All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix possible deadlock in isp1760_udc_irq
@ 2015-03-04 17:07 Sudeep Holla
  2015-03-05 10:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2015-03-04 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-usb, linux-kernel, Laurent Pinchart, Felipe Balbi
  Cc: Sudeep Holla, Greg Kroah-Hartman

Use spin_{un,}lock_irq{save,restore} in isp1760_udc_{start,stop} to
prevent following potentially deadlock scenario between
isp1760_udc_{start,stop} and isp1760_udc_irq :

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
4.0.0-rc2-00004-gf7bb2ef60173 #51 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
in:imklog/2118 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
 (&(&udc->lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<c0397a93>] isp1760_udc_irq+0x367/0x9dc
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<c05135b3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x30
  [<c0396b87>] isp1760_udc_start+0x23/0xf8
  [<c039dc21>] udc_bind_to_driver+0x71/0xb0
  [<c039de4f>] usb_gadget_probe_driver+0x53/0x9c
  [<bf80d0df>] usb_composite_probe+0x8a/0xa4 [libcomposite]
  [<bf8311a7>] 0xbf8311a7
  [<c00088c5>] do_one_initcall+0x8d/0x17c
  [<c050b92d>] do_init_module+0x49/0x148
  [<c0087323>] load_module+0xb7f/0xbc4
  [<c0087471>] SyS_finit_module+0x51/0x74
  [<c000d8c1>] ret_fast_syscall+0x1/0x68
irq event stamp: 4966
hardirqs last  enabled at (4965): [<c05137df>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x24
hardirqs last disabled at (4966): [<c00110b3>] __irq_svc+0x33/0x64
softirqs last  enabled at (4458): [<c0023475>] __do_softirq+0x23d/0x2d0
softirqs last disabled at (4389): [<c002380b>] irq_exit+0xef/0x15c

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by in:imklog/2118:
 #0:  (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c010a101>] __fdget_pos+0x31/0x34

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> 
---
 drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
index 6d618b3fab07..fbfbd59aae64 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
 			     struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
 {
 	struct isp1760_udc *udc = gadget_to_udc(gadget);
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* The hardware doesn't support low speed. */
 	if (driver->max_speed < USB_SPEED_FULL) {
@@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&udc->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);
 
 	if (udc->driver) {
 		dev_err(udc->isp->dev, "UDC already has a gadget driver\n");
@@ -1208,7 +1209,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
 
 	udc->driver = driver;
 
-	spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc->lock, flags);
 
 	dev_dbg(udc->isp->dev, "starting UDC with driver %s\n",
 		driver->function);
@@ -1232,6 +1233,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
 static int isp1760_udc_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
 {
 	struct isp1760_udc *udc = gadget_to_udc(gadget);
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	dev_dbg(udc->isp->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
@@ -1239,9 +1241,9 @@ static int isp1760_udc_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
 
 	isp1760_udc_write(udc, DC_MODE, 0);
 
-	spin_lock(&udc->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);
 	udc->driver = NULL;
-	spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix possible deadlock in isp1760_udc_irq
  2015-03-04 17:07 [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix possible deadlock in isp1760_udc_irq Sudeep Holla
@ 2015-03-05 10:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
  2015-03-05 10:52   ` Sudeep Holla
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2015-03-05 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudeep Holla; +Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, Felipe Balbi, Greg Kroah-Hartman

Hi Sudeep,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 04 March 2015 17:07:57 Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Use spin_{un,}lock_irq{save,restore} in isp1760_udc_{start,stop} to
> prevent following potentially deadlock scenario between
> isp1760_udc_{start,stop} and isp1760_udc_irq :
> 
> =================================
> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> 4.0.0-rc2-00004-gf7bb2ef60173 #51 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------
> inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
> in:imklog/2118 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
>  (&(&udc->lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<c0397a93>]
> isp1760_udc_irq+0x367/0x9dc {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
>   [<c05135b3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x30
>   [<c0396b87>] isp1760_udc_start+0x23/0xf8
>   [<c039dc21>] udc_bind_to_driver+0x71/0xb0
>   [<c039de4f>] usb_gadget_probe_driver+0x53/0x9c
>   [<bf80d0df>] usb_composite_probe+0x8a/0xa4 [libcomposite]
>   [<bf8311a7>] 0xbf8311a7
>   [<c00088c5>] do_one_initcall+0x8d/0x17c
>   [<c050b92d>] do_init_module+0x49/0x148
>   [<c0087323>] load_module+0xb7f/0xbc4
>   [<c0087471>] SyS_finit_module+0x51/0x74
>   [<c000d8c1>] ret_fast_syscall+0x1/0x68
> irq event stamp: 4966
> hardirqs last  enabled at (4965): [<c05137df>]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x24 hardirqs last disabled at (4966):
> [<c00110b3>] __irq_svc+0x33/0x64 softirqs last  enabled at (4458):
> [<c0023475>] __do_softirq+0x23d/0x2d0 softirqs last disabled at (4389):
> [<c002380b>] irq_exit+0xef/0x15c
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);
>   <Interrupt>
>     lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 1 lock held by in:imklog/2118:
>  #0:  (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c010a101>] __fdget_pos+0x31/0x34
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
> b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c index 6d618b3fab07..fbfbd59aae64 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
> @@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
> *gadget, struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
>  {
>  	struct isp1760_udc *udc = gadget_to_udc(gadget);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> 
>  	/* The hardware doesn't support low speed. */
>  	if (driver->max_speed < USB_SPEED_FULL) {
> @@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
> *gadget, return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
> -	spin_lock(&udc->lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);

