All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
few chnages in the code to make it work.

All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.

 arch/powerpc/Kconfig                  |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h |   4 +
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h |   2 +
 arch/powerpc/net/Makefile             |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h            |  47 ++++++-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S         | 229 ----------------------------------
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S        | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c       |  32 ++---
 8 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 247 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 22b0940..5084bdc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
 	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
-	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
+	select HAVE_BPF_JIT
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
 	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 22b0940..5084bdc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
 	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
 	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
 	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
-	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
+	select HAVE_BPF_JIT
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
 	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
index 21be8ae..dc85dcb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 #define PPC_STL		stringify_in_c(std)
 #define PPC_STLU	stringify_in_c(stdu)
 #define PPC_LCMPI	stringify_in_c(cmpdi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI	stringify_in_c(cmpldi)
+#define PPC_LCMP	stringify_in_c(cmpd)
 #define PPC_LONG	stringify_in_c(.llong)
 #define PPC_LONG_ALIGN	stringify_in_c(.balign 8)
 #define PPC_TLNEI	stringify_in_c(tdnei)
@@ -52,6 +54,8 @@
 #define PPC_STL		stringify_in_c(stw)
 #define PPC_STLU	stringify_in_c(stwu)
 #define PPC_LCMPI	stringify_in_c(cmpwi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI	stringify_in_c(cmplwi)
+#define PPC_LCMP	stringify_in_c(cmpw)
 #define PPC_LONG	stringify_in_c(.long)
 #define PPC_LONG_ALIGN	stringify_in_c(.balign 4)
 #define PPC_TLNEI	stringify_in_c(twnei)
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
index 21be8ae..dc85dcb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 #define PPC_STL		stringify_in_c(std)
 #define PPC_STLU	stringify_in_c(stdu)
 #define PPC_LCMPI	stringify_in_c(cmpdi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI	stringify_in_c(cmpldi)
+#define PPC_LCMP	stringify_in_c(cmpd)
 #define PPC_LONG	stringify_in_c(.llong)
 #define PPC_LONG_ALIGN	stringify_in_c(.balign 8)
 #define PPC_TLNEI	stringify_in_c(tdnei)
@@ -52,6 +54,8 @@
 #define PPC_STL		stringify_in_c(stw)
 #define PPC_STLU	stringify_in_c(stwu)
 #define PPC_LCMPI	stringify_in_c(cmpwi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI	stringify_in_c(cmplwi)
+#define PPC_LCMP	stringify_in_c(cmpw)
 #define PPC_LONG	stringify_in_c(.long)
 #define PPC_LONG_ALIGN	stringify_in_c(.balign 4)
 #define PPC_TLNEI	stringify_in_c(twnei)
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 03cd858..2eadde0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@
 #define PPC_INST_LWZ			0x80000000
 #define PPC_INST_STD			0xf8000000
 #define PPC_INST_STDU			0xf8000001
+#define PPC_INST_STW			0x90000000
+#define PPC_INST_STWU			0x94000000
 #define PPC_INST_MFLR			0x7c0802a6
 #define PPC_INST_MTLR			0x7c0803a6
 #define PPC_INST_CMPWI			0x2c000000
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 03cd858..2eadde0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@
 #define PPC_INST_LWZ			0x80000000
 #define PPC_INST_STD			0xf8000000
 #define PPC_INST_STDU			0xf8000001
+#define PPC_INST_STW			0x90000000
+#define PPC_INST_STWU			0x94000000
 #define PPC_INST_MFLR			0x7c0802a6
 #define PPC_INST_MTLR			0x7c0803a6
 #define PPC_INST_CMPWI			0x2c000000
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Use helpers from the asm-compat.h to wrap up assembly mnemonics

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h      | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S   | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 ++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index c406aa9..2d5e715 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -10,12 +10,25 @@
 #ifndef _BPF_JIT_H
 #define _BPF_JIT_H
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF	48
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	32
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC	(48+64)
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(18*8)
 #define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME	(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
 				 BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
 #define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME	(48+64)
+#else
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF	24
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	16
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC	(24+32)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(18*4)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME	(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
+				 BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
+#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME	(24+32)
+#endif
+
+#define REG_SZ         (BITS_PER_LONG/8)
 
 /*
  * Generated code register usage:
@@ -57,7 +70,11 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_half);
 DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte);
 DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 #define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE	24
+#else
+#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE	0
+#endif
 
