* [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
@ 2015-08-21 2:18 Qu Wenruo
2015-08-21 19:01 ` Stefan Behrens
2015-08-27 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2015-08-21 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, btrfs
Hi Chris,
Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your
integration-4.3 branch?
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused
parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
Based on 46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
P.S:
Schedule for rest pull:
Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more
test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.
PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve
mechanism.
The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is
already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only
freed once case.
It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet
current merge windows.
So it's will be for 4.4.
PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup
accounting/reserve mechanism.
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo (1):
btrfs: async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
initializing
Tsutomu Itoh (1):
Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check before btrfs_free_path is
called
Zhao Lei (6):
btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
btrfs: Remove noused chunk_tree and chunk_objectid from
scrub_enumerate_chunks and scrub_chunk
btrfs: Cleanup for btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance
btrfs: Remove useless condition in start_log_trans
btrfs: Remove unused arguments in tree-log.c
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76
+++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +-
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------
fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +-
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++-----------
10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
2015-08-21 2:18 [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup Qu Wenruo
@ 2015-08-21 19:01 ` Stefan Behrens
2015-08-24 2:30 ` Anand Jain
2015-08-27 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Behrens @ 2015-08-21 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo, Chris Mason, btrfs
Please send your patches to the mailing list for reviews by everybody.
On 8/21/2015 4:18 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your
> integration-4.3 branch?
>
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
>
> Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused
> parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
>
> We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
>
> Based on 46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
> And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
>
> P.S:
> Schedule for rest pull:
> Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
> The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more
> test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.
>
> PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
> This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve
> mechanism.
>
> The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is
> already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only
> freed once case.
>
> It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet
> current merge windows.
> So it's will be for 4.4.
>
> PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
> Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup
> accounting/reserve mechanism.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
> Qu Wenruo (1):
> btrfs: async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
> initializing
>
> Tsutomu Itoh (1):
> Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check before btrfs_free_path is
> called
>
> Zhao Lei (6):
> btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
> btrfs: Remove noused chunk_tree and chunk_objectid from
> scrub_enumerate_chunks and scrub_chunk
> btrfs: Cleanup for btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
> btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
> num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance
> btrfs: Remove useless condition in start_log_trans
> btrfs: Remove unused arguments in tree-log.c
>
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------
> fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++-----------
> 10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
2015-08-21 19:01 ` Stefan Behrens
@ 2015-08-24 2:30 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2015-08-24 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Behrens, Qu Wenruo, Chris Mason, btrfs
Stefan,
> Please send your patches to the mailing list for reviews by everybody.
Do you see any patch below which wasn't posted to the mailing list. ?
Thanks, Anand
>> Qu Wenruo (1):
>> btrfs: async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
>> initializing
>>
>> Tsutomu Itoh (1):
>> Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check before btrfs_free_path is
>> called
>>
>> Zhao Lei (6):
>> btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
>> btrfs: Remove noused chunk_tree and chunk_objectid from
>> scrub_enumerate_chunks and scrub_chunk
>> btrfs: Cleanup for btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
>> btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
>> num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance
>> btrfs: Remove useless condition in start_log_trans
>> btrfs: Remove unused arguments in tree-log.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
2015-08-21 2:18 [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup Qu Wenruo
2015-08-21 19:01 ` Stefan Behrens
@ 2015-08-27 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-31 18:48 ` Chris Mason
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2015-08-27 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Mason, btrfs
Hi Chris,
Any comment on the git pull?
As it's not picked yet nor any objection here.
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/08/21 10:18 +0800:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your
> integration-4.3 branch?
>
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
>
> Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused
> parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
>
> We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
>
> Based on 46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
> And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
>
> P.S:
> Schedule for rest pull:
> Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
> The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more
> test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.
>
> PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
> This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve
> mechanism.
>
> The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is
> already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only
> freed once case.
>
> It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet
> current merge windows.
> So it's will be for 4.4.
>
> PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
> Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup
> accounting/reserve mechanism.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
> Qu Wenruo (1):
> btrfs: async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
> initializing
>
> Tsutomu Itoh (1):
> Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check before btrfs_free_path is
> called
>
> Zhao Lei (6):
> btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
> btrfs: Remove noused chunk_tree and chunk_objectid from
> scrub_enumerate_chunks and scrub_chunk
> btrfs: Cleanup for btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
> btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
> num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance
> btrfs: Remove useless condition in start_log_trans
> btrfs: Remove unused arguments in tree-log.c
>
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76
> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------
> fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +-
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++-----------
> 10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
2015-08-27 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2015-08-31 18:48 ` Chris Mason
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Mason @ 2015-08-31 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: btrfs
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:11:46AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Any comment on the git pull?
> As it's not picked yet nor any objection here.
Hi Qu,
Some of these were already in integration, but I've picked the rest.
Thanks!
-chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-31 18:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-21 2:18 [GIT PULL] Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup Qu Wenruo
2015-08-21 19:01 ` Stefan Behrens
2015-08-24 2:30 ` Anand Jain
2015-08-27 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-31 18:48 ` Chris Mason
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.