All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster
@ 2014-07-29 14:43 Patrick Reynolds
  2014-07-29 17:46 ` Jeff King
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Reynolds @ 2014-07-29 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Git

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3797 bytes --]

Remotes are stored as an array, so looking one up or adding one without
duplication is an O(n) operation.  Reading an entire config file full of
remotes is O(n^2) in the number of remotes.  For a repository with tens of
thousands of remotes, the running time can hit multiple minutes.

Hash tables are way faster.  So we add a hashmap from remote name to
struct remote and use it for all lookups.  The time to add a new remote to
a repo that already has 50,000 remotes drops from ~2 minutes to < 1
second.

We retain the old array of remotes so iterators proceed in config-file
order.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Reynolds <patrick.reynolds@github.com>
---
mark function with no arguments as taking void

 remote.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 remote.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index a0701f6..52533e4 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct rewrites {
 static struct remote **remotes;
 static int remotes_alloc;
 static int remotes_nr;
+static struct hashmap remotes_hash;
 
 static struct branch **branches;
 static int branches_alloc;
@@ -136,26 +137,51 @@ static void add_url_alias(struct remote *remote, const char *url)
 	add_pushurl_alias(remote, url);
 }
 
+struct remotes_hash_key {
+	const char *str;
+	int len;
+};
+
+static int remotes_hash_cmp(const struct remote *a, const struct remote *b, const struct remotes_hash_key *key)
+{
+	if (key)
+		return strncmp(a->name, key->str, key->len) || a->name[key->len];
+	else
+		return strcmp(a->name, b->name);
+}
+
+static inline void init_remotes_hash(void)
+{
+	if (!remotes_hash.cmpfn)
+		hashmap_init(&remotes_hash, (hashmap_cmp_fn)remotes_hash_cmp, 0);
+}
+
 static struct remote *make_remote(const char *name, int len)
 {
-	struct remote *ret;
-	int i;
+	struct remote *ret, *replaced;
+	struct remotes_hash_key lookup;
+	struct hashmap_entry lookup_entry;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < remotes_nr; i++) {
-		if (len ? (!strncmp(name, remotes[i]->name, len) &&
-			   !remotes[i]->name[len]) :
-		    !strcmp(name, remotes[i]->name))
-			return remotes[i];
-	}
+	if (!len)
+		len = strlen(name);
+
+	init_remotes_hash();
+	lookup.str = name;
+	lookup.len = len;
+	hashmap_entry_init(&lookup_entry, memhash(name, len));
+
+	if ((ret = hashmap_get(&remotes_hash, &lookup_entry, &lookup)) != NULL)
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct remote));
 	ret->prune = -1;  /* unspecified */
 	ALLOC_GROW(remotes, remotes_nr + 1, remotes_alloc);
 	remotes[remotes_nr++] = ret;
-	if (len)
-		ret->name = xstrndup(name, len);
-	else
-		ret->name = xstrdup(name);
+	ret->name = xstrndup(name, len);
+
+	hashmap_entry_init(ret, lookup_entry.hash);
+	replaced = hashmap_put(&remotes_hash, ret);
+	assert(replaced == NULL);  /* no previous entry overwritten */
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -722,13 +748,16 @@ struct remote *pushremote_get(const char *name)
 
 int remote_is_configured(const char *name)
 {
-	int i;
+	struct remotes_hash_key lookup;
+	struct hashmap_entry lookup_entry;
 	read_config();
 
-	for (i = 0; i < remotes_nr; i++)
-		if (!strcmp(name, remotes[i]->name))
-			return 1;
-	return 0;
+	init_remotes_hash();
+	lookup.str = name;
+	lookup.len = strlen(name);
+	hashmap_entry_init(&lookup_entry, memhash(name, lookup.len));
+
+	return hashmap_get(&remotes_hash, &lookup_entry, &lookup) != NULL;
 }
 
 int for_each_remote(each_remote_fn fn, void *priv)
diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
index 917d383..81cb5ff 100644
--- a/remote.h
+++ b/remote.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef REMOTE_H
 #define REMOTE_H
 