 /*
  * 16-bit immediate helper macros: HA() is for use with sign-extending instrs
@@ -86,7 +103,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_LIS(r, i)		PPC_ADDIS(r, 0, i)
 #define PPC_STD(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STD | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
-
+#define PPC_STDU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STW(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STW | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STWU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STWU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
 
 #define PPC_LBZ(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_LBZ | ___PPC_RT(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -98,6 +120,17 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_LHBRX(r, base, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_LHBRX | ___PPC_RT(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STDU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STW(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STWU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 /* Convenience helpers for the above with 'far' offsets: */
 #define PPC_LBZ_OFFS(r, base, i) do { if ((i) < 32768) PPC_LBZ(r, base, i);   \
 		else {	PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i));			      \
@@ -115,6 +148,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 		else {	PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i));			      \
 			PPC_LHZ(r, r, IMM_L(i)); } } while(0)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_CMPWI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPDI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -196,6 +235,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 				PPC_ORI(d, d, (uintptr_t)(i) & 0xffff);	      \
 		} } while (0);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI64(d, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_LHBRX_OFFS(r, base, i) \
 		do { PPC_LI32(r, i); PPC_LHBRX(r, r, base); } while(0)
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
index 8f87d92..8ff5a3b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
  */
 	.globl	sk_load_word
 sk_load_word:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_word_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_word_positive_offset
 sk_load_word_positive_offset:
 	/* Are we accessing past headlen? */
 	subi	r_scratch1, r_HL, 4
-	cmpd	r_scratch1, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_scratch1, r_addr
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_word
 	/* Nope, just hitting the header.  cr0 here is eq or gt! */
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ sk_load_word_positive_offset:
 
 	.globl	sk_load_half
 sk_load_half:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_half_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_half_positive_offset
 sk_load_half_positive_offset:
 	subi	r_scratch1, r_HL, 2
-	cmpd	r_scratch1, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_scratch1, r_addr
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_half
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	lhbrx	r_A, r_D, r_addr
@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ sk_load_half_positive_offset:
 
 	.globl	sk_load_byte
 sk_load_byte:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_byte_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_positive_offset
 sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
-	cmpd	r_HL, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_HL, r_addr
 	ble	bpf_slow_path_byte
 	lbzx	r_A, r_D, r_addr
 	blr
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
  */
 	.globl sk_load_byte_msh
 sk_load_byte_msh:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg
 	.globl sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset
 sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
-	cmpd	r_HL, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_HL, r_addr
 	ble	bpf_slow_path_byte_msh
 	lbzx	r_X, r_D, r_addr
 	rlwinm	r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
  */
 #define bpf_slow_path_common(SIZE)				\
 	mflr	r0;						\
-	std	r0, 16(r1);					\
+	PPC_STL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
 	/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */	\
-	std	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
-	std	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	std	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
-	addi	r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8);		\
-	stdu	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	addi	r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ);		\
+	PPC_STLU	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
 	/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */				\
 	mr	r4, r_addr;					\
 	li	r6, SIZE;					\
@@ -115,19 +115,19 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
 	nop;							\
 	/* R3 = 0 on success */					\
 	addi	r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME;			\
-	ld	r0, 16(r1);					\
-	ld	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	ld	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
+	PPC_LL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
 	mtlr	r0;						\
-	cmpdi	r3, 0;						\
+	PPC_LCMPI	r3, 0;						\
 	blt	bpf_error;	/* cr0 = LT */			\
-	ld	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
 	/* Great success! */
 
 bpf_slow_path_word:
 	bpf_slow_path_common(4)
 	/* Data value is on stack, and cr0 != LT */
-	lwz	r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8)(r1)
+	lwz	r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ)(r1)
 	blr
 
 bpf_slow_path_half:
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
  */
 #define sk_negative_common(SIZE)				\
 	mflr	r0;						\
-	std	r0, 16(r1);					\
+	PPC_STL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
 	/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */	\
-	std	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
-	std	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	std	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
-	stdu	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STLU	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
 	/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */				\
 	mr	r4, r_addr;					\
 	li	r5, SIZE;					\
@@ -167,19 +167,19 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
 	nop;							\
 	/* R3 != 0 on success */				\
 	addi	r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME;			\
-	ld	r0, 16(r1);					\
-	ld	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	ld	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
+	PPC_LL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
 	mtlr	r0;						\
-	cmpldi	r3, 0;						\
+	PPC_LCMPLI	r3, 0;						\
 	beq	bpf_error_slow;	/* cr0 = EQ */			\
 	mr	r_addr, r3;					\
-	ld	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
 	/* Great success! */
 
