* [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
few chnages in the code to make it work.
All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 +
arch/powerpc/net/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 47 ++++++-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S | 229 ----------------------------------
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 ++---
8 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 247 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 22b0940..5084bdc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
- select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
+ select HAVE_BPF_JIT
select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 22b0940..5084bdc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
- select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
+ select HAVE_BPF_JIT
select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
index 21be8ae..dc85dcb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#define PPC_STL stringify_in_c(std)
#define PPC_STLU stringify_in_c(stdu)
#define PPC_LCMPI stringify_in_c(cmpdi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI stringify_in_c(cmpldi)
+#define PPC_LCMP stringify_in_c(cmpd)
#define PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(.llong)
#define PPC_LONG_ALIGN stringify_in_c(.balign 8)
#define PPC_TLNEI stringify_in_c(tdnei)
@@ -52,6 +54,8 @@
#define PPC_STL stringify_in_c(stw)
#define PPC_STLU stringify_in_c(stwu)
#define PPC_LCMPI stringify_in_c(cmpwi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI stringify_in_c(cmplwi)
+#define PPC_LCMP stringify_in_c(cmpw)
#define PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(.long)
#define PPC_LONG_ALIGN stringify_in_c(.balign 4)
#define PPC_TLNEI stringify_in_c(twnei)
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
index 21be8ae..dc85dcb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-compat.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
#define PPC_STL stringify_in_c(std)
#define PPC_STLU stringify_in_c(stdu)
#define PPC_LCMPI stringify_in_c(cmpdi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI stringify_in_c(cmpldi)
+#define PPC_LCMP stringify_in_c(cmpd)
#define PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(.llong)
#define PPC_LONG_ALIGN stringify_in_c(.balign 8)
#define PPC_TLNEI stringify_in_c(tdnei)
@@ -52,6 +54,8 @@
#define PPC_STL stringify_in_c(stw)
#define PPC_STLU stringify_in_c(stwu)
#define PPC_LCMPI stringify_in_c(cmpwi)
+#define PPC_LCMPLI stringify_in_c(cmplwi)
+#define PPC_LCMP stringify_in_c(cmpw)
#define PPC_LONG stringify_in_c(.long)
#define PPC_LONG_ALIGN stringify_in_c(.balign 4)
#define PPC_TLNEI stringify_in_c(twnei)
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 03cd858..2eadde0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@
#define PPC_INST_LWZ 0x80000000
#define PPC_INST_STD 0xf8000000
#define PPC_INST_STDU 0xf8000001
+#define PPC_INST_STW 0x90000000
+#define PPC_INST_STWU 0x94000000
#define PPC_INST_MFLR 0x7c0802a6
#define PPC_INST_MTLR 0x7c0803a6
#define PPC_INST_CMPWI 0x2c000000
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 03cd858..2eadde0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@
#define PPC_INST_LWZ 0x80000000
#define PPC_INST_STD 0xf8000000
#define PPC_INST_STDU 0xf8000001
+#define PPC_INST_STW 0x90000000
+#define PPC_INST_STWU 0x94000000
#define PPC_INST_MFLR 0x7c0802a6
#define PPC_INST_MTLR 0x7c0803a6
#define PPC_INST_CMPWI 0x2c000000
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Use helpers from the asm-compat.h to wrap up assembly mnemonics
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 ++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index c406aa9..2d5e715 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -10,12 +10,25 @@
#ifndef _BPF_JIT_H
#define _BPF_JIT_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF 48
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 32
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC (48+64)
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (18*8)
#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME (48+64)
+#else
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF 24
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 16
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC (24+32)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (18*4)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
+ BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
+#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME (24+32)
+#endif
+
+#define REG_SZ (BITS_PER_LONG/8)
/*
* Generated code register usage:
@@ -57,7 +70,11 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_half);
DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte);
DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE 24
+#else
+#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE 0
+#endif
/*
* 16-bit immediate helper macros: HA() is for use with sign-extending instrs
@@ -86,7 +103,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
#define PPC_LIS(r, i) PPC_ADDIS(r, 0, i)
#define PPC_STD(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STD | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
-
+#define PPC_STDU(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STW(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STW | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STWU(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STWU | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
#define PPC_LBZ(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_LBZ | ___PPC_RT(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -98,6 +120,17 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_LHBRX(r, base, b) EMIT(PPC_INST_LHBRX | ___PPC_RT(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STDU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STW(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STWU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
/* Convenience helpers for the above with 'far' offsets: */
#define PPC_LBZ_OFFS(r, base, i) do { if ((i) < 32768) PPC_LBZ(r, base, i); \
else { PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i)); \
@@ -115,6 +148,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
else { PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i)); \
PPC_LHZ(r, r, IMM_L(i)); } } while(0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_CMPWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPDI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -196,6 +235,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
PPC_ORI(d, d, (uintptr_t)(i) & 0xffff); \
} } while (0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI64(d, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_LHBRX_OFFS(r, base, i) \
