All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RESEND] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.
@ 2015-03-30  2:04 Wang Nan
  2015-03-30  7:03 ` Jiri Olsa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Nan @ 2015-03-30  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jolsa, acme, namhyung; +Cc: lizefan, linux-kernel

Newest libunwind does support ARM64, and perf is able to utilize it
also. This patch enables the missing perf test dwarf unwind for arm64.

 Test result:
  # ./perf test unwind
  25: Test dwarf unwind                                      : Ok

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build                |  1 +
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h  |  3 ++
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build          |  2 +
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S    | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/tests/Build                     |  2 +-
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c            |  2 +-
 tools/perf/tests/tests.h                   |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
index 54afe4a..41bf61d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 libperf-y += util/
+libperf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += tests/
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
index 1d3f39c..4e5af27 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -5,8 +5,11 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
 
+void perf_regs_load(u64 *regs);
+
 #define PERF_REGS_MASK	((1ULL << PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX) - 1)
 #define PERF_REGS_MAX	PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX
+#define PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI	PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64
 
 #define PERF_REG_IP	PERF_REG_ARM64_PC
 #define PERF_REG_SP	PERF_REG_ARM64_SP
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b30eff9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/Build
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+libperf-y += regs_load.o
+libperf-y += dwarf-unwind.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cf04a4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/dwarf-unwind.c
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+#include <string.h>
+#include "perf_regs.h"
+#include "thread.h"
+#include "map.h"
+#include "event.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "tests/tests.h"
+
+#define STACK_SIZE 8192
+
+static int sample_ustack(struct perf_sample *sample,
+		struct thread *thread, u64 *regs)
+{
+	struct stack_dump *stack = &sample->user_stack;
+	struct map *map;
+	unsigned long sp;
+	u64 stack_size, *buf;
+
+	buf = malloc(STACK_SIZE);
+	if (!buf) {
+		pr_debug("failed to allocate sample uregs data\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	sp = (unsigned long) regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_SP];
+
+	map = map_groups__find(thread->mg, MAP__VARIABLE, (u64) sp);
+	if (!map) {
+		pr_debug("failed to get stack map\n");
+		free(buf);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	stack_size = map->end - sp;
+	stack_size = stack_size > STACK_SIZE ? STACK_SIZE : stack_size;
+
+	memcpy(buf, (void *) sp, stack_size);
+	stack->data = (char *) buf;
+	stack->size = stack_size;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int test__arch_unwind_sample(struct perf_sample *sample,
+		struct thread *thread)
+{
+	struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->user_regs;
+	u64 *buf;
+
+	buf = calloc(1, sizeof(u64) * PERF_REGS_MAX);
+	if (!buf) {
+		pr_debug("failed to allocate sample uregs data\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	perf_regs_load(buf);
+	regs->abi  = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI;
+	regs->regs = buf;
+	regs->mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+	return sample_ustack(sample, thread, buf);
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..025b46e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/regs_load.S
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+
+.text
+.type perf_regs_load,%function
+#define STR_REG(r)	str x##r, [x0, 8 * r]
+#define LDR_REG(r)	ldr x##r, [x0, 8 * r]
+#define SP	(8 * 31)
+#define PC	(8 * 32)
+ENTRY(perf_regs_load)
+	STR_REG(0)
+	STR_REG(1)
+	STR_REG(2)
+	STR_REG(3)
+	STR_REG(4)
+	STR_REG(5)
+	STR_REG(6)
+	STR_REG(7)
+	STR_REG(8)
+	STR_REG(9)
+	STR_REG(10)
+	STR_REG(11)
+	STR_REG(12)
+	STR_REG(13)
+	STR_REG(14)
+	STR_REG(15)
+	STR_REG(16)
+	STR_REG(17)
+	STR_REG(18)
+	STR_REG(19)
+	STR_REG(20)
+	STR_REG(21)
+	STR_REG(22)
+	STR_REG(23)
+	STR_REG(24)
+	STR_REG(25)
+	STR_REG(26)
+	STR_REG(27)
+	STR_REG(28)
+	STR_REG(29)
+	STR_REG(30)
+	mov x1, sp
+	str x1, [x0, #SP]
+	str x30, [x0, #PC]
+	LDR_REG(1)
+	ret
+ENDPROC(perf_regs_load)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/Build b/tools/perf/tests/Build
index 6a8801b..67f48e6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/Build
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ perf-y += kmod-path.o
 
 perf-$(CONFIG_X86) += perf-time-to-tsc.o
 
-ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 arm))
+ifeq ($(ARCH),$(filter $(ARCH),x86 arm arm64))
 perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += dwarf-unwind.o
 endif
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index 4f40981..63b0d27 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static struct test {
 		.desc = "Test parsing with no sample_id_all bit set",
 		.func = test__parse_no_sample_id_all,
 	},
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
 	{
 		.desc = "Test dwarf unwind",
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
index 52758a3..a94ea87 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int test__fdarray__filter(void);
 int test__fdarray__add(void);
 int test__kmod_path__parse(void);
 
-#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__)
+#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
 struct thread;
 struct perf_sample;
-- 
1.8.3.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.
  2015-03-30  2:04 [PATCH RESEND] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test Wang Nan
@ 2015-03-30  7:03 ` Jiri Olsa
  2015-04-21  3:02   ` Wang Nan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2015-03-30  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang Nan; +Cc: jolsa, acme, namhyung, lizefan, linux-kernel

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:04:08AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> Newest libunwind does support ARM64, and perf is able to utilize it
> also. This patch enables the missing perf test dwarf unwind for arm64.
> 
>  Test result:
>   # ./perf test unwind
>   25: Test dwarf unwind                                      : Ok
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>

cannot try, but looks ok and match closely x86 pattern ;-)

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.
  2015-03-30  7:03 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2015-04-21  3:02   ` Wang Nan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Nan @ 2015-04-21  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Olsa; +Cc: jolsa, acme, namhyung, lizefan, linux-kernel

On 2015/3/30 15:03, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:04:08AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>> Newest libunwind does support ARM64, and perf is able to utilize it
>> also. This patch enables the missing perf test dwarf unwind for arm64.
>>
>>  Test result:
>>   # ./perf test unwind
>>   25: Test dwarf unwind                                      : Ok
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> 
> cannot try, but looks ok and match closely x86 pattern ;-)
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 

Sorry, I'm unable to find this patch in git repo (both tip/master and mainline).
Is there any problem?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-21  3:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-30  2:04 [PATCH RESEND] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test Wang Nan
2015-03-30  7:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-04-21  3:02   ` Wang Nan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.