 bpf_slow_path_word_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_word_negative_offset
 sk_load_word_negative_offset:
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ sk_load_word_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_half_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_half_negative_offset
 sk_load_half_negative_offset:
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ sk_load_half_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_byte_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_negative_offset
 sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset
 sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
 bpf_error_slow:
 	/* fabricate a cr0 = lt */
 	li	r_scratch1, -1
-	cmpdi	r_scratch1, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_scratch1, 0
 bpf_error:
 	/* Entered with cr0 = lt */
 	li	r3, 0
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d1916b5..8b29268 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler for PPC64
+/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
  *
  * Copyright 2011 Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, IBM Corporation
  *
  * Based on the x86 BPF compiler, by Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
+ * Ported to ppc32 by Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -36,11 +37,11 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
 			/* If we call any helpers (for loads), save LR */
 			EMIT(PPC_INST_MFLR | __PPC_RT(R0));
-			PPC_STD(0, 1, 16);
+			PPC_BPF_STL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
 
 			/* Back up non-volatile regs. */
-			PPC_STD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
-			PPC_STD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+			PPC_BPF_STL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+			PPC_BPF_STL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
 		}
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
 			/*
@@ -49,11 +50,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			 */
 			for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
 				if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
-					PPC_STD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+					PPC_BPF_STL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
 			}
 		}
-		EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | __PPC_RS(R1) | __PPC_RA(R1) |
-		     (-BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME & 0xfffc));
+		PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
 	}
 
 	if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 							 data_len));
 		PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r_HL, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
 		PPC_SUB(r_HL, r_HL, r_scratch1);
-		PPC_LD_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
+		PPC_LL_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
 	}
 
 	if (ctx->seen & SEEN_XREG) {
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
 	if (ctx->seen & (SEEN_MEM | SEEN_DATAREF)) {
 		PPC_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
-			PPC_LD(0, 1, 16);
+			PPC_BPF_LL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
 			PPC_MTLR(0);
-			PPC_LD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
-			PPC_LD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+			PPC_BPF_LL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+			PPC_BPF_LL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
 		}
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
 			/* Restore any saved non-vol registers */
 			for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
 				if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
-					PPC_LD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+					PPC_BPF_LL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 						ifindex) != 4);
 			BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct net_device,
 						type) != 2);
-			PPC_LD_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
+			PPC_LL_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
 								dev));
 			PPC_CMPDI(r_scratch1, 0);
 			if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 		common_load:
 			/* Load from [K]. */
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
-			PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+			PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
 			PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
 			PPC_LI32(r_addr, K);
 			PPC_BLRL();
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			 * in the helper functions.
 			 */
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG;
-			PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+			PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
 			PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
 			PPC_ADDI(r_addr, r_X, IMM_L(K));
 			if (K >= 32768)
@@ -685,9 +685,11 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 
 	if (image) {
 		bpf_flush_icache(code_base, code_base + (proglen/4));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 		/* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */
 		((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
 		((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc;
+#endif
 		fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
 		fp->jited = true;
 	}
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Use helpers from the asm-compat.h to wrap up assembly mnemonics

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h      | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S   | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 ++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index c406aa9..2d5e715 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -10,12 +10,25 @@
 #ifndef _BPF_JIT_H
 #define _BPF_JIT_H
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF	48
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	32
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC	(48+64)
 #define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(18*8)
 #define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME	(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
 				 BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
 #define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME	(48+64)
+#else
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF	24
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS	16
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC	(24+32)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE	(18*4)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME	(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
+				 BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
+#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME	(24+32)
+#endif
+
+#define REG_SZ         (BITS_PER_LONG/8)
 
 /*
  * Generated code register usage:
@@ -57,7 +70,11 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_half);
 DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte);
 DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 #define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE	24
+#else
+#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE	0
+#endif
 
 /*
  * 16-bit immediate helper macros: HA() is for use with sign-extending instrs
@@ -86,7 +103,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_LIS(r, i)		PPC_ADDIS(r, 0, i)
 #define PPC_STD(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STD | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
-
+#define PPC_STDU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STW(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STW | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STWU(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_STWU | ___PPC_RS(r) |	      \
+				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
 