do { PPC_LI32(r, i); PPC_LHBRX(r, r, base); } while(0)
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
index 8f87d92..8ff5a3b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
*/
.globl sk_load_word
sk_load_word:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_word_neg
.globl sk_load_word_positive_offset
sk_load_word_positive_offset:
/* Are we accessing past headlen? */
subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 4
- cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_scratch1, r_addr
blt bpf_slow_path_word
/* Nope, just hitting the header. cr0 here is eq or gt! */
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ sk_load_word_positive_offset:
.globl sk_load_half
sk_load_half:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_half_neg
.globl sk_load_half_positive_offset
sk_load_half_positive_offset:
subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 2
- cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_scratch1, r_addr
blt bpf_slow_path_half
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
lhbrx r_A, r_D, r_addr
@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ sk_load_half_positive_offset:
.globl sk_load_byte
sk_load_byte:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_byte_neg
.globl sk_load_byte_positive_offset
sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
- cmpd r_HL, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_HL, r_addr
ble bpf_slow_path_byte
lbzx r_A, r_D, r_addr
blr
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
*/
.globl sk_load_byte_msh
sk_load_byte_msh:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg
.globl sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset
sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
- cmpd r_HL, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_HL, r_addr
ble bpf_slow_path_byte_msh
lbzx r_X, r_D, r_addr
rlwinm r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
*/
#define bpf_slow_path_common(SIZE) \
mflr r0; \
- std r0, 16(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */ \
- std r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
- std r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- std r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
- addi r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8); \
- stdu r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ addi r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ); \
+ PPC_STLU r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */ \
mr r4, r_addr; \
li r6, SIZE; \
@@ -115,19 +115,19 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
nop; \
/* R3 = 0 on success */ \
addi r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME; \
- ld r0, 16(r1); \
- ld r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- ld r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
mtlr r0; \
- cmpdi r3, 0; \
+ PPC_LCMPI r3, 0; \
blt bpf_error; /* cr0 = LT */ \
- ld r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
/* Great success! */
bpf_slow_path_word:
bpf_slow_path_common(4)
/* Data value is on stack, and cr0 != LT */
- lwz r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8)(r1)
+ lwz r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ)(r1)
blr
bpf_slow_path_half:
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
*/
#define sk_negative_common(SIZE) \
mflr r0; \
- std r0, 16(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */ \
- std r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
- std r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- std r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
- stdu r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STLU r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */ \
mr r4, r_addr; \
li r5, SIZE; \
@@ -167,19 +167,19 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
nop; \
/* R3 != 0 on success */ \
addi r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME; \
- ld r0, 16(r1); \
- ld r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- ld r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
mtlr r0; \
- cmpldi r3, 0; \
+ PPC_LCMPLI r3, 0; \
beq bpf_error_slow; /* cr0 = EQ */ \
mr r_addr, r3; \
- ld r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
/* Great success! */
bpf_slow_path_word_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_word_negative_offset
sk_load_word_negative_offset:
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ sk_load_word_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_half_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_half_negative_offset
sk_load_half_negative_offset:
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ sk_load_half_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_byte_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_byte_negative_offset
sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset
sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
bpf_error_slow:
/* fabricate a cr0 = lt */
li r_scratch1, -1
- cmpdi r_scratch1, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_scratch1, 0
bpf_error:
/* Entered with cr0 = lt */
li r3, 0
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d1916b5..8b29268 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler for PPC64
+/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
*
* Copyright 2011 Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, IBM Corporation
*
* Based on the x86 BPF compiler, by Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
+ * Ported to ppc32 by Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -36,11 +37,11 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
/* If we call any helpers (for loads), save LR */
EMIT(PPC_INST_MFLR | __PPC_RT(R0));
- PPC_STD(0, 1, 16);
+ PPC_BPF_STL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
/* Back up non-volatile regs. */
- PPC_STD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
- PPC_STD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
/*
@@ -49,11 +50,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
*/
for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
- PPC_STD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
}
}
- EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | __PPC_RS(R1) | __PPC_RA(R1) |
- (-BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME & 0xfffc));
+ PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
data_len));
PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r_HL, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
PPC_SUB(r_HL, r_HL, r_scratch1);
- PPC_LD_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
+ PPC_LL_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_XREG) {
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
if (ctx->seen & (SEEN_MEM | SEEN_DATAREF)) {
