hammer/firefly backports upgrade suite

hammer/firefly backports upgrade suite

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

Hi Nathan & Abhishek,

It turns out the mistake was to use upgrade/firefly-x and upgrade/hammer-x instead of upgrade/firelfy and upgrade/hammer. When -c hammer-backports or -c firefly-backports is given to teuthology-suite, it will upgrade to this version, from older versions of the same stable branch.

I've updated:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#upgrade
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#upgrade

whith the fix and they are running (using the OpenStack cluster though, there may be issues with the firefly upgrade suite but the hammer upgrade suite must run fine, it has run at http://ceph.aevoo.fr:8081/ enough times to suggest there are no OpenStack specific issues).

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: hammer/firefly backports upgrade suite

[Nathan Cutler]

> It turns out the mistake was to use upgrade/firefly-x and upgrade/hammer-x instead of upgrade/firelfy and upgrade/hammer. When -c hammer-backports or -c firefly-backports is given to teuthology-suite, it will upgrade to this version, from older versions of the same stable branch.
>
> I've updated:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#upgrade
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#upgrade
>
> whith the fix and they are running (using the OpenStack cluster though, there may be issues with the firefly upgrade suite but the hammer upgrade suite must run fine, it has run at http://ceph.aevoo.fr:8081/ enough times to suggest there are no OpenStack specific issues).

Hi Loic:

As you predicted, the firefly upgrade suite finished with quite a few 
failures. I looked at the first one and the log said:

ERROR:teuthology.misc:. teuthology/test/integration/openrc.sh && 
openstack network show -f json unknown error ERROR: openstack No 
networks with a name or ID of 'unknown' found

Nathan

Re: hammer/firefly backports upgrade suite

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]



On 30/07/2015 09:23, Nathan Cutler wrote:
>> It turns out the mistake was to use upgrade/firefly-x and upgrade/hammer-x instead of upgrade/firelfy and upgrade/hammer. When -c hammer-backports or -c firefly-backports is given to teuthology-suite, it will upgrade to this version, from older versions of the same stable branch.
>>
>> I've updated:
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#upgrade
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#upgrade
>>
>> whith the fix and they are running (using the OpenStack cluster though, there may be issues with the firefly upgrade suite but the hammer upgrade suite must run fine, it has run at http://ceph.aevoo.fr:8081/ enough times to suggest there are no OpenStack specific issues).
> 
> Hi Loic:
> 
> As you predicted, the firefly upgrade suite finished with quite a few failures. I looked at the first one and the log said:
> 
> ERROR:teuthology.misc:. teuthology/test/integration/openrc.sh && openstack network show -f json unknown error ERROR: openstack No networks with a name or ID of 'unknown' found
> 
> Nathan

These can be ignored. I'll fix that so it does not show in the future.

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]