+#include "hashmap.h"
 #include "parse-options.h"
 
 enum {
@@ -10,6 +11,8 @@ enum {
 };
 
 struct remote {
+	struct hashmap_entry ent;  /* must be first */
+
 	const char *name;
 	int origin;
 
-- 
2.0.0.rc4



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster
  2014-07-29 14:43 [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster Patrick Reynolds
@ 2014-07-29 17:46 ` Jeff King
  2014-07-30 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
  2014-09-05  9:55 ` Stefan Beller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2014-07-29 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Reynolds; +Cc: Git

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:43:39PM +0000, Patrick Reynolds wrote:

> Remotes are stored as an array, so looking one up or adding one without
> duplication is an O(n) operation.  Reading an entire config file full of
> remotes is O(n^2) in the number of remotes.  For a repository with tens of
> thousands of remotes, the running time can hit multiple minutes.
> 
> Hash tables are way faster.  So we add a hashmap from remote name to
> struct remote and use it for all lookups.  The time to add a new remote to
> a repo that already has 50,000 remotes drops from ~2 minutes to < 1
> second.
> 
> We retain the old array of remotes so iterators proceed in config-file
> order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Reynolds <patrick.reynolds@github.com>

As observers might have guessed, I already reviewed this off-list, but
to make it clear:

  Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster
  2014-07-29 14:43 [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster Patrick Reynolds
  2014-07-29 17:46 ` Jeff King
@ 2014-07-30 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
  2014-09-05  9:55 ` Stefan Beller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2014-07-30 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Reynolds; +Cc: Git

Please don't do this:

    Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----MIME delimiter for sendEmail-128858.688128279"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster
  2014-07-29 14:43 [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster Patrick Reynolds
  2014-07-29 17:46 ` Jeff King
  2014-07-30 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2014-09-05  9:55 ` Stefan Beller
  2014-09-05 15:16   ` Jeff King
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Beller @ 2014-09-05  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Reynolds, Git, Jeff King

