All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/7] sched,numa: remove task_h_load from task_numa_compare
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:39:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AA608F.50301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140625053138.GF6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/25/2014 01:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:25:00AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 06/25/2014 01:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:07:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra
>>> wrote:
>>>> Shall I merge this into patch 3?
>>> 
>>> Which gets me the below; which is has a wrong changelog.
>>> 
>>> task_h_load() already computes the load as seen from the root 
>>> group. effective_load() just does a better (and more expensive)
>>> job of computing the task movement implications of a move.
>>> 
>>> So the total effect of this patch shouldn't be very big;
>>> regular load balancing also only uses task_h_load(), see
>>> move_tasks().
>>> 
>>> Now, we don't run with preemption disabled, don't run as
>>> often, etc.., so maybe we can indeed use the more expensive
>>> variant just fine, but does it really matter?
>> 
>> In my testing, it appears to make a difference between workloads 
>> converging, and workloads sitting with one last thread stuck on 
>> another node that never gets moved...
> 
> Fair enough; can you provide a new Changelog that I can paste in?

Here it goes:

When CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is enabled, the load that a task places
on a CPU is determined by the group the task is in. The active groups
on the source and destination CPU can be different, resulting in a
different load contribution by the same task at its source and at its
destination. As a result, the load needs to be calculated separately
for each CPU, instead of estimated once with task_h_load.

Getting this calculation right allows some workloads to converge,
where previously the last thread could get stuck on another node,
without being able to migrate to its final destination.




- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTqmCPAAoJEM553pKExN6D4/IH/1Ez7G3jAnYFpQYvH/wSm75V
kbH+mouLAqeICjHRdXAr1SGuD8i85JeUeDU2+SymdhC+hwZXbvR/aQfX0/ok4kN7
e7kJbaNS6Lrq3bDjm74aTpMKB+zK2OExqR1DQBXwynbUahAyx3+9uXNDYp35yZwo
tt+h3Rdrmy2lTTpE0fuEjGc8ODrEJjeWyYAVxT/aQXnwgfXfp6BZ1SEXyRRmrxR0
BunsgWTO7uBxGGEIZrrm/l7mdIrsi4oAN9C4RA7v6LMR6cUW9Fj5o6iva9X714wG
txP4/AGowucS5VckN1RIaM8/pzMB3MVuAmCTX4PqWg1jf3eggcQpe5/4/bVYUqQ=
=QgYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-23 15:41 [PATCH 0/7] sched,numa: improve NUMA convergence times riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched,numa: use group's max nid as task's preferred nid riel
2014-06-25 10:31   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-05 10:44   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Use group's max nid as task' s " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched,numa: use effective_load to balance NUMA loads riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched,numa: simplify task_numa_compare riel
2014-06-25 10:39   ` Mel Gorman
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched,numa: examine a task move when examining a task swap riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched,numa: rework best node setting in task_numa_migrate riel
2014-07-05 10:45   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Rework best node setting in task_numa_migrate() tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 15:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched,numa: change scan period code to match intent riel
2014-06-25 10:19   ` Mel Gorman
2014-07-05 10:45   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Change " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 8/7] sched,numa: do not let a move increase the imbalance Rik van Riel
2014-06-24 14:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 15:30     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  1:57     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-24 19:14 ` [PATCH 9/7] sched,numa: remove task_h_load from task_numa_compare Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:09     ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:25       ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-25  5:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-25  5:39           ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-06-25  5:57             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53AA608F.50301@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.