All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/4] net/colo-compare.c: Optimize unpredictable tcp options comparison
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:33:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5468b372-eec3-1969-e927-236859a6b079@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499925175-21218-4-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 2017年07月13日 13:52, Zhang Chen wrote:
> When network is busy, some tcp options(like sack) will unpredictable
> occur in primary side or secondary side. it will make packet size
> not same, but the two packet's payload is identical. colo just
> care about packet payload, so we skip the option field.

A question is, if SACK were not same, does it mean e.g some packet were 
lost just for primary or secondary? If yes, we will be out of sync soon. 
Is it really better to delay the checkpoint here?

Thanks

>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   net/colo-compare.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index 2caeb80..6406c4a 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,10 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
>    * return:    0  means packet same
>    *            > 0 || < 0 means packet different
>    */
> -static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
> +static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt,
> +                                      Packet *spkt,
> +                                      int poffset,
> +                                      int soffset)
>   {
>       if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
>           char pri_ip_src[20], pri_ip_dst[20], sec_ip_src[20], sec_ip_dst[20];
> @@ -198,9 +201,10 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
>                                      sec_ip_src, sec_ip_dst);
>       }
>   
> -    if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
> -        return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset, spkt->data + offset,
> -                      spkt->size - offset);
> +    if (ppkt->size == spkt->size || poffset != soffset) {
> +        return memcmp(ppkt->data + poffset,
> +                      spkt->data + soffset,
> +                      spkt->size - soffset);
>       } else {
>           trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
>           return -1;
> @@ -263,12 +267,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>        * so we just need skip this field.
>        */
>       if (ptcp->th_off > 5) {
> -        ptrdiff_t tcp_offset;
> -        tcp_offset = ppkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)ppkt->data
> +        ptrdiff_t ptcp_offset, stcp_offset;
> +
> +        ptcp_offset = ppkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)ppkt->data
>                        + (ptcp->th_off * 4);
> -        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, tcp_offset);
> +        stcp_offset = spkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)spkt->data
> +                     + (stcp->th_off * 4);
> +
> +        /*
> +         * When network is busy, some tcp options(like sack) will unpredictable
> +         * occur in primary side or secondary side. it will make packet size
> +         * not same, but the two packet's payload is identical. colo just
> +         * care about packet payload, so we skip the option field.
> +         */
> +        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ptcp_offset, stcp_offset);
>       } else if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
> -        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
> +        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN, ETH_HLEN);
>       } else {
>           res = -1;
>       }
> @@ -328,6 +342,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>        * the ip payload here.
>        */
>       ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
> +                                     network_header_length + ETH_HLEN,
>                                        network_header_length + ETH_HLEN);
>   
>       if (ret) {
> @@ -365,6 +380,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>        * the ip payload here.
>        */
>       if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
> +                                   network_header_length + ETH_HLEN,
>                                      network_header_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
>           trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
>                                              ppkt->size);
> @@ -402,7 +418,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>                                      sec_ip_src, sec_ip_dst);
>       }
>   
> -    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
> +    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0, 0);
>   }
>   
>   static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-14  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-13  5:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/4] Optimize COLO-compare performance Zhang Chen
2017-07-13  5:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/4] net/colo-compare.c: Add checkpoint min period to optimize performance Zhang Chen
2017-07-14  3:22   ` Jason Wang
2017-07-17  6:42     ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-14 12:10   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-17  9:33     ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-17 12:24       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-18  2:20         ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-13  5:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/4] net/colo-compare.c: Compare the tcp packets that has the same sequence number Zhang Chen
2017-07-14  3:25   ` Jason Wang
2017-07-17  7:39     ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-17  8:55       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-17  9:23         ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-17 10:02           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-14 12:24   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-13  5:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/4] net/colo-compare.c: Optimize unpredictable tcp options comparison Zhang Chen
2017-07-14  3:33   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-07-17  9:06     ` Zhang Chen
2017-07-13  5:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/4] net/colo-compare.c: Adjust net queue pop order for performance Zhang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5468b372-eec3-1969-e927-236859a6b079@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.