* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
@ 2014-08-04 15:56 Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-04 16:10 ` Marcin Gibuła
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2014-08-04 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei, Marcin Gibuła, Stefan Hajnoczi
If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
to happen with the mirror blockjob.
This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
block/linux-aio.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c
index 7ac7e8c..9aca758 100644
--- a/block/linux-aio.c
+++ b/block/linux-aio.c
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ struct qemu_laio_state {
/* io queue for submit at batch */
LaioQueue io_q;
+
+ /* I/O completion processing */
+ QEMUBH *completion_bh;
+ struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
+ int event_idx;
+ int event_max;
};
static inline ssize_t io_event_ret(struct io_event *ev)
@@ -86,27 +92,58 @@ static void qemu_laio_process_completion(struct qemu_laio_state *s,
qemu_aio_release(laiocb);
}
-static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
+/* The completion BH fetches completed I/O requests and invokes their
+ * callbacks.
+ *
+ * The function is somewhat tricky because it supports nested event loops, for
+ * example when a request callback invokes aio_poll(). In order to do this,
+ * the completion events array and index are kept in qemu_laio_state. The BH
+ * reschedules itself as long as there are completions pending so it will
+ * either be called again in a nested event loop or will be called after all
+ * events have been completed. When there are no events left to complete, the
+ * BH returns without rescheduling.
+ */
+static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque)
{
- struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e);
-
- while (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) {
- struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
- struct timespec ts = { 0 };
- int nevents, i;
+ struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque;
+ /* Fetch more completion events when empty */
+ if (s->event_idx == s->event_max) {
do {
- nevents = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS, events, &ts);
- } while (nevents == -EINTR);
+ struct timespec ts = { 0 };
+ s->event_max = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS,
+ s->events, &ts);
+ } while (s->event_max == -EINTR);
+
+ s->event_idx = 0;
+ if (s->event_max <= 0) {
+ s->event_max = 0;
+ return; /* no more events */
+ }
+ }
- for (i = 0; i < nevents; i++) {
- struct iocb *iocb = events[i].obj;
- struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
- container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
+ /* Reschedule so nested event loops see currently pending completions */
+ qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh);
- laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&events[i]);
- qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
- }
+ /* Process completion events */
+ while (s->event_idx < s->event_max) {
+ struct iocb *iocb = s->events[s->event_idx].obj;
+ struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
+ container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
+
+ laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&s->events[s->event_idx]);
+ s->event_idx++;
+
+ qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
+ }
+}
+
+static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
+{
+ struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e);
+
+ if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) {
+ qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh);
}
}
@@ -272,12 +309,14 @@ void laio_detach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *old_context)
struct qemu_laio_state *s = s_;
aio_set_event_notifier(old_context, &s->e, NULL);
+ qemu_bh_delete(s->completion_bh);
}
void laio_attach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *new_context)
{
struct qemu_laio_state *s = s_;
+ s->completion_bh = aio_bh_new(new_context, qemu_laio_completion_bh, s);
aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->e, qemu_laio_completion_cb);
}
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2014-08-04 16:10 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 10:44 ` Ming Lei
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Gibuła @ 2014-08-04 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei
W dniu 2014-08-04 17:56, Stefan Hajnoczi pisze:
> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
s/mirror/commit/
> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
I'll test it tomorrow.
--
mg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-04 16:10 ` Marcin Gibuła
@ 2014-08-05 10:44 ` Ming Lei
2014-08-05 13:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-05 14:26 ` Marcin Gibuła
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2014-08-05 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Marcin Gibuła, qemu-devel
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
>
> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/linux-aio.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c
> index 7ac7e8c..9aca758 100644
> --- a/block/linux-aio.c
> +++ b/block/linux-aio.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ struct qemu_laio_state {
>
> /* io queue for submit at batch */
> LaioQueue io_q;
> +
> + /* I/O completion processing */
> + QEMUBH *completion_bh;
> + struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
> + int event_idx;
> + int event_max;
> };
>
> static inline ssize_t io_event_ret(struct io_event *ev)
> @@ -86,27 +92,58 @@ static void qemu_laio_process_completion(struct qemu_laio_state *s,
> qemu_aio_release(laiocb);
> }
>
> -static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
> +/* The completion BH fetches completed I/O requests and invokes their
> + * callbacks.
> + *
> + * The function is somewhat tricky because it supports nested event loops, for
> + * example when a request callback invokes aio_poll(). In order to do this,
Looks it is a very tricky usage, maybe it is better to change the caller.