 #define PPC_LBZ(r, base, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_LBZ | ___PPC_RT(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -98,6 +120,17 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_LHBRX(r, base, b)	EMIT(PPC_INST_LHBRX | ___PPC_RT(r) |	      \
 				     ___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STDU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STW(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STWU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 /* Convenience helpers for the above with 'far' offsets: */
 #define PPC_LBZ_OFFS(r, base, i) do { if ((i) < 32768) PPC_LBZ(r, base, i);   \
 		else {	PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i));			      \
@@ -115,6 +148,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 		else {	PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i));			      \
 			PPC_LHZ(r, r, IMM_L(i)); } } while(0)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_CMPWI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPDI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -196,6 +235,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 				PPC_ORI(d, d, (uintptr_t)(i) & 0xffff);	      \
 		} } while (0);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI64(d, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_LHBRX_OFFS(r, base, i) \
 		do { PPC_LI32(r, i); PPC_LHBRX(r, r, base); } while(0)
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
index 8f87d92..8ff5a3b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
  */
 	.globl	sk_load_word
 sk_load_word:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_word_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_word_positive_offset
 sk_load_word_positive_offset:
 	/* Are we accessing past headlen? */
 	subi	r_scratch1, r_HL, 4
-	cmpd	r_scratch1, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_scratch1, r_addr
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_word
 	/* Nope, just hitting the header.  cr0 here is eq or gt! */
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ sk_load_word_positive_offset:
 
 	.globl	sk_load_half
 sk_load_half:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_half_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_half_positive_offset
 sk_load_half_positive_offset:
 	subi	r_scratch1, r_HL, 2
-	cmpd	r_scratch1, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_scratch1, r_addr
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_half
 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	lhbrx	r_A, r_D, r_addr
@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ sk_load_half_positive_offset:
 
 	.globl	sk_load_byte
 sk_load_byte:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_byte_neg
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_positive_offset
 sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
-	cmpd	r_HL, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_HL, r_addr
 	ble	bpf_slow_path_byte
 	lbzx	r_A, r_D, r_addr
 	blr
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
  */
 	.globl sk_load_byte_msh
 sk_load_byte_msh:
-	cmpdi	r_addr, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_addr, 0
 	blt	bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg
 	.globl sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset
 sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
-	cmpd	r_HL, r_addr
+	PPC_LCMP	r_HL, r_addr
 	ble	bpf_slow_path_byte_msh
 	lbzx	r_X, r_D, r_addr
 	rlwinm	r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
  */
 #define bpf_slow_path_common(SIZE)				\
 	mflr	r0;						\
-	std	r0, 16(r1);					\
+	PPC_STL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
 	/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */	\
-	std	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
-	std	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	std	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
-	addi	r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8);		\
-	stdu	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	addi	r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ);		\
+	PPC_STLU	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
 	/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */				\
 	mr	r4, r_addr;					\
 	li	r6, SIZE;					\
@@ -115,19 +115,19 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
 	nop;							\
 	/* R3 = 0 on success */					\
 	addi	r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME;			\
-	ld	r0, 16(r1);					\
-	ld	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	ld	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
+	PPC_LL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
 	mtlr	r0;						\
-	cmpdi	r3, 0;						\
+	PPC_LCMPI	r3, 0;						\
 	blt	bpf_error;	/* cr0 = LT */			\
-	ld	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
 	/* Great success! */
 
 bpf_slow_path_word:
 	bpf_slow_path_common(4)
 	/* Data value is on stack, and cr0 != LT */
-	lwz	r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8)(r1)
+	lwz	r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ)(r1)
 	blr
 
 bpf_slow_path_half:
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
  */
 #define sk_negative_common(SIZE)				\
 	mflr	r0;						\
-	std	r0, 16(r1);					\
+	PPC_STL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
 	/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */	\
-	std	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
-	std	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	std	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
-	stdu	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_STLU	r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1);		\
 	/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */				\
 	mr	r4, r_addr;					\
 	li	r5, SIZE;					\
@@ -167,19 +167,19 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
 	nop;							\
 	/* R3 != 0 on success */				\
 	addi	r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME;			\
-	ld	r0, 16(r1);					\
-	ld	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1);		\
-	ld	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1);					\
+	PPC_LL	r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1);		\
 	mtlr	r0;						\
-	cmpldi	r3, 0;						\
+	PPC_LCMPLI	r3, 0;						\
 	beq	bpf_error_slow;	/* cr0 = EQ */			\
 	mr	r_addr, r3;					\
-	ld	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1);		\
+	PPC_LL	r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1);		\
 	/* Great success! */
 
