* Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra
@ 2015-11-05 13:02 Christian Ege
2015-11-05 17:19 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Ege @ 2015-11-05 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
Hi,
I am preparing Patches for the UDOO Neo (http://www.udoo.org/udoo-neo/)
i.mx6 SoloX based board to be integrated into meta-fsl-arm-extra. I have
some questions what is the intended work flow for this.
At the moment I have integrated the UDOO Neo board in my fork of
meta-fsl-arm-extra.
https://github.com/graugans/meta-fsl-arm-extra/tree/fido
- Is it okay to provide patches for fido at first or should new boards
be introduced to master only?
- How to deal with the various flavours of the Neo Familiy?
- BASIC with 512MB RAM, Ethernet
- EXTENDED 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors
- FULL 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors, Ethernet
Should I provided 3 machine configs?
- udooneofull
- udooneobasic
- udooneoextended
Are there any suggestions on the naming scheme? As far as I know '-' is
not an good idea as separator.
I Have patches available for the UDOO Quad as-well but no board to test
on. If there is interest I can provide them as-well.
Regards,
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra
2015-11-05 13:02 Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra Christian Ege
@ 2015-11-05 17:19 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-11-05 18:23 ` Christian Ege
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2015-11-05 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Ege; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hello Christian,
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Christian Ege <k4230r6@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am preparing Patches for the UDOO Neo (http://www.udoo.org/udoo-neo/)
> i.mx6 SoloX based board to be integrated into meta-fsl-arm-extra. I have
> some questions what is the intended work flow for this.
>
> At the moment I have integrated the UDOO Neo board in my fork of
> meta-fsl-arm-extra.
>
> https://github.com/graugans/meta-fsl-arm-extra/tree/fido
>
> - Is it okay to provide patches for fido at first or should new boards
> be introduced to master only?
master only.
> - How to deal with the various flavours of the Neo Familiy?
> - BASIC with 512MB RAM, Ethernet
> - EXTENDED 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors
> - FULL 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors, Ethernet
It depends; ideally UDOO ought to work with SPL and same image should
work fine with all the flavours. Wandboard does it, CuBox does it as
well.
...
> I Have patches available for the UDOO Quad as-well but no board to test
> on. If there is interest I can provide them as-well.
...
I prefer you to not send it than; we should have only maintained boards.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra
2015-11-05 17:19 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2015-11-05 18:23 ` Christian Ege
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Ege @ 2015-11-05 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Otavio Salvador; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hello Otavio,
On 05.11.2015 18:19, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Christian Ege <k4230r6@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am preparing Patches for the UDOO Neo (http://www.udoo.org/udoo-neo/)
>> i.mx6 SoloX based board to be integrated into meta-fsl-arm-extra. I have
>> some questions what is the intended work flow for this.
>>
>> At the moment I have integrated the UDOO Neo board in my fork of
>> meta-fsl-arm-extra.
>>
>> https://github.com/graugans/meta-fsl-arm-extra/tree/fido
>>
>> - Is it okay to provide patches for fido at first or should new boards
>> be introduced to master only?
>
> master only.
Makes sense
>
>> - How to deal with the various flavours of the Neo Familiy?
>> - BASIC with 512MB RAM, Ethernet
>> - EXTENDED 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors
>> - FULL 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors, Ethernet
>
> It depends; ideally UDOO ought to work with SPL and same image should
> work fine with all the flavours. Wandboard does it, CuBox does it as
> well.
Okay, at the moment SPL is not supported. But this is an good idea.
> ...
>> I Have patches available for the UDOO Quad as-well but no board to test
>> on. If there is interest I can provide them as-well
> ...
>
> I prefer you to not send it than; we should have only maintained boards.
This is what I've expected.
Regards,
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-05 18:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-05 13:02 Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra Christian Ege
2015-11-05 17:19 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-11-05 18:23 ` Christian Ege
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.