> + * the completion events array and index are kept in qemu_laio_state. The BH
> + * reschedules itself as long as there are completions pending so it will
> + * either be called again in a nested event loop or will be called after all
> + * events have been completed. When there are no events left to complete, the
> + * BH returns without rescheduling.
> + */
> +static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque)
> {
> - struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e);
> -
> - while (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) {
> - struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
> - struct timespec ts = { 0 };
> - int nevents, i;
> + struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque;
>
> + /* Fetch more completion events when empty */
> + if (s->event_idx == s->event_max) {
> do {
> - nevents = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS, events, &ts);
> - } while (nevents == -EINTR);
> + struct timespec ts = { 0 };
> + s->event_max = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS,
> + s->events, &ts);
> + } while (s->event_max == -EINTR);
> +
> + s->event_idx = 0;
> + if (s->event_max <= 0) {
> + s->event_max = 0;
> + return; /* no more events */
> + }
> + }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nevents; i++) {
> - struct iocb *iocb = events[i].obj;
> - struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
> - container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
> + /* Reschedule so nested event loops see currently pending completions */
> + qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh);
>
> - laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&events[i]);
> - qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
> - }
> + /* Process completion events */
> + while (s->event_idx < s->event_max) {
> + struct iocb *iocb = s->events[s->event_idx].obj;
> + struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
> + container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
> +
> + laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&s->events[s->event_idx]);
> + s->event_idx++;
> +
> + qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
The implementation is same tricky with the usage, :-)
Also using a FIFO style implementation should be more efficient
since IO events can still be read and completed in current BH handler
if the queue isn't full, but becomes more complicated.
Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-05 10:44 ` Ming Lei
@ 2014-08-05 13:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2014-08-05 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Marcin Gibuła, qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5582 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 06:44:25PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> > io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> > for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> > to happen with the mirror blockjob.
> >
> > This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> > Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> > will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> > Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> > Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/linux-aio.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c
> > index 7ac7e8c..9aca758 100644
> > --- a/block/linux-aio.c
> > +++ b/block/linux-aio.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ struct qemu_laio_state {
> >
> > /* io queue for submit at batch */
> > LaioQueue io_q;
> > +
> > + /* I/O completion processing */
> > + QEMUBH *completion_bh;
> > + struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
> > + int event_idx;
> > + int event_max;
> > };
> >
> > static inline ssize_t io_event_ret(struct io_event *ev)
> > @@ -86,27 +92,58 @@ static void qemu_laio_process_completion(struct qemu_laio_state *s,
> > qemu_aio_release(laiocb);
> > }
> >
> > -static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e)
> > +/* The completion BH fetches completed I/O requests and invokes their
> > + * callbacks.
> > + *
> > + * The function is somewhat tricky because it supports nested event loops, for
> > + * example when a request callback invokes aio_poll(). In order to do this,
>
> Looks it is a very tricky usage, maybe it is better to change the caller.
This comment is not about usage. It's just for people reading the
implementation. I can move it inside the function body, if you like.
I like the idea of eliminating nested event loops, but it requires a
huge change: making all callers either async (using callbacks) or
coroutines so they can yield.
There are many callers so this is a lot of work and will have
side-effects too.
BTW, here is the thread-pool.c fix which is analogous to this patch:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-07/msg02437.html
> > + * the completion events array and index are kept in qemu_laio_state. The BH
> > + * reschedules itself as long as there are completions pending so it will
> > + * either be called again in a nested event loop or will be called after all
> > + * events have been completed. When there are no events left to complete, the
> > + * BH returns without rescheduling.
> > + */
> > +static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque)
> > {
> > - struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e);
> > -
> > - while (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) {
> > - struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
> > - struct timespec ts = { 0 };
> > - int nevents, i;
> > + struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque;
> >
> > + /* Fetch more completion events when empty */
> > + if (s->event_idx == s->event_max) {
> > do {
> > - nevents = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS, events, &ts);
> > - } while (nevents == -EINTR);
> > + struct timespec ts = { 0 };
> > + s->event_max = io_getevents(s->ctx, MAX_EVENTS, MAX_EVENTS,
> > + s->events, &ts);
> > + } while (s->event_max == -EINTR);
> > +
> > + s->event_idx = 0;
> > + if (s->event_max <= 0) {
> > + s->event_max = 0;
> > + return; /* no more events */
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < nevents; i++) {
> > - struct iocb *iocb = events[i].obj;
> > - struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
> > - container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
> > + /* Reschedule so nested event loops see currently pending completions */
> > + qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh);
> >
> > - laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&events[i]);
> > - qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
> > - }
> > + /* Process completion events */
> > + while (s->event_idx < s->event_max) {
> > + struct iocb *iocb = s->events[s->event_idx].obj;
> > + struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb =
> > + container_of(iocb, struct qemu_laiocb, iocb);
> > +
> > + laiocb->ret = io_event_ret(&s->events[s->event_idx]);
> > + s->event_idx++;
> > +
> > + qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb);
>
> The implementation is same tricky with the usage, :-)
>
> Also using a FIFO style implementation should be more efficient
> since IO events can still be read and completed in current BH handler
> if the queue isn't full, but becomes more complicated.
