All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Cc: snikam@nvidia.com, thomasz@nvidia.com, jtukkinen@nvidia.com,
	mperttunen@nvidia.com, praithatha@nvidia.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	talho@nvidia.com, yhsu@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	treding@nvidia.com, avanbrunt@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:23:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554f8de1-1638-4eb9-59ae-8e1f0d786c44@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567118827-26358-4-git-send-email-vdumpa@nvidia.com>

On 29/08/2019 23:47, Krishna Reddy wrote:
> tlb_sync hook allows nvidia smmu handle tlb sync
> across multiple SMMUs as necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c        |  8 +++++---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h        |  4 ++++
>   3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> index d93ceda..a429b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> @@ -56,11 +56,43 @@ static void nsmmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>   		writeq_relaxed(val, nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset);
>   }
>   
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +				int sync, int status, int inst)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
> +
> +	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
> +		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> +			reg = readl_relaxed(
> +			      nsmmu_page(smmu, inst, page) + status);
> +			if (!(reg & sTLBGSTATUS_GSACTIVE))
> +				return;
> +			cpu_relax();
> +		}
> +		udelay(delay);
> +	}
> +	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +			    "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +			   int sync, int status)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < to_nsmmu(smmu)->num_inst; i++)

It might make more sense to make this the innermost loop, i.e.:

	for (i = 0; i < nsmmu->num_inst; i++)
		reg &= readl_relaxed(nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page)...

since polling the instances in parallel rather than in series seems like 
it might be a bit more efficient.

> +		nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(smmu, page, sync, status, i);
> +}
> +
>   static const struct arm_smmu_impl nsmmu_impl = {
>   	.read_reg = nsmmu_read_reg,
>   	.write_reg = nsmmu_write_reg,
>   	.read_reg64 = nsmmu_read_reg64,
>   	.write_reg64 = nsmmu_write_reg64,
> +	.tlb_sync = nsmmu_tlb_sync,
>   };
>   
>   struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 46e1641..f5454e71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>    */
>   #define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
>   
> -#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> -#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
> -
>   #define MSI_IOVA_BASE			0x8000000
>   #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH			0x100000
>   
> @@ -244,6 +241,11 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>   	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
>   	u32 reg;
>   
> +	if (smmu->impl->tlb_sync) {
> +		smmu->impl->tlb_sync(smmu, page, sync, status);

What I'd hoped is that rather than needing a hook for this, you could 
just override smmu_domain->tlb_ops from .init_context to wire up the 
alternate .sync method directly. That would save this extra level of 
indirection.

Robin.

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, QCOM_DUMMY_VAL);
>   	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
>   		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> index 9645bf1..d3217f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>   /* Maximum number of context banks per SMMU */
>   #define ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS		128
>   
> +#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> +#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
>   
>   /* Shared driver definitions */
>   enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> @@ -336,6 +338,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   	int (*cfg_probe)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*reset)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*init_context)(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain);
> +	void (*tlb_sync)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page, int sync,
> +			 int status);
>   };
>   
>   static inline void __iomem *arm_smmu_page(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int n)
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Cc: talho@nvidia.com, treding@nvidia.com, mperttunen@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	praithatha@nvidia.com, thomasz@nvidia.com, snikam@nvidia.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, yhsu@nvidia.com,
	jtukkinen@nvidia.com, avanbrunt@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:23:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554f8de1-1638-4eb9-59ae-8e1f0d786c44@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567118827-26358-4-git-send-email-vdumpa@nvidia.com>

On 29/08/2019 23:47, Krishna Reddy wrote:
> tlb_sync hook allows nvidia smmu handle tlb sync
> across multiple SMMUs as necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c        |  8 +++++---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h        |  4 ++++
>   3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> index d93ceda..a429b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> @@ -56,11 +56,43 @@ static void nsmmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>   		writeq_relaxed(val, nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset);
>   }
>   
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +				int sync, int status, int inst)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
> +
> +	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
> +		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> +			reg = readl_relaxed(
> +			      nsmmu_page(smmu, inst, page) + status);
> +			if (!(reg & sTLBGSTATUS_GSACTIVE))
> +				return;
> +			cpu_relax();
> +		}
> +		udelay(delay);
> +	}
> +	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +			    "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +			   int sync, int status)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < to_nsmmu(smmu)->num_inst; i++)

It might make more sense to make this the innermost loop, i.e.:

	for (i = 0; i < nsmmu->num_inst; i++)
		reg &= readl_relaxed(nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page)...

since polling the instances in parallel rather than in series seems like 
it might be a bit more efficient.

> +		nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(smmu, page, sync, status, i);
> +}
> +
>   static const struct arm_smmu_impl nsmmu_impl = {
>   	.read_reg = nsmmu_read_reg,
>   	.write_reg = nsmmu_write_reg,
>   	.read_reg64 = nsmmu_read_reg64,
>   	.write_reg64 = nsmmu_write_reg64,
> +	.tlb_sync = nsmmu_tlb_sync,
>   };
>   
>   struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 46e1641..f5454e71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>    */
>   #define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
>   
> -#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> -#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
> -
>   #define MSI_IOVA_BASE			0x8000000
>   #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH			0x100000
>   
> @@ -244,6 +241,11 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>   	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
>   	u32 reg;
>   
> +	if (smmu->impl->tlb_sync) {
> +		smmu->impl->tlb_sync(smmu, page, sync, status);

What I'd hoped is that rather than needing a hook for this, you could 
just override smmu_domain->tlb_ops from .init_context to wire up the 
alternate .sync method directly. That would save this extra level of 
indirection.

Robin.

