> 
> #define HostCmd_CMD_11N_ADDBA_REQ                     0x00ce
> 
> For 802.11k implementation i reckon the corresponding Action command to be
> present in the firmware to support this feature.Am i right?
> 
> Looking forward for your valuable comments.
> 
> Regards,
> Kathiravan T.



-- 
Regards,
Oleksij

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 278 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140411/c4f9ceb6/attachment.pgp 

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[kathiravan T]

Hi Oleksij Rempel,
 
I am working on ath9k.

Regards,
Kathiravan T.

[ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan)

[selvam]

Hi Kathiravan,

Looks like subset of 802.11k is implemented. Please refer below link for
more information.

http://pages.cs.aueb.gr/~pfrag/software.php

Best Regards,
Selvam T



On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:14 AM, kathiravan T <
t.kathiravan@globaledgesoft.com> wrote:

> Hi Oleksij Rempel,
>
> I am working on ath9k.
>
> Regards,
> Kathiravan T.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>



-- 
Regards,
Selvam.T
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140415/805a9aa9/attachment-0001.htm