On 29.07.2014 16:43, Patrick Reynolds wrote:
> Remotes are stored as an array, so looking one up or adding one without
> duplication is an O(n) operation.  Reading an entire config file full of
> remotes is O(n^2) in the number of remotes.  For a repository with tens of
> thousands of remotes, the running time can hit multiple minutes.
> 
> Hash tables are way faster.  So we add a hashmap from remote name to
> struct remote and use it for all lookups.  The time to add a new remote to
> a repo that already has 50,000 remotes drops from ~2 minutes to < 1
> second.
> 
> We retain the old array of remotes so iterators proceed in config-file
> order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Reynolds <patrick.reynolds@github.com>
> ---
> mark function with no arguments as taking void
> 
>  remote.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  remote.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index a0701f6..52533e4 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct rewrites {
>  static struct remote **remotes;
>  static int remotes_alloc;
>  static int remotes_nr;
> +static struct hashmap remotes_hash;
>  
>  static struct branch **branches;
>  static int branches_alloc;
> @@ -136,26 +137,51 @@ static void add_url_alias(struct remote *remote, const char *url)
>  	add_pushurl_alias(remote, url);
>  }
>  
> +struct remotes_hash_key {
> +	const char *str;
> +	int len;
> +};
> +
> +static int remotes_hash_cmp(const struct remote *a, const struct remote *b, const struct remotes_hash_key *key)
> +{
> +	if (key)
> +		return strncmp(a->name, key->str, key->len) || a->name[key->len];
> +	else
> +		return strcmp(a->name, b->name);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void init_remotes_hash(void)
> +{
> +	if (!remotes_hash.cmpfn)
> +		hashmap_init(&remotes_hash, (hashmap_cmp_fn)remotes_hash_cmp, 0);
> +}
> +
>  static struct remote *make_remote(const char *name, int len)
>  {
> -	struct remote *ret;
> -	int i;
> +	struct remote *ret, *replaced;
> +	struct remotes_hash_key lookup;
> +	struct hashmap_entry lookup_entry;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < remotes_nr; i++) {
> -		if (len ? (!strncmp(name, remotes[i]->name, len) &&
> -			   !remotes[i]->name[len]) :
> -		    !strcmp(name, remotes[i]->name))
> -			return remotes[i];
> -	}
> +	if (!len)
> +		len = strlen(name);
> +
> +	init_remotes_hash();
> +	lookup.str = name;
> +	lookup.len = len;
> +	hashmap_entry_init(&lookup_entry, memhash(name, len));
> +
> +	if ((ret = hashmap_get(&remotes_hash, &lookup_entry, &lookup)) != NULL)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	ret = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct remote));
>  	ret->prune = -1;  /* unspecified */
>  	ALLOC_GROW(remotes, remotes_nr + 1, remotes_alloc);
>  	remotes[remotes_nr++] = ret;
> -	if (len)
> -		ret->name = xstrndup(name, len);
> -	else
> -		ret->name = xstrdup(name);
> +	ret->name = xstrndup(name, len);
> +
> +	hashmap_entry_init(ret, lookup_entry.hash);
> +	replaced = hashmap_put(&remotes_hash, ret);
> +	assert(replaced == NULL);  /* no previous entry overwritten */
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -722,13 +748,16 @@ struct remote *pushremote_get(const char *name)
>  
>  int remote_is_configured(const char *name)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	struct remotes_hash_key lookup;
> +	struct hashmap_entry lookup_entry;
>  	read_config();
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < remotes_nr; i++)
> -		if (!strcmp(name, remotes[i]->name))
> -			return 1;
> -	return 0;
> +	init_remotes_hash();
> +	lookup.str = name;
> +	lookup.len = strlen(name);
> +	hashmap_entry_init(&lookup_entry, memhash(name, lookup.len));
> +
> +	return hashmap_get(&remotes_hash, &lookup_entry, &lookup) != NULL;
>  }
>  
>  int for_each_remote(each_remote_fn fn, void *priv)
> diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
> index 917d383..81cb5ff 100644
> --- a/remote.h
> +++ b/remote.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  #ifndef REMOTE_H
>  #define REMOTE_H
>  
> +#include "hashmap.h"
>  #include "parse-options.h"
>  
>  enum {
> @@ -10,6 +11,8 @@ enum {
>  };
>  
>  struct remote {
> +	struct hashmap_entry ent;  /* must be first */
> +

I stumbled about this comment  "/* must be first */"
when reading the changelog.

Why does it need to be first?
Is it a common reason I'm just not aware of,
or would it make sense to put the reason into the comment as well?

Thanks,
Stefan

>  	const char *name;
>  	int origin;
>  
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster
  2014-09-05  9:55 ` Stefan Beller
@ 2014-09-05 15:16   ` Jeff King
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2014-09-05 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Beller; +Cc: Patrick Reynolds, Git

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:55:06AM +0200, Stefan Beller wrote:

> >  struct remote {
> > +	struct hashmap_entry ent;  /* must be first */
> > +
> 
> I stumbled about this comment  "/* must be first */"
> when reading the changelog.
> 
> Why does it need to be first?
> Is it a common reason I'm just not aware of,
> or would it make sense to put the reason into the comment as well?

Yes, it's a requirement of the hashmap code. It stores arbitrary
structs, but uses the front of the type for its bookkeeping data (the
hash and a linked list pointer to the next item in the bucket). This is
documented in Documentation/technical/api-hashmap.txt.

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-05 15:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-29 14:43 [PATCH v2] use a hashmap to make remotes faster Patrick Reynolds
2014-07-29 17:46 ` Jeff King
2014-07-30 18:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-05  9:55 ` Stefan Beller
2014-09-05 15:16   ` Jeff King

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.