All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings?
@ 2014-08-21  5:25 Heiko Schocher
  2014-08-22 12:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2014-08-21  5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hello Lukasz,

In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:

bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
U-Boot to 2.

bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
U-Boot to 2.

bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in binary coded decimal -> 0110h)
Currently set to 0x200

If I look in ./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:

static const struct usb_qualifier_descriptor dev_qualifier = {
         .bLength =              sizeof dev_qualifier,
         .bDescriptorType =      USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER,
         .bcdUSB =               __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200),
         .bDeviceClass =         USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC,
         .bNumConfigurations =   1,
};

bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC = 0xff ?

   Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 = USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE?
   2 is USB_CLASS_COMM ... which seems more appropriate ...

bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
bcdUSB = 0x0200 which should be 0x0110 ... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1
specification it should be 0x0110 but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is the
spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?

Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them
to the values specified in the spec?

Thanks!

bye,
Heiko

[1]: http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/DFU_1.1.pdf
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings?
  2014-08-21  5:25 [U-Boot] dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings? Heiko Schocher
@ 2014-08-22 12:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
  2014-08-25  5:49   ` Heiko Schocher
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lukasz Majewski @ 2014-08-22 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Heiko,

> Hello Lukasz,
> 
> In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:
> 
> bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
> U-Boot to 2.
> 
> bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
> U-Boot to 2.
> 
> bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in
> binary coded decimal -> 0110h) Currently set to 0x200
> 
> If I look in ./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:
> 
> static const struct usb_qualifier_descriptor dev_qualifier = {
>          .bLength =              sizeof dev_qualifier,
>          .bDescriptorType =      USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER,
>          .bcdUSB =               __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200),
>          .bDeviceClass =         USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC,
>          .bNumConfigurations =   1,
> };
> 
> bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC = 0xff ?
> 
>    Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 =
> USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE? 2 is USB_CLASS_COMM ... which seems more
> appropriate ...

The bDeviceClass seems to be set to wrong value. I think that it should
have values as they are specified by the standard.

> 
> bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
> bcdUSB = 0x0200 which should be 0x0110 ... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1
> specification it should be 0x0110 but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is
> the spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?

The 2.0 value is a reminiscent of the original DFU code (once prepared
for Linux) and was wrongly set to indicate USB 2.0. 

I think that we should have 0x0110, which indicates supported DFU
version 1.1.

> 
> Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them
> to the values specified in the spec?

I think that values which you have pointed out are wrong and should be
changed to the one from spec.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> bye,
> Heiko
> 
> [1]: http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/DFU_1.1.pdf



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings?
  2014-08-22 12:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
@ 2014-08-25  5:49   ` Heiko Schocher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2014-08-25  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hello Lukasz,

Am 22.08.2014 14:11, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> Hi Heiko,
>
>> Hello Lukasz,
>>
>> In the dfu spez [1] chapter 4.2.1 the following fields are specified:
>>
>> bDeviceClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
>> U-Boot to 2.
>>
>> bDeviceSubClass = 00h (Description: ?see interface?), currently set in
>> U-Boot to 2.
>>
>> bcdUSB = xxxxh (Description: USB specification release number in
>> binary coded decimal ->  0110h) Currently set to 0x200
>>
>> If I look in ./drivers/usb/gadget/f_dfu.c:
>>
>> static const struct usb_qualifier_descriptor dev_qualifier = {
>>           .bLength =              sizeof dev_qualifier,
>>           .bDescriptorType =      USB_DT_DEVICE_QUALIFIER,
>>           .bcdUSB =               __constant_cpu_to_le16(0x0200),
>>           .bDeviceClass =         USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC,
>>           .bNumConfigurations =   1,
>> };
>>
>> bDeviceClass = USB_CLASS_VENDOR_SPEC = 0xff ?
>>
>>     Hmm... why states the doc this should be set to 0 =
>> USB_CLASS_PER_INTERFACE? 2 is USB_CLASS_COMM ... which seems more
>> appropriate ...
>
> The bDeviceClass seems to be set to wrong value. I think that it should
> have values as they are specified by the standard.
>
>>
>> bDeviceSubClass is not defined ...
>> bcdUSB = 0x0200 which should be 0x0110 ... oh, as [1] is the dfu 1.1
>> specification it should be 0x0110 but the spec [1] says 0100 ... is
>> the spec here buggy? is there a dfu 2.0 specification availiable?
>
> The 2.0 value is a reminiscent of the original DFU code (once prepared
> for Linux) and was wrongly set to indicate USB 2.0.
>
> I think that we should have 0x0110, which indicates supported DFU
> version 1.1.
>
>>
>> Has this differences to the spec some reason? Or can we change them
>> to the values specified in the spec?
>
> I think that values which you have pointed out are wrong and should be
> changed to the one from spec.

Thanks! Changed. I send a patch soon.

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-25  5:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-21  5:25 [U-Boot] dfu: some wrong usb_qualifier_descriptor settings? Heiko Schocher
2014-08-22 12:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-08-25  5:49   ` Heiko Schocher

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.