From: Eric Sesterhenn <eric.sesterhenn@lsexperts.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Conrad Kostecki <ck@conrad-kostecki.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:41:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5412BFAF.7050900@lsexperts.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540F1C43.2080708@zytor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
hi,
On 09/09/2014 05:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 07:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> @hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.
>>
>> According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
>> and always memory mapped to 0xfed00000. I don't see how that would
>> harm any machine which has the hpet proper advertised via ACPI.
>>
>
> That seems straightforward then.
this means the original patch written by Conrad is going to be applied?
Is there anything we can do to help regarding this issue?
> I still wish someone would take a cluebat to Soekris. We keep hearing
> crap like this about their firmware over and over and over again. It
> isn't like you can't get EDK2 or Coreboot and build a BIOS based mostly
> on Open Source components these days... oh, wait.
I have send them another message regarding this issue, but so far
they did not respond. In the past their responsiveness also varied a lot
according to my collegue.
Regards, Eric
--
LSE Leading Security Experts GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt
Unternehmenssitz: Weiterstadt, Amtsgericht Darmstadt: HRB8649
Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel, Sven Walther
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4011 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-12 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 10:23 [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501 Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 17:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:06 ` AW: " Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:13 ` AW: " Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 18:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 19:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 19:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 21:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 21:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 16:28 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 17:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 18:23 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 18:23 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 18:47 ` AW: AW: " H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 19:25 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 19:25 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 19:40 ` AW: AW: " H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-18 18:22 ` ACPI: Also allow ACPI table adding via initrd not only overriding Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Provide support for ACPI table adding via OS Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-18 18:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:44 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-19 11:22 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-19 11:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-21 7:24 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-02-21 7:24 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-02-21 7:28 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-02-21 7:28 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPICA: Introduce new acpi_os_physical_table_add OS callback Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPICA: Add BGRT signature to known signatures Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Add new table signatures that can be overridden/added Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22 ` [Devel] " Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:38 ` [Devel] ACPI: Also allow ACPI table adding via initrd not only overriding Moore, Robert
2014-02-18 18:38 ` Moore, Robert
2014-02-18 18:52 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:52 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 19:59 ` Moore, Robert
2014-02-18 19:59 ` Moore, Robert
2014-02-19 11:14 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-19 11:14 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-19 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:28 ` AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501 Conrad Kostecki
2014-09-09 13:56 ` Eric Sesterhenn
2014-09-09 14:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-09 15:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-09 15:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-12 9:41 ` Eric Sesterhenn [this message]
2014-09-12 10:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-12 11:06 ` [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for e6xx based systems Eric Sesterhenn
2014-09-16 0:58 ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for Peter Neubauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5412BFAF.7050900@lsexperts.de \
--to=eric.sesterhenn@lsexperts.de \
--cc=ck@conrad-kostecki.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.