Strictly speaking spin_lock_irq() should be enough given that udc_start and 
udc_stop are called with interrupts enabled, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to 
be safe. I'll let you go with your preference. For both options,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> 
>  	if (udc->driver) {
>  		dev_err(udc->isp->dev, "UDC already has a gadget driver\n");
> @@ -1208,7 +1209,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
> *gadget,
> 
>  	udc->driver = driver;
> 
> -	spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc->lock, flags);
> 
>  	dev_dbg(udc->isp->dev, "starting UDC with driver %s\n",
>  		driver->function);
> @@ -1232,6 +1233,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
> *gadget, static int isp1760_udc_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
>  {
>  	struct isp1760_udc *udc = gadget_to_udc(gadget);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> 
>  	dev_dbg(udc->isp->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
> 
> @@ -1239,9 +1241,9 @@ static int isp1760_udc_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
> 
>  	isp1760_udc_write(udc, DC_MODE, 0);
> 
> -	spin_lock(&udc->lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);
>  	udc->driver = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock(&udc->lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&udc->lock, flags);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix possible deadlock in isp1760_udc_irq
  2015-03-05 10:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2015-03-05 10:52   ` Sudeep Holla
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2015-03-05 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent Pinchart
  Cc: Sudeep Holla, linux-usb, linux-kernel, Felipe Balbi, Greg Kroah-Hartman



On 05/03/15 10:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 17:07:57 Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Use spin_{un,}lock_irq{save,restore} in isp1760_udc_{start,stop} to
>> prevent following potentially deadlock scenario between
>> isp1760_udc_{start,stop} and isp1760_udc_irq :
>>
>> =================================
>> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
>> 4.0.0-rc2-00004-gf7bb2ef60173 #51 Not tainted
>> ---------------------------------
>> inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
>> in:imklog/2118 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
>>   (&(&udc->lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<c0397a93>]
>> isp1760_udc_irq+0x367/0x9dc {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
>>    [<c05135b3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x30
>>    [<c0396b87>] isp1760_udc_start+0x23/0xf8
>>    [<c039dc21>] udc_bind_to_driver+0x71/0xb0
>>    [<c039de4f>] usb_gadget_probe_driver+0x53/0x9c
>>    [<bf80d0df>] usb_composite_probe+0x8a/0xa4 [libcomposite]
>>    [<bf8311a7>] 0xbf8311a7
>>    [<c00088c5>] do_one_initcall+0x8d/0x17c
>>    [<c050b92d>] do_init_module+0x49/0x148
>>    [<c0087323>] load_module+0xb7f/0xbc4
>>    [<c0087471>] SyS_finit_module+0x51/0x74
>>    [<c000d8c1>] ret_fast_syscall+0x1/0x68
>> irq event stamp: 4966
>> hardirqs last  enabled at (4965): [<c05137df>]
>> _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x1f/0x24 hardirqs last disabled at (4966):
>> [<c00110b3>] __irq_svc+0x33/0x64 softirqs last  enabled at (4458):
>> [<c0023475>] __do_softirq+0x23d/0x2d0 softirqs last disabled at (4389):
>> [<c002380b>] irq_exit+0xef/0x15c
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>>         CPU0
>>         ----
>>    lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);
>>    <Interrupt>
>>      lock(&(&udc->lock)->rlock);
>>
>>   *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> 1 lock held by in:imklog/2118:
>>   #0:  (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c010a101>] __fdget_pos+0x31/0x34
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c | 10 ++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c index 6d618b3fab07..fbfbd59aae64 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> @@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
>> *gadget, struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
>>   {
>>   	struct isp1760_udc *udc = gadget_to_udc(gadget);
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>
>>   	/* The hardware doesn't support low speed. */
>>   	if (driver->max_speed < USB_SPEED_FULL) {
>> @@ -1198,7 +1199,7 @@ static int isp1760_udc_start(struct usb_gadget
>> *gadget, return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	spin_lock(&udc->lock);
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);
>
> Strictly speaking spin_lock_irq() should be enough given that udc_start and
> udc_stop are called with interrupts enabled, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to
> be safe. I'll let you go with your preference. For both options,
>

I agree, even I had similar thoughts but just played safe :)

> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>

Thanks.

--
Regars,
Sudeep


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-05 10:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-04 17:07 [PATCH] usb: isp1760: fix possible deadlock in isp1760_udc_irq Sudeep Holla
2015-03-05 10:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-03-05 10:52   ` Sudeep Holla

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.