From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 18:14:40 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5549ec8837b3a6fab83e92c5206cc100ffd23d85.1641748468.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw) As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if dev->dma_mask is non-NULL. So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason. So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to be 1. Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398 Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c index 635a95927e93..4f6ee5c44f75 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -7385,9 +7385,9 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) resource_size_t flash_start, flash_len; static int cards_found; u16 aspm_disable_flag = 0; - int bars, i, err, pci_using_dac; u16 eeprom_data = 0; u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME; + int bars, i, err; s32 ret_val = 0; if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S) @@ -7401,17 +7401,11 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) if (err) return err; - pci_using_dac = 0; err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); - if (!err) { - pci_using_dac = 1; - } else { - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); - if (err) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n"); - goto err_dma; - } + if (err) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, + "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n"); + goto err_dma; } bars = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM); @@ -7547,10 +7541,8 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) netdev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT; - if (pci_using_dac) { - netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; - netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; - } + netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; + netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; /* MTU range: 68 - max_hw_frame_size */ netdev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU; -- 2.32.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 18:14:40 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5549ec8837b3a6fab83e92c5206cc100ffd23d85.1641748468.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw) As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if dev->dma_mask is non-NULL. So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason. So, if dma_set_mask_and_coherent() succeeds, 'pci_using_dac' is known to be 1. Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly. [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398 Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c index 635a95927e93..4f6ee5c44f75 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -7385,9 +7385,9 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) resource_size_t flash_start, flash_len; static int cards_found; u16 aspm_disable_flag = 0; - int bars, i, err, pci_using_dac; u16 eeprom_data = 0; u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME; + int bars, i, err; s32 ret_val = 0; if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S) @@ -7401,17 +7401,11 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) if (err) return err; - pci_using_dac = 0; err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); - if (!err) { - pci_using_dac = 1; - } else { - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); - if (err) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n"); - goto err_dma; - } + if (err) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, + "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n"); + goto err_dma; } bars = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM); @@ -7547,10 +7541,8 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) netdev->priv_flags |= IFF_UNICAST_FLT; - if (pci_using_dac) { - netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; - netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; - } + netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; + netdev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HIGHDMA; /* MTU range: 68 - max_hw_frame_size */ netdev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU; -- 2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-09 17:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-09 17:14 Christophe JAILLET [this message] 2022-01-09 17:14 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration Christophe JAILLET 2022-01-09 17:30 ` Christophe JAILLET 2022-01-09 17:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Christophe JAILLET 2022-01-13 17:50 ` G, GurucharanX 2022-01-13 17:50 ` G, GurucharanX 2022-01-13 18:33 ` G, GurucharanX 2022-01-13 18:33 ` G, GurucharanX 2022-01-09 17:29 Christophe JAILLET 2022-01-14 4:08 ` G, GurucharanX
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5549ec8837b3a6fab83e92c5206cc100ffd23d85.1641748468.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \ --to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \ --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \ --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \ --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.