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, QCOM_DUMMY_VAL);
>   	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
>   		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> index 9645bf1..d3217f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>   /* Maximum number of context banks per SMMU */
>   #define ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS		128
>   
> +#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> +#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
>   
>   /* Shared driver definitions */
>   enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> @@ -336,6 +338,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   	int (*cfg_probe)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*reset)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*init_context)(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain);
> +	void (*tlb_sync)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page, int sync,
> +			 int status);
>   };
>   
>   static inline void __iomem *arm_smmu_page(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int n)
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
Cc: talho@nvidia.com, treding@nvidia.com, mperttunen@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	praithatha@nvidia.com, thomasz@nvidia.com, snikam@nvidia.com,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, yhsu@nvidia.com,
	jtukkinen@nvidia.com, avanbrunt@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:23:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554f8de1-1638-4eb9-59ae-8e1f0d786c44@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567118827-26358-4-git-send-email-vdumpa@nvidia.com>

On 29/08/2019 23:47, Krishna Reddy wrote:
> tlb_sync hook allows nvidia smmu handle tlb sync
> across multiple SMMUs as necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c        |  8 +++++---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h        |  4 ++++
>   3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> index d93ceda..a429b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> @@ -56,11 +56,43 @@ static void nsmmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>   		writeq_relaxed(val, nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset);
>   }
>   
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +				int sync, int status, int inst)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
> +
> +	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
> +		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> +			reg = readl_relaxed(
> +			      nsmmu_page(smmu, inst, page) + status);
> +			if (!(reg & sTLBGSTATUS_GSACTIVE))
> +				return;
> +			cpu_relax();
> +		}
> +		udelay(delay);
> +	}
> +	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +			    "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +			   int sync, int status)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < to_nsmmu(smmu)->num_inst; i++)

It might make more sense to make this the innermost loop, i.e.:

	for (i = 0; i < nsmmu->num_inst; i++)
		reg &= readl_relaxed(nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page)...

since polling the instances in parallel rather than in series seems like 
it might be a bit more efficient.

> +		nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(smmu, page, sync, status, i);
> +}
> +
>   static const struct arm_smmu_impl nsmmu_impl = {
>   	.read_reg = nsmmu_read_reg,
>   	.write_reg = nsmmu_write_reg,
>   	.read_reg64 = nsmmu_read_reg64,
>   	.write_reg64 = nsmmu_write_reg64,
> +	.tlb_sync = nsmmu_tlb_sync,
>   };
>   
>   struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 46e1641..f5454e71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>    */
>   #define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
>   
> -#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> -#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
> -
>   #define MSI_IOVA_BASE			0x8000000
>   #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH			0x100000
>   
> @@ -244,6 +241,11 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>   	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
>   	u32 reg;
>   
> +	if (smmu->impl->tlb_sync) {
> +		smmu->impl->tlb_sync(smmu, page, sync, status);

What I'd hoped is that rather than needing a hook for this, you could 
just override smmu_domain->tlb_ops from .init_context to wire up the 
alternate .sync method directly. That would save this extra level of 
indirection.

Robin.

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, QCOM_DUMMY_VAL);
>   	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
>   		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> index 9645bf1..d3217f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>   /* Maximum number of context banks per SMMU */
>   #define ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS		128
>   
> +#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> +#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
>   
>   /* Shared driver definitions */
>   enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> @@ -336,6 +338,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>   	int (*cfg_probe)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*reset)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>   	int (*init_context)(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain);
> +	void (*tlb_sync)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page, int sync,
> +			 int status);
>   };
>   
>   static inline void __iomem *arm_smmu_page(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int n)
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 22:47 [PATCH 0/7] Nvidia Arm SMMUv2 Implementation Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu: add Nvidia SMMUv2 implementation Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:02   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:02     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:02     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:16     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:16       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:16       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:16       ` Krishna Reddy
     [not found]       ` <BYAPR12MB2710D045303BE89A7D3FF2C1B3BD0-ZGDeBxoHBPnlX2Hc6Vgn3wdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2019-09-02 13:39         ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:39           ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:39           ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:39           ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-03  1:07           ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-03  1:07             ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-03  1:07             ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-03  1:07             ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 12:07   ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 12:07     ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia, smmu-v2 Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 12:07     ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 15:13   ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:13     ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia, smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:13     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:12     ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:12       ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia, smmu-v2 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:12       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:12       ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Krishna Reddy
2019-09-02  7:38       ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-02  7:38         ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia, smmu-v2 Thierry Reding
2019-09-02  7:38         ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-02  7:38         ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Thierry Reding
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:14   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:14     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:14     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 19:00     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:00       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:00       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:00       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:23   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-08-30 15:23     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:23     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:05     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:05       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:05       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:05       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 22:49       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 22:49         ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 22:49         ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 22:49         ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-02 13:00         ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:00           ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:00           ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-02 13:00           ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global/context fault implementation hooks Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:17   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:17     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:17     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 19:16     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:16       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:16       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 19:16       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:43   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:43     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:43     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:43     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:43       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:43       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:43       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: tegra: Add Memory controller DT node on T194 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:18   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:18     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 11:18     ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: tegra: Add DT node for T194 SMMU Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 12:09   ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 12:09     ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 12:09     ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 18:39     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:39       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:39       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:39       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:44   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:44     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 15:44     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:25     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:25       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:25       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:25       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:45       ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:45         ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:45         ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:45         ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:35         ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:35           ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:35           ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 18:35           ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: tegra: enable SMMU for SDHCI and EQOS Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47   ` Krishna Reddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554f8de1-1638-4eb9-59ae-8e1f0d786c44@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=avanbrunt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jtukkinen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=praithatha@nvidia.com \
    --cc=snikam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=talho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomasz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yhsu@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.