PPC_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
- PPC_LD(0, 1, 16);
+ PPC_BPF_LL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
PPC_MTLR(0);
- PPC_LD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
- PPC_LD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
/* Restore any saved non-vol registers */
for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
- PPC_LD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
}
}
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
ifindex) != 4);
BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct net_device,
type) != 2);
- PPC_LD_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
+ PPC_LL_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
dev));
PPC_CMPDI(r_scratch1, 0);
if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
common_load:
/* Load from [K]. */
ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
- PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+ PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
PPC_LI32(r_addr, K);
PPC_BLRL();
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
* in the helper functions.
*/
ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG;
- PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+ PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
PPC_ADDI(r_addr, r_X, IMM_L(K));
if (K >= 32768)
@@ -685,9 +685,11 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
if (image) {
bpf_flush_icache(code_base, code_base + (proglen/4));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
/* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */
((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc;
+#endif
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
fp->jited = true;
}
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Use helpers from the asm-compat.h to wrap up assembly mnemonics
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 ++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index c406aa9..2d5e715 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -10,12 +10,25 @@
#ifndef _BPF_JIT_H
#define _BPF_JIT_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF 48
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 32
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC (48+64)
#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (18*8)
#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME (48+64)
+#else
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF 24
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 16
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC (24+32)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (18*4)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS+ \
+ BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
+#define BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME (24+32)
+#endif
+
+#define REG_SZ (BITS_PER_LONG/8)
/*
* Generated code register usage:
@@ -57,7 +70,11 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_half);
DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte);
DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE 24
+#else
+#define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE 0
+#endif
/*
* 16-bit immediate helper macros: HA() is for use with sign-extending instrs
@@ -86,7 +103,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
#define PPC_LIS(r, i) PPC_ADDIS(r, 0, i)
#define PPC_STD(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STD | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
-
+#define PPC_STDU(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STW(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STW | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
+#define PPC_STWU(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_STWU | ___PPC_RS(r) | \
+ ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & 0xfffc))
#define PPC_LBZ(r, base, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_LBZ | ___PPC_RT(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -98,6 +120,17 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_LHBRX(r, base, b) EMIT(PPC_INST_LHBRX | ___PPC_RT(r) | \
___PPC_RA(base) | ___PPC_RB(b))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STD(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STDU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { PPC_STW(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { PPC_STWU(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
/* Convenience helpers for the above with 'far' offsets: */
#define PPC_LBZ_OFFS(r, base, i) do { if ((i) < 32768) PPC_LBZ(r, base, i); \
else { PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i)); \
@@ -115,6 +148,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
else { PPC_ADDIS(r, base, IMM_HA(i)); \
PPC_LHZ(r, r, IMM_L(i)); } } while(0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LD_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_CMPWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPDI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -196,6 +235,12 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
PPC_ORI(d, d, (uintptr_t)(i) & 0xffff); \
} } while (0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI64(d, i); } while(0)
+#else
+#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_LHBRX_OFFS(r, base, i) \
do { PPC_LI32(r, i); PPC_LHBRX(r, r, base); } while(0)
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
index 8f87d92..8ff5a3b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
*/
.globl sk_load_word
sk_load_word:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_word_neg
.globl sk_load_word_positive_offset
sk_load_word_positive_offset:
/* Are we accessing past headlen? */
subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 4
- cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_scratch1, r_addr
blt bpf_slow_path_word
/* Nope, just hitting the header. cr0 here is eq or gt! */
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
@@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ sk_load_word_positive_offset:
.globl sk_load_half
sk_load_half:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_half_neg
.globl sk_load_half_positive_offset
sk_load_half_positive_offset:
subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 2
- cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_scratch1, r_addr
blt bpf_slow_path_half
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
lhbrx r_A, r_D, r_addr
@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ sk_load_half_positive_offset:
.globl sk_load_byte
sk_load_byte:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_byte_neg
.globl sk_load_byte_positive_offset
sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
- cmpd r_HL, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_HL, r_addr
