All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
	Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
	Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>, <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@samsung.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:49:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55093C12.7070004@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426518695.26437.55.camel@x220>

Hi Paul,

On 03/16/2015 04:11 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> +config PCI_ST
>> +	bool "ST PCIe controller"
> You add a bool Kconfig symbol. A week or two ago I saw some patches fly
> by that - I think - allowed PCIe controllers to be built modular.

Thanks for your review.

Are you talking about "PCI: Export symbols of PCI functions" patch, that 
is part of a series
named "pci: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc PCIe support" ?

This controller doesn't look like to be based on pcie-designware core 
driver.
Other vendors that are using "pcie-designware" core driver are also make 
it bool.
The current core driver doesn't support module loading/unloading as I 
see it.
If this is required, I also think this should be part of another patchset.

What do you think ?

Please advise,
BR,
Fabrice
>
>> +	depends on ARCH_STI || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
>> +	select PCIE_DW
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable PCIe controller support on ST Socs. This controller is based
>> +	  on Designware hardware and therefore the driver re-uses the
>> +	  Designware core functions to implement the driver.
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_ST) += pci-st.o
> If you keep that symbol bool this objectfile will never be part of a
> module.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..470000d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> For built-in code this include is, probably, not needed.
>
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_pcie_of_match);
> For built-in code that macro will always be preprocessed away.
>
>> +/* ST PCIe driver does not allow module unload */
>> +static int __init pcie_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_driver_probe(&st_pcie_driver, st_pcie_probe);
>> +}
>> +device_initcall(pcie_init);
> I think the module unload comment is a bit odd for built-in only code.
>
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCI express Driver for ST SoCs");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> These three macros will be, basically, always preprocessed away as long
> as this code can't be built to be modular.
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.c>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:49:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55093C12.7070004@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426518695.26437.55.camel@x220>

Hi Paul,

On 03/16/2015 04:11 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> +config PCI_ST
>> +	bool "ST PCIe controller"
> You add a bool Kconfig symbol. A week or two ago I saw some patches fly
> by that - I think - allowed PCIe controllers to be built modular.

Thanks for your review.

Are you talking about "PCI: Export symbols of PCI functions" patch, that 
is part of a series
named "pci: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc PCIe support" ?

This controller doesn't look like to be based on pcie-designware core 
driver.
Other vendors that are using "pcie-designware" core driver are also make 
it bool.
The current core driver doesn't support module loading/unloading as I 
see it.
If this is required, I also think this should be part of another patchset.

What do you think ?

Please advise,
BR,
Fabrice
>
>> +	depends on ARCH_STI || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
>> +	select PCIE_DW
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable PCIe controller support on ST Socs. This controller is based
>> +	  on Designware hardware and therefore the driver re-uses the
>> +	  Designware core functions to implement the driver.
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_ST) += pci-st.o
> If you keep that symbol bool this objectfile will never be part of a
> module.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..470000d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> For built-in code this include is, probably, not needed.
>
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_pcie_of_match);
> For built-in code that macro will always be preprocessed away.
>
>> +/* ST PCIe driver does not allow module unload */
>> +static int __init pcie_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_driver_probe(&st_pcie_driver, st_pcie_probe);
>> +}
>> +device_initcall(pcie_init);
> I think the module unload comment is a bit odd for built-in only code.
>
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCI express Driver for ST SoCs");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> These three macros will be, basically, always preprocessed away as long
> as this code can't be built to be modular.
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fabrice.gasnier@st.com (Fabrice Gasnier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:49:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55093C12.7070004@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426518695.26437.55.camel@x220>

Hi Paul,

On 03/16/2015 04:11 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> +config PCI_ST
>> +	bool "ST PCIe controller"
> You add a bool Kconfig symbol. A week or two ago I saw some patches fly
> by that - I think - allowed PCIe controllers to be built modular.

Thanks for your review.

Are you talking about "PCI: Export symbols of PCI functions" patch, that 
is part of a series
named "pci: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc PCIe support" ?

This controller doesn't look like to be based on pcie-designware core 
driver.
Other vendors that are using "pcie-designware" core driver are also make 
it bool.
The current core driver doesn't support module loading/unloading as I 
see it.
If this is required, I also think this should be part of another patchset.

What do you think ?

Please advise,
BR,
Fabrice
>
>> +	depends on ARCH_STI || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
>> +	select PCIE_DW
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable PCIe controller support on ST Socs. This controller is based
>> +	  on Designware hardware and therefore the driver re-uses the
>> +	  Designware core functions to implement the driver.
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_ST) += pci-st.o
> If you keep that symbol bool this objectfile will never be part of a
> module.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..470000d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> For built-in code this include is, probably, not needed.
>
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_pcie_of_match);
> For built-in code that macro will always be preprocessed away.
>
>> +/* ST PCIe driver does not allow module unload */
>> +static int __init pcie_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_driver_probe(&st_pcie_driver, st_pcie_probe);
>> +}
>> +device_initcall(pcie_init);
> I think the module unload comment is a bit odd for built-in only code.
>
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCI express Driver for ST SoCs");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> These three macros will be, basically, always preprocessed away as long
> as this code can't be built to be modular.
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 14:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: st: provide support for dw pcie Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20 ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: STi: Kconfig update for PCIe support Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: st: Add Device Tree bindings for sti pcie Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-17 11:42   ` Liviu Dudau
2015-03-17 11:42     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-03-17 11:42     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-03-17 11:42     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-03-30 12:28     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:28       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:28       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:28       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 15:11   ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-16 15:11     ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-16 15:11     ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-17  7:53     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:53       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:53       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:53       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-18  8:49     ` Fabrice Gasnier [this message]
2015-03-18  8:49       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-03-18  8:49       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-03-18 10:35       ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-18 10:35         ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-18 10:35         ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-31  9:11         ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-31  9:11           ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-31  9:11           ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-31  9:11           ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-04-09 12:43           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-09 12:43             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-09 12:43             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-09 12:43             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-17 10:35   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-03-17 10:35     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-03-17 10:35     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-03-30 12:41     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:41       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:41       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-30 12:41       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: designware: Add disable IO support Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 17:53   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-03-16 17:53     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-03-16 17:53     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-03-17  7:49     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:49       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:49       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:49       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-16 18:00   ` Kumar Gala
2015-03-16 18:00     ` Kumar Gala
2015-03-16 18:00     ` Kumar Gala
2015-03-16 20:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-16 20:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-16 20:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-17  7:41       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:41         ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:41         ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-17  7:41         ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-03-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add pci-st.c to ARCH/STI architecture Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-03-16 14:20   ` Gabriel FERNANDEZ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55093C12.7070004@st.com \
    --to=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
    --cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org \
    --cc=gabriel.fernandez@st.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sachin.kamat@samsung.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com \
    --cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.