[PATCH 5/6] arm64: Port SWP/SWPB emulation support from arm

[arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)]

On Tuesday 26 August 2014 13:25:43 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:32:23PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:28:49 Punit Agrawal wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patch ports the alternative solution to emulate the SWP and SWPB
> > > instructions using LDXR/STXR sequences from the arm port to
> > > arm64. Additionaly, the patch also proivdes support to log the
> > > emulation statistics via debugfs.
> > 
> > I'm not sure that putting this into debugfs is a good idea in this
> > case: while in general that is considered a good place for this
> > kind of debugging information, we already have a precedent on arm32
> > for using procfs, and I see no reason to introduce an incompatible
> > interface for arm64.
> > 
> > You also add an interface for disabling the feature at runtime,
> > which we don't have on arm32, but that interface is not available
> > if debugfs is disabled or not mounted. Maybe a sysctl would be
> > more appropriate? That one could also be shared with arm32.
> 
> One advantage of using debugfs is that it provides a place to keep
> controls/statistics for any emulations that we add in the future, as opposed
> to littering them around in /proc or (worse) having a mixture of the two.

Yes, I understood that. I just had another idea: would it make sense to
use a tracepoint rather than a simple counter? That way you can actually
see who is using those instructions with ftrace.

You still wouldn't get the files in the same place as the enable switch
though. The easiest way to implement that switch btw would be a
module_param: It can be passed on the command line (using
swp_emulate.enable=0) or at runtime by writing to
/sys/module/swp_emulate/parameters/enable.

If we do both, there is no longer a need to have any debugfs file logic,
which is also a plus.

	Arnd