ble bpf_slow_path_byte
lbzx r_A, r_D, r_addr
blr
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ sk_load_byte_positive_offset:
*/
.globl sk_load_byte_msh
sk_load_byte_msh:
- cmpdi r_addr, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_addr, 0
blt bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg
.globl sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset
sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
- cmpd r_HL, r_addr
+ PPC_LCMP r_HL, r_addr
ble bpf_slow_path_byte_msh
lbzx r_X, r_D, r_addr
rlwinm r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
*/
#define bpf_slow_path_common(SIZE) \
mflr r0; \
- std r0, 16(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */ \
- std r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
- std r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- std r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
- addi r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8); \
- stdu r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ addi r5, r1, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ); \
+ PPC_STLU r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */ \
mr r4, r_addr; \
li r6, SIZE; \
@@ -115,19 +115,19 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset:
nop; \
/* R3 = 0 on success */ \
addi r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME; \
- ld r0, 16(r1); \
- ld r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- ld r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
mtlr r0; \
- cmpdi r3, 0; \
+ PPC_LCMPI r3, 0; \
blt bpf_error; /* cr0 = LT */ \
- ld r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
/* Great success! */
bpf_slow_path_word:
bpf_slow_path_common(4)
/* Data value is on stack, and cr0 != LT */
- lwz r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8)(r1)
+ lwz r_A, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*REG_SZ)(r1)
blr
bpf_slow_path_half:
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
*/
#define sk_negative_common(SIZE) \
mflr r0; \
- std r0, 16(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
/* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */ \
- std r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
- std r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- std r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
- stdu r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_STLU r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \
/* R3 = r_skb, as passed */ \
mr r4, r_addr; \
li r5, SIZE; \
@@ -167,19 +167,19 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh:
nop; \
/* R3 != 0 on success */ \
addi r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME; \
- ld r0, 16(r1); \
- ld r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \
- ld r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r0, PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*REG_SZ))(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*REG_SZ))(r1); \
mtlr r0; \
- cmpldi r3, 0; \
+ PPC_LCMPLI r3, 0; \
beq bpf_error_slow; /* cr0 = EQ */ \
mr r_addr, r3; \
- ld r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \
+ PPC_LL r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+BPF_PPC_STACK_R3_OFF)(r1); \
/* Great success! */
bpf_slow_path_word_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_word_negative_offset
sk_load_word_negative_offset:
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ sk_load_word_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_half_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_half_negative_offset
sk_load_half_negative_offset:
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ sk_load_half_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_byte_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_byte_negative_offset
sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ sk_load_byte_negative_offset:
bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg:
lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */
- cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
+ PPC_LCMP r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */
blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */
.globl sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset
sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset:
bpf_error_slow:
/* fabricate a cr0 = lt */
li r_scratch1, -1
- cmpdi r_scratch1, 0
+ PPC_LCMPI r_scratch1, 0
bpf_error:
/* Entered with cr0 = lt */
li r3, 0
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index d1916b5..8b29268 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler for PPC64
+/* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
*
* Copyright 2011 Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, IBM Corporation
*
* Based on the x86 BPF compiler, by Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
+ * Ported to ppc32 by Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -36,11 +37,11 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
/* If we call any helpers (for loads), save LR */
EMIT(PPC_INST_MFLR | __PPC_RT(R0));
- PPC_STD(0, 1, 16);
+ PPC_BPF_STL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
/* Back up non-volatile regs. */
- PPC_STD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
- PPC_STD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
/*
@@ -49,11 +50,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
*/
for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
- PPC_STD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+ PPC_BPF_STL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
}
}
- EMIT(PPC_INST_STDU | __PPC_RS(R1) | __PPC_RA(R1) |
- (-BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME & 0xfffc));
+ PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
data_len));
PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r_HL, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, len));
PPC_SUB(r_HL, r_HL, r_scratch1);
- PPC_LD_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
+ PPC_LL_OFFS(r_D, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_XREG) {
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
if (ctx->seen & (SEEN_MEM | SEEN_DATAREF)) {
PPC_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME);
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_DATAREF) {
- PPC_LD(0, 1, 16);
+ PPC_BPF_LL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF);
PPC_MTLR(0);
- PPC_LD(r_D, 1, -(8*(32-r_D)));
- PPC_LD(r_HL, 1, -(8*(32-r_HL)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(r_D, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_D)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(r_HL, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-r_HL)));
}
if (ctx->seen & SEEN_MEM) {
/* Restore any saved non-vol registers */
for (i = r_M; i < (r_M+16); i++) {
if (ctx->seen & (1 << (i-r_M)))
- PPC_LD(i, 1, -(8*(32-i)));
+ PPC_BPF_LL(i, 1, -(REG_SZ*(32-i)));
}
}
}
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
ifindex) != 4);
BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct net_device,
type) != 2);
- PPC_LD_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
+ PPC_LL_OFFS(r_scratch1, r_skb, offsetof(struct sk_buff,
dev));
PPC_CMPDI(r_scratch1, 0);
if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
common_load:
/* Load from [K]. */
ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF;
- PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+ PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
PPC_LI32(r_addr, K);
PPC_BLRL();
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
* in the helper functions.
*/
ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG;
- PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func);
+ PPC_FUNC_ADDR(r_scratch1, func);
PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1);
PPC_ADDI(r_addr, r_X, IMM_L(K));
if (K >= 32768)
@@ -685,9 +685,11 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
if (image) {
bpf_flush_icache(code_base, code_base + (proglen/4));
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
/* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */
((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc;
+#endif
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
fp->jited = true;
}
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} | 0
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} (100%)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
index 266b395..1306a58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
#
# Arch-specific network modules
#
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_64.o bpf_jit_comp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_asm.o bpf_jit_comp.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
rename to arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} | 0
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
rename arch/powerpc/net/{bpf_jit_64.S => bpf_jit_asm.S} (100%)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
index 266b395..1306a58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
#
# Arch-specific network modules
#
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_64.o bpf_jit_comp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_asm.o bpf_jit_comp.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
similarity index 100%
rename from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S
rename to arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_asm.S
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Denis Kirjanov
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +-------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 2d5e715..889fd19 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) \
+ do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct, paca_index) != 2); \
+ PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, 13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index)); \
+ } while (0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) \
+ do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct thread_info, cpu) != 4); \
+ PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, (1 & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)), \
+ offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu)); \
+ } while(0)
+#endif
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) do { PPC_LI(r, 0); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_CMPWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPDI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8b29268..17cea18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -411,20 +411,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 5);
break;
case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_CPU:
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * PACA ptr is r13:
- * raw_smp_processor_id() = local_paca->paca_index
- */
- BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct,
- paca_index) != 2);
- PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, 13,
- offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));
-#else
- PPC_LI(r_A, 0);
-#endif
+ PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r_A);
break;
-
/*** Absolute loads from packet header/data ***/
case BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS:
func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_word);
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Denis Kirjanov, linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +-------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 2d5e715..889fd19 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ DECLARE_LOAD_FUNC(sk_load_byte_msh);
#define PPC_LL_OFFS(r, base, i) do { PPC_LWZ_OFFS(r, base, i); } while(0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) \
+ do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct, paca_index) != 2); \
+ PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, 13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index)); \
+ } while (0)
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) \
+ do { BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct thread_info, cpu) != 4); \
+ PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r, (1 & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)), \
+ offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu)); \
+ } while(0)
+#endif
+#else
+#define PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r) do { PPC_LI(r, 0); } while(0)
+#endif
+
#define PPC_CMPWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPDI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPDI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
#define PPC_CMPLWI(a, i) EMIT(PPC_INST_CMPLWI | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_L(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8b29268..17cea18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -411,20 +411,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
PPC_SRWI(r_A, r_A, 5);
break;
case BPF_ANC | SKF_AD_CPU:
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * PACA ptr is r13:
- * raw_smp_processor_id() = local_paca->paca_index
- */
- BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct paca_struct,
- paca_index) != 2);
- PPC_LHZ_OFFS(r_A, 13,
- offsetof(struct paca_struct, paca_index));
-#else
- PPC_LI(r_A, 0);
-#endif
+ PPC_BPF_LOAD_CPU(r_A);
break;
-
/*** Absolute loads from packet header/data ***/
case BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS:
func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_word);
--
2.1.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
(?)