That might help but should be benchmarked.
Another trick is calling qemu_laio_completion_bh() directly from
qemu_laio_completion_cb() to avoid a BH iteration.
I think they are premature optimization. Let's first agree whether this
fix is correct or not :).
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-04 16:10 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 10:44 ` Ming Lei
@ 2014-08-05 14:26 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 14:48 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 17:33 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-29 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Gibuła @ 2014-08-05 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei
On 04.08.2014 17:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
>
> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Still hangs...
Backtrace still looks like this:
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f3d5313a900 (LWP 17440)):
#0 0x00007f3d4f38f286 in ppoll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f3d5347465b in ppoll (__ss=0x0, __timeout=0x0,
__nfds=<optimized out>, __fds=<optimized out>) at
/usr/include/bits/poll2.h:77
#2 qemu_poll_ns (fds=<optimized out>, nfds=<optimized out>,
timeout=<optimized out>)
at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/qemu-timer.c:314
#3 0x00007f3d53475970 in aio_poll (ctx=ctx@entry=0x7f3d54270c00,
blocking=blocking@entry=true)
at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/aio-posix.c:250
#4 0x00007f3d534695e7 in bdrv_drain_all () at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block.c:1924
#5 0x00007f3d5346fe1f in bdrv_close (bs=bs@entry=0x7f3d5579b340) at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block.c:1820
#6 0x00007f3d53470047 in bdrv_delete (bs=0x7f3d5579b340) at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block.c:2094
#7 bdrv_unref (bs=0x7f3d5579b340) at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block.c:5376
#8 0x00007f3d5347030b in bdrv_drop_intermediate
(active=active@entry=0x7f3d54635e20, top=top@entry=0x7f3d5579b340,
base=base@entry=0x7f3d54d956b0,
backing_file_str=0x7f3d54d95700
"/mnt/nfs/volumes/7c13c27f-0c48-4676-b075-6e8a3325383e/3785abe6-d2df-49da-9cba-e15cfce8e2af.qcow2")
at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block.c:2643
#9 0x00007f3d5335121a in commit_run (opaque=0x7f3d545cdac0) at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/block/commit.c:145
#10 0x00007f3d5347ebca in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>,
i1=<optimized out>)
at
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-2.1.0/work/qemu-2.1.0/coroutine-ucontext.c:118
#11 0x00007f3d4f2f49f0 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#12 0x00007fff27d5ef50 in ?? ()
#13 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
--
mg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-05 14:26 ` Marcin Gibuła
@ 2014-08-05 14:48 ` Marcin Gibuła
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Gibuła @ 2014-08-05 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei
On 05.08.2014 16:26, Marcin Gibuła wrote:
> On 04.08.2014 17:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
>> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
>> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
>> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
>>
>> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
>> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
>> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>>
>> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
>> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
>> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>
> Still hangs...
I'm sorry, ignore this comment.
I've built my test qemu without aio support. Retesting now.
--
mg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-05 14:26 ` Marcin Gibuła
@ 2014-08-05 17:33 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-29 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Gibuła @ 2014-08-05 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei
W dniu 2014-08-04 17:56, Stefan Hajnoczi pisze:
> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
>
> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the block-commit hang when using linux-aio, so:
Tested-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
--
mg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-05 17:33 ` Marcin Gibuła
@ 2014-08-29 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2014-08-29 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: Kevin Wolf, Paolo Bonzini, Ming Lei, Marcin Gibuła, qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1026 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> If two Linux AIO request completions are fetched in the same
> io_getevents() call, QEMU will deadlock if request A's callback waits
> for request B to complete using an aio_poll() loop. This was reported
> to happen with the mirror blockjob.
>
> This patch moves completion processing into a BH and makes it resumable.
> Nested event loops can resume completion processing so that request B
> will complete and the deadlock will not occur.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Cc: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Reported-by: Marcin Gibuła <m.gibula@beyond.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/linux-aio.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Applied to my block tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-29 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-04 15:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-aio: avoid deadlock in nested aio_poll() calls Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-04 16:10 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 10:44 ` Ming Lei
2014-08-05 13:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-05 14:26 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 14:48 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-05 17:33 ` Marcin Gibuła
2014-08-29 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.