All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT, RESEND] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:56:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <551BC0B4.8050007@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427863242.4256.10.camel@ellerman.id.au>



On 01/04/15 05:40, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 18:14 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> On 31/03/15 11:56, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-23-02 at 18:18:20 UTC, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by reusing
>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure through the
>>>> commit 246246cbde5e ("drivers: base: support cpu cache information
>>>> interface to userspace via sysfs")
>>
>>> Removing the include doesn't fix it, it needs cacheinfo_cpu_on/offline().
>>>
>>
>> I agree, had a quick look at that, and it requires some rework not sure
>> if that should be in generic code or ppc specific.
>
> Yeah OK.
>
> Also if I just remove the references from the suspend code, it still causes
> changes to the result, some of which look wrong:
>
> --- cpu0.before	2015-04-01 15:34:58.985470973 +1100
> +++ cpu0.after-no-power	2015-04-01 15:36:31.313435304 +1100
> @@ -3,22 +3,24 @@
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/level:1
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list:0-7		<- additional, OK
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/coherency_line_size:128
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/ways_of_associativity:64
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/size:32K				<- we lost the size of the Icache?
>   ./cpu0/cache/index1/type:Instruction
>   ./cpu0/cache/index1/level:1
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/number_of_sets:4			}-.
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff	  .
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/coherency_line_size:128		  .   These changes are no good
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/ways_of_associativity:64		  .
> +./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_map:ffff,ffffffff	  .
> +./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_list:0-47		}-
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/size:512K
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/type:Unified
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/level:2
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index2/shared_cpu_list:0-7		<- additional, OK
> +./cpu0/cache/index2/ways_of_associativity:0		<- this is new but wrong I think
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/size:8192K
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/type:Unified
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/level:3
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index3/shared_cpu_list:0-7
> +./cpu0/cache/index3/ways_of_associativity:0		<- ditto
>

Thanks for the log. It's been long time since I looked at this code.
It would be good to know if Anshuman had looked at this issue. If not
I will start looking at this in couple of days.

Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT, RESEND] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:56:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <551BC0B4.8050007@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427863242.4256.10.camel@ellerman.id.au>



On 01/04/15 05:40, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 18:14 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> On 31/03/15 11:56, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-23-02 at 18:18:20 UTC, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by reusing
>>>> the newly introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure through the
>>>> commit 246246cbde5e ("drivers: base: support cpu cache information
>>>> interface to userspace via sysfs")
>>
>>> Removing the include doesn't fix it, it needs cacheinfo_cpu_on/offline().
>>>
>>
>> I agree, had a quick look at that, and it requires some rework not sure
>> if that should be in generic code or ppc specific.
>
> Yeah OK.
>
> Also if I just remove the references from the suspend code, it still causes
> changes to the result, some of which look wrong:
>
> --- cpu0.before	2015-04-01 15:34:58.985470973 +1100
> +++ cpu0.after-no-power	2015-04-01 15:36:31.313435304 +1100
> @@ -3,22 +3,24 @@
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/level:1
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list:0-7		<- additional, OK
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/coherency_line_size:128
>   ./cpu0/cache/index0/ways_of_associativity:64
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/size:32K				<- we lost the size of the Icache?
>   ./cpu0/cache/index1/type:Instruction
>   ./cpu0/cache/index1/level:1
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/number_of_sets:4			}-.
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff	  .
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/coherency_line_size:128		  .   These changes are no good
> -./cpu0/cache/index1/ways_of_associativity:64		  .
> +./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_map:ffff,ffffffff	  .
> +./cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_list:0-47		}-
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/size:512K
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/type:Unified
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/level:2
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index2/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index2/shared_cpu_list:0-7		<- additional, OK
> +./cpu0/cache/index2/ways_of_associativity:0		<- this is new but wrong I think
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/size:8192K
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/type:Unified
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/level:3
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/number_of_sets:8
>   ./cpu0/cache/index3/shared_cpu_map:0000,000000ff
> +./cpu0/cache/index3/shared_cpu_list:0-7
> +./cpu0/cache/index3/ways_of_associativity:0		<- ditto
>

Thanks for the log. It's been long time since I looked at this code.
It would be good to know if Anshuman had looked at this issue. If not
I will start looking at this in couple of days.

Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-01  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-23 18:18 [PATCH RFC/RFT][RESEND] powerpc: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Sudeep Holla
2015-02-23 18:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-31 10:56 ` [RFC/RFT, RESEND] " Michael Ellerman
2015-03-31 10:56   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-03-31 17:14   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-31 17:14     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-01  4:40     ` Michael Ellerman
2015-04-01  4:40       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-04-01  9:56       ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-04-01  9:56         ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=551BC0B4.8050007@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.