@ 2015-02-15 18:15 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2015-02-15 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev
On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
[]
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> - select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
> + select HAVE_BPF_JIT
trivia:
Should this be the last patch of the series?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 18:15 ` Joe Perches
@ 2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-02-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joe; +Cc: kda, netdev, linuxppc-dev
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800
> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> []
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> []
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> - select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>> + select HAVE_BPF_JIT
>
> trivia:
>
> Should this be the last patch of the series?
Yes, that's the way I see it too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-02-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joe; +Cc: netdev, kda, linuxppc-dev
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800
> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> []
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> []
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> - select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>> + select HAVE_BPF_JIT
>
> trivia:
>
> Should this be the last patch of the series?
Yes, that's the way I see it too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
(?)
@ 2015-02-15 19:16 ` Denis Kirjanov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-15 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: joe, netdev, linuxppc-dev
On 2/15/15, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:15:54 -0800
>
>> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 21:06 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> []
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> []
>>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ config PPC
>>> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
>>> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
>>> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>>> - select HAVE_BPF_JIT if PPC64
>>> + select HAVE_BPF_JIT
>>
>> trivia:
>>
>> Should this be the last patch of the series?
>
> Yes, that's the way I see it too.
>
Ok, I'll resend the series if the such thing matters.
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-15 20:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-15 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast
On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>
> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-15 20:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-15 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev
On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>
> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-15 20:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
@ 2015-02-16 7:13 ` Denis Kirjanov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-16 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Borkmann; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast
On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>
>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>
> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>
Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
I'll start working on it after I get this merged
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 7:13 ` Denis Kirjanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Denis Kirjanov @ 2015-02-16 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Borkmann; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev
On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>
>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>
> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>
Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
I'll start working on it after I get this merged
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
2015-02-16 7:13 ` Denis Kirjanov
@ 2015-02-16 16:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-16 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, linuxppc-dev, benh, mpe, ast
On 02/16/2015 08:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
...
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged
Cool, awesome!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 16:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2015-02-16 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: netdev, ast, linuxppc-dev
On 02/16/2015 08:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
...
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged
Cool, awesome!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2015-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov
Cc: Daniel Borkmann, netdev, linuxppc-dev, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Michael Ellerman, Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>>
>>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>>
>> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
>> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
>> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
>> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
>> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>>
>
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged
sounds great. looking forward to it :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32
@ 2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2015-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Kirjanov; +Cc: Daniel Borkmann, netdev, Alexei Starovoitov, linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> On 2/15/15, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> On 02/15/2015 07:06 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> This patch series enables BPF JIT on ppc32. There are relatevily
>>> few chnages in the code to make it work.
>>>
>>> All test_bpf tests passed both on 7447a and P2041-based machines.
>>
>> I'm just wondering, next to the feedback that has already been
>> provided, would opening this up for ppc32 make it significantly
>> more difficult in future to migrate from classic BPF JIT to eBPF
>> JIT eventually (which is what we want long-term)? Being curious,
>> is there any ongoing effort from ppc people?
>>
>
> Well, I don't see significant challenges to enable eBPF on ppc64 in the future.
> I'll start working on it after I get this merged
sounds great. looking forward to it :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-16 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-15 18:06 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] ppc: Kconfig: " Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:15 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
2015-02-15 19:07 ` David Miller
2015-02-15 19:16 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] ppc: bpf: add required compatibility macros for jit Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] ppc: bpf: add reqired opcodes for ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] ppc: bpf: update jit to use compatibility macros Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] ppc: bpf: rename bpf_jit_64.S to bpf_jit_asm.S Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] ppc: bpf: Add SKF_AD_CPU for ppc32 Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 18:06 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-15 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf: Enable BPF JIT on ppc32 Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-15 20:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16 7:13 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-16 7:13 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-02-16 16:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16 16:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-02-16 15:02 Alexei Starovoitov
2015-02-16 15:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.