 bpf_slow_path_word_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_word_negative_offset
 sk_load_word_negative_offset:
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ sk_load_word_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_half_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_half_negative_offset
 sk_load_half_negative_offset:
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ sk_load_half_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_byte_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_negative_offset
 sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
 
 bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg:
 	lis     r_scratch1,-32	/* SKF_LL_OFF */
-	cmpd	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
+	PPC_LCMP	r_addr, r_scratch1	/* addr < SKF_* */
 	blt	bpf_error	/* cr0 = LT */
 	.globl	sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset
 sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
 bpf_error_slow:
 	/* fabricate a cr0 = lt */
 	li	r_scratch1, -1
-	cmpdi	r_scratch1, 0
+	PPC_LCMPI	r_scratch1, 0
 bpf_error:
 	/* Entered with cr0 = lt */
 	li	r3, 0
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d1916b5..8b29268 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler for PPC64
+/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
  *
  * Copyright 2011 Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, IBM Corporation
  *
  * Based on the x86 BPF compiler, by Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
+ * Ported to ppc32 by Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -36,11 +37,11 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
 			/* If we call any helpers (for loads), save LR */
 			EMIT(PPC_INST_MFLR | __PPC_RT(R0));
-			PPC_STD(0, 1, 16);
+			PPC_BPF_STL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
 
 			/* Back up non-volatile regs. */
-			PPC_STD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
-			PPC_STD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+			PPC_BPF_STL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+			PPC_BPF_STL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
 		}
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
 			/*
@@ -49,11 +50,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			 */
 			for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
 				if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
-					PPC_STD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+					PPC_BPF_STL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
 			}
 		}
-		EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | __PPC_RS(R1) | __PPC_RA(R1) |
-		     (-BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME & 0xfffc));
+		PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
 	}
 
 	if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 							 data_len));
 		PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r_HL, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
 		PPC_SUB(r_HL, r_HL, r_scratch1);
-		PPC_LD_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
+		PPC_LL_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
 	}
 
 	if (ctx->seen & SEEN_XREG) {
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
 	if (ctx->seen & (SEEN_MEM | SEEN_DATAREF)) {
 		PPC_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
-			PPC_LD(0, 1, 16);
+			PPC_BPF_LL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
 			PPC_MTLR(0);
-			PPC_LD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
-			PPC_LD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+			PPC_BPF_LL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+			PPC_BPF_LL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
 		}
 		if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
 			/* Restore any saved non-vol registers */
 			for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
 				if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
-					PPC_LD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+					PPC_BPF_LL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 						ifindex) != 4);
 			BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct net_device,
 						type) != 2);
-			PPC_LD_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
+			PPC_LL_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
 								dev));
 			PPC_CMPDI(r_scratch1, 0);
 			if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 		common_load:
 			/* Load from [K]. */
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
-			PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+			PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
 			PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
 			PPC_LI32(r_addr, K);
 			PPC_BLRL();
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			 * in the helper functions.
 			 */
 			ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG;
-			PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+			PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
 			PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
 			PPC_ADDI(r_addr, r_X, IMM_L(K));
 			if (K >= 32768)
@@ -685,9 +685,11 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 
 	if (image) {
 		bpf_flush_icache(code_base, code_base + (proglen/4));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 		/* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */
 		((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
 		((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc;
+#endif
 		fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
 		fp->jited = true;
 	}
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/Makefile                        | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} | 0
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 rename arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} (100%)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
index 266b395..1306a58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 #
 # Arch-specific network modules
 #
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_64.o bpf_jit_comp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_asm.o bpf_jit_comp.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
rename to arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/Makefile                        | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} | 0
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 rename arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} (100%)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
index 266b395..1306a58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 #
 # Arch-specific network modules
 #
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_64.o bpf_jit_comp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_asm.o bpf_jit_comp.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
rename to arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +-------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 2d5e715..889fd19 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r)		\
+	do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct, paca_index) != 2);	\
+		PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, 13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));		\
+	} while (0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r)     \
+	do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct thread_info, cpu) != 4);			\
+		PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, (1 & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)),							\
+				offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu));							\
+	} while(0)
+#endif
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) do { PPC_LI(r, 0); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_CMPWI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPDI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8b29268..17cea18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -411,20 +411,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 5);
 			break;
 		case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_CPU:
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-			/*
-			 * PACA ptr is r13:
-			 * raw_smp_processor_id() = local_paca->paca_index
-			 */
-			BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct,
-						  paca_index) != 2);
-			PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, 13,
-				     offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));
-#else
-			PPC_LI(r_A, 0);
-#endif
+			PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r_A);
 			break;
-
 			/*** Absolute loads from packet header/data ***/
 		case BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS:
 			func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_word);
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev

Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +-------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 2d5e715..889fd19 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
 #define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r)		\
+	do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct, paca_index) != 2);	\
+		PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, 13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));		\
+	} while (0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r)     \
+	do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct thread_info, cpu) != 4);			\
+		PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, (1 & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)),							\
+				offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu));							\
+	} while(0)
+#endif
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) do { PPC_LI(r, 0); } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #define PPC_CMPWI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPDI(a, i)		EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i)	EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8b29268..17cea18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -411,20 +411,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
 			PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 5);
 			break;
 		case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_CPU:
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-			/*
-			 * PACA ptr is r13:
-			 * raw_smp_processor_id() = local_paca->paca_index
-			 */
-			BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct,
-						  paca_index) != 2);
-			PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, 13,
-				     offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));
-#else
-			PPC_LI(r_A, 0);
-#endif
+			PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r_A);
 			break;
-
 			/*** Absolute loads from packet header/data ***/
 		case BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS:
 			func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_word);
-- 
2.1.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
  (?)
@ 2015-02-15 18:15   ` Joe Perches
  2015-02-15 19:07       ` David Miller
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2015-02-15 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev

On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
[]
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>  	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>  	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> -	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
> +	select HAVE_BPF_JIT

trivia:

Should this be the last patch of the series?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:15   ` Joe Perches
@ 2015-02-15 19:07       ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-02-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: joe; +Cc: kda, netdev, linuxppc-dev

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800

> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> []
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> []
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>>  	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>>  	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> -	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>> +	select HAVE_BPF_JIT
> 
> trivia:
> 
> Should this be the last patch of the series?

Yes, that's the way I see it too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 19:07       ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-02-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: joe; +Cc: netdev, kda, linuxppc-dev

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800

> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> []
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> []
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>>  	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>>  	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> -	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>> +	select HAVE_BPF_JIT
> 
> trivia:
> 
> Should this be the last patch of the series?

Yes, that's the way I see it too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 19:07       ` David Miller
  (?)
@ 2015-02-15 19:16       ` Denis Kirjanov
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: joe, netdev, linuxppc-dev

On 2/15/15, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800
>
>> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> []
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> []
>>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>>>  	select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>>>  	select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>>>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>>> -	select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>>> +	select HAVE_BPF_JIT
>>
>> trivia:
>>
>> Should this be the last patch of the series?
>
> Yes, that's the way I see it too.
>

Ok, I'll resend the series if the such thing matters.

Thank you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 20:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
  2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
                     ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-15 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast

On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>
> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.

I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 20:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-15 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev

On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>
> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.

I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-15 20:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2015-02-16  7:13     ` Denis Kirjanov
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-16  7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Borkmann; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast

On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>
>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>
> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>

Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
I'll start working on it after I get this merged

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16  7:13     ` Denis Kirjanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-16  7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Borkmann; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev

On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>
>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>
> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>

Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
I'll start working on it after I get this merged

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
  2015-02-16  7:13     ` Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-16 16:01       ` Daniel Borkmann
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-16 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast

On 02/16/2015 08:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
...
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged

Cool, awesome!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 16:01       ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-16 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev

On 02/16/2015 08:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
...
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged

Cool, awesome!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2015-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov
  Cc: Daniel Borkmann, netdev, linuxppc-dev, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
	Michael Ellerman, Alexei Starovoitov

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>>
>>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>>
>> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
>> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
>> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
>> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
>> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>>
>
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged

sounds great. looking forward to it :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2015-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: Daniel Borkmann, netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, linuxppc-dev

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>>
>>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>>
>> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
>> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
>> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
>> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
>> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>>
>
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged

sounds great. looking forward to it :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-16 16:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: " Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:15   ` Joe Perches
2015-02-15 19:07     ` David Miller
2015-02-15 19:07       ` David Miller
2015-02-15 19:16       ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-15 20:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16  7:13   ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-16  7:13     ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-16 16:01     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16 16:01       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16 15:02 Alexei Starovoitov
2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.