All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] phy: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe PHY
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:38:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555C8743.6020708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519224143.GS31666@google.com>

Hi Bjorn,

On Wednesday 20 May 2015 04:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:24:10PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> On 05/04/2015 05:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 04 May 2015 06:12 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>> Add a PCIe PHY driver used by PCIe host controller driver
>>>> on Qualcomm SoCs like Snapdragon 805.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/phy/Kconfig         |    9 ++
>>>>    drivers/phy/Makefile        |    1 +
>>>>    drivers/phy/phy-qcom-pcie.c |  291
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> Why do you need a new PHY driver for this? Why not use the existing QCOM
>>> PHY driver. I can see the registers used here in phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.h?
>>
>> I agree that on first glance there are similarities, but I'm not sure
>> does the PHYs are the same IP blocks. Or at least they are different
>> revisions which have too many differences. So trying to combine them
>> will lead to more code than now.
>>
>> Either way I will try to understand how many the differences are.
>
> Ping, where are we with this?  Should I wait for something else, or are you
> convinced there's enough difference to warrant a new PHY driver, Kishon?

I'd like to wait to see if Stanimir can use existing driver instead of creating 
a new driver.

Cheers
Kishon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] phy: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe PHY
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:38:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555C8743.6020708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519224143.GS31666@google.com>

Hi Bjorn,

On Wednesday 20 May 2015 04:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:24:10PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> On 05/04/2015 05:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 04 May 2015 06:12 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>> Add a PCIe PHY driver used by PCIe host controller driver
>>>> on Qualcomm SoCs like Snapdragon 805.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/phy/Kconfig         |    9 ++
>>>>    drivers/phy/Makefile        |    1 +
>>>>    drivers/phy/phy-qcom-pcie.c |  291
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> Why do you need a new PHY driver for this? Why not use the existing QCOM
>>> PHY driver. I can see the registers used here in phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.h?
>>
>> I agree that on first glance there are similarities, but I'm not sure
>> does the PHYs are the same IP blocks. Or at least they are different
>> revisions which have too many differences. So trying to combine them
>> will lead to more code than now.
>>
>> Either way I will try to understand how many the differences are.
>
> Ping, where are we with this?  Should I wait for something else, or are you
> convinced there's enough difference to warrant a new PHY driver, Kishon?

I'd like to wait to see if Stanimir can use existing driver instead of creating 
a new driver.

Cheers
Kishon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] phy: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe PHY
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:38:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555C8743.6020708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519224143.GS31666@google.com>

Hi Bjorn,

On Wednesday 20 May 2015 04:11 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:24:10PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> On 05/04/2015 05:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 04 May 2015 06:12 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>> Add a PCIe PHY driver used by PCIe host controller driver
>>>> on Qualcomm SoCs like Snapdragon 805.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/phy/Kconfig         |    9 ++
>>>>    drivers/phy/Makefile        |    1 +
>>>>    drivers/phy/phy-qcom-pcie.c |  291
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> Why do you need a new PHY driver for this? Why not use the existing QCOM
>>> PHY driver. I can see the registers used here in phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.h?
>>
>> I agree that on first glance there are similarities, but I'm not sure
>> does the PHYs are the same IP blocks. Or at least they are different
>> revisions which have too many differences. So trying to combine them
>> will lead to more code than now.
>>
>> Either way I will try to understand how many the differences are.
>
> Ping, where are we with this?  Should I wait for something else, or are you
> convinced there's enough difference to warrant a new PHY driver, Kishon?

I'd like to wait to see if Stanimir can use existing driver instead of creating 
a new driver.

Cheers
Kishon

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-20 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 12:42 [PATCH v2 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe and PCIe/PHY drivers Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42 ` Stanimir Varbanov
     [not found] ` <1430743338-10441-1-git-send-email-svarbanov-NEYub+7Iv8PQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-04 12:42   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] DT: phy: qcom: Add PCIe PHY devicetree bindings Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] phy: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe PHY Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 14:35   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-05-04 14:35     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-05-04 14:35     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-05-04 15:24     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 15:24       ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-19 22:41       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-19 22:41         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 13:08         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2015-05-20 13:08           ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-05-20 13:08           ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-05-20 13:23           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 13:23             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-22 16:25             ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-22 16:25               ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-22 18:06               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-22 18:06                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-04 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] DT: PCI: qcom: Document PCIe devicetree bindings Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-11-06 20:50   ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-06 20:50     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-06 20:50     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-11-09 16:56     ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-11-09 16:56       ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: qcom: Add Qualcomm APQ8084 SoC Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-04 12:42   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-22 18:22   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-22 18:22     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-22 19:26     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-22 19:26       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555C8743.6020708@ti.com \
    --to=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.