RE: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pinned VMID for NESTED stage with BTM

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org]
> Sent: 22 July 2021 17:46
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; maz@kernel.org;
> alex.williamson@redhat.com; eric.auger@redhat.com;
> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>;
> linuxarm@openeuler.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
> Subject: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pinned
> VMID for NESTED stage with BTM
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:54:00AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
> > > More generally I think this pinned VMID set conflicts with that of
> > > stage-2-only domains (which is the default state until a guest attaches a
> > > PASID table). Say you have one guest using DOMAIN_NESTED without
> PASID
> > > table, just DMA to IPA using VMID 0x8000. Now another guest attaches a
> > > PASID table and obtains the same VMID from KVM. The stage-2 translation
> > > might use TLB entries from the other guest, no?  They'll both create
> > > stage-2 TLB entries with {StreamWorld=NS-EL1, VMID=0x8000}
> >
> > Now that we are trying to align the KVM VMID allocation algorithm similar
> to
> > that of the ASID allocator [1], I attempted to use that for the SMMU pinned
> > VMID allocation. But the issue you have mentioned above is still valid.
> >
> > And as a solution what I have tried now is follow what pinned ASID is doing
> > in SVA,
> >  -Use xarray for private VMIDs
> >  -Get pinned VMID from KVM for DOMAIN_NESTED with PASID table
> >  -If the new pinned VMID is in use by private, then update the private
> >   VMID(VMID update to a live STE).
> >
> > This seems to work, but still need to run more tests with this though.
> >
> > > It's tempting to allocate all VMIDs through KVM instead, but that will
> > > force a dependency on KVM to use VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU and
> might
> > > break
> > > existing users of that extension (though I'm not sure there are any).
> > > Instead we might need to restrict the SMMU VMID bitmap to match the
> > > private VMID set in KVM.
> >
> > Another solution I have in mind is, make the new KVM VMID allocator
> common
> > between SMMUv3 and KVM. This will help to avoid all the private and
> shared
> > VMID splitting, also no need for live updates to STE VMID. One possible
> drawback
> > is less number of available KVM VMIDs but with 16 bit VMID space I am not
> sure
> > how much that is a concern.
> 
> Yes I think that works too. In practice there shouldn't be many VMIDs on
> the SMMU side, the feature's only enabled when a user wants to assign
> devices with nesting translation (unlike ASIDs where each device in the
> system gets a private ASID by default).

Ok. What about implementations that supports only stage 2? Do we
need a private VMID allocator for those or can use the same common
KVM VMID allocator?

> Note that you still need to pin all VMIDs used by the SMMU, otherwise
> you'll have to update the STE after rollover.

Sure.

> The problem we have with VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU might be solved by
> the
> upcoming deprecation of VFIO_*_IOMMU [2]. We need a specific sequence
> from
> userspace:
> 1. Attach VFIO group to KVM (KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD)
> 2. Create nesting IOMMU domain and attach the group to it
>    (VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, VFIO_SET_IOMMU becomes
>     IOMMU_IOASID_ALLOC, VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOASID)
> Currently QEMU does 2 then 1, which would cause the SMMU to allocate a
> separate VMID.

Yes. I have observed this with my current implementation. I have a check
to see the private S2 config VMID belongs to the same domain s2_cfg, then
skip the live update to the STE VMID.

> If we wanted to extend VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU with
> PASID
> tables we'd need to mandate 1-2 and may break existing users. In the new
> design we can require from the start that creating a nesting IOMMU
> container through /dev/iommu *must* come with a KVM context, that way
> we're sure to reuse the existing VMID.

Ok. That helps.

Thanks,
Shameer
 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu