All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4
@ 2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Ard Biesheuvel, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Paolo,

This pull request contains a number of fixes for 4.4-rc4 (or -rc5 if
we already missed the boat).

The first part is a very nice catch from Pavel, who noticed that we
were not dealing very well (if at all) with the aliasing between two
registers.

The last patch from Ard is a fix for a fix that was merged in
-rc3. Hopefully we got it right this time.

Please pull!

       M.

The following changes since commit fbb4574ce9a37e15a9872860bf202f2be5bdf6c4:

  arm64: kvm: report original PAR_EL1 upon panic (2015-11-24 18:20:58 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git tags/kvm-arm-for-v4.4-rc4

for you to fetch changes up to 0de58f852875a0f0dcfb120bb8433e4e73c7803b:

  ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check (2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
KVM/ARM fixes for v4.4-rc4

- A series of fixes to deal with the aliasing between the sp and xzr register
- A fix for the cache flush fix that went in -rc3

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ard Biesheuvel (1):
      ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check

Pavel Fedin (4):
      arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
      arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
      arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
      arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   |  12 ++++
 arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |   5 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   |   4 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  |  20 +++---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  18 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 123 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |   8 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |   4 +-
 9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4
@ 2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Paolo,

This pull request contains a number of fixes for 4.4-rc4 (or -rc5 if
we already missed the boat).

The first part is a very nice catch from Pavel, who noticed that we
were not dealing very well (if at all) with the aliasing between two
registers.

The last patch from Ard is a fix for a fix that was merged in
-rc3. Hopefully we got it right this time.

Please pull!

       M.

The following changes since commit fbb4574ce9a37e15a9872860bf202f2be5bdf6c4:

  arm64: kvm: report original PAR_EL1 upon panic (2015-11-24 18:20:58 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git tags/kvm-arm-for-v4.4-rc4

for you to fetch changes up to 0de58f852875a0f0dcfb120bb8433e4e73c7803b:

  ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check (2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
KVM/ARM fixes for v4.4-rc4

- A series of fixes to deal with the aliasing between the sp and xzr register
- A fix for the cache flush fix that went in -rc3

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ard Biesheuvel (1):
      ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check

Pavel Fedin (4):
      arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
      arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
      arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
      arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   |  12 ++++
 arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |   5 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   |   4 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  |  20 +++---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  18 +++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |   2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 123 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |   8 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |   4 +-
 9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Pavel Fedin, Christoffer Dall, Ard Biesheuvel, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvm, kvmarm

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

On ARM64 register index of 31 corresponds to both zero register and SP.
However, all memory access instructions, use ZR as transfer register. SP
is used only as a base register in indirect memory addressing, or by
register-register arithmetics, which cannot be trapped here.

Correct emulation is achieved by introducing new register accessor
functions, which can do special handling for reg_num == 31. These new
accessors intentionally do not rely on old vcpu_reg() on ARM64, because
it is to be removed. Since the affected code is shared by both ARM
flavours, implementations of these accessors are also added to ARM32 code.

This patch fixes setting MMIO register to a random value (actually SP)
instead of zero by something like:

 *((volatile int *)reg) = 0;

compilers tend to generate "str wzr, [xx]" here

[Marc: Fixed 32bit splat]

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |  5 +++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a9c80a2..3095df0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -28,6 +28,18 @@
 unsigned long *vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
 unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
+static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					 u8 reg_num)
+{
+	return *vcpu_reg(vcpu, reg_num);
+}
+
+static inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
+				unsigned long val)
+{
+	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, reg_num) = val;
+}
+
 bool kvm_condition_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr);
 void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
index 974b1c6..3a10c9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, len, run->mmio.phys_addr,
 			       data);
 		data = vcpu_data_host_to_guest(vcpu, data, len);
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt) = data;
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 	rt = vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt;
 
 	if (is_write) {
-		data = vcpu_data_guest_to_host(vcpu, *vcpu_reg(vcpu, rt), len);
+		data = vcpu_data_guest_to_host(vcpu, vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt),
+					       len);
 
 		trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE, len, fault_ipa, data);
 		mmio_write_buf(data_buf, len, data);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 3ca894e..5a182af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -109,6 +109,19 @@ static inline unsigned long *vcpu_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num)
 	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					 u8 reg_num)
+{
+	return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
+}
+
+static inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
+				unsigned long val)
+{
+	if (reg_num != 31)
+		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num] = val;
+}
+
 /* Get vcpu SPSR for current mode */
 static inline unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-- 
2.1.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

On ARM64 register index of 31 corresponds to both zero register and SP.
However, all memory access instructions, use ZR as transfer register. SP
is used only as a base register in indirect memory addressing, or by
register-register arithmetics, which cannot be trapped here.

Correct emulation is achieved by introducing new register accessor
functions, which can do special handling for reg_num == 31. These new
accessors intentionally do not rely on old vcpu_reg() on ARM64, because
it is to be removed. Since the affected code is shared by both ARM
flavours, implementations of these accessors are also added to ARM32 code.

This patch fixes setting MMIO register to a random value (actually SP)
instead of zero by something like:

 *((volatile int *)reg) = 0;

compilers tend to generate "str wzr, [xx]" here

[Marc: Fixed 32bit splat]

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |  5 +++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index a9c80a2..3095df0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -28,6 +28,18 @@
 unsigned long *vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
 unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
+static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					 u8 reg_num)
+{
+	return *vcpu_reg(vcpu, reg_num);
+}
+
+static inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
+				unsigned long val)
+{
+	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, reg_num) = val;
+}
+
 bool kvm_condition_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr);
 void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
index 974b1c6..3a10c9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, len, run->mmio.phys_addr,
 			       data);
 		data = vcpu_data_host_to_guest(vcpu, data, len);
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt) = data;
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 	rt = vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt;
 
 	if (is_write) {
-		data = vcpu_data_guest_to_host(vcpu, *vcpu_reg(vcpu, rt), len);
+		data = vcpu_data_guest_to_host(vcpu, vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt),
+					       len);
 
 		trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE, len, fault_ipa, data);
 		mmio_write_buf(data_buf, len, data);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 3ca894e..5a182af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -109,6 +109,19 @@ static inline unsigned long *vcpu_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num)
 	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					 u8 reg_num)
+{
+	return (reg_num == 31) ? 0 : vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
+}
+
+static inline void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num,
+				unsigned long val)
+{
+	if (reg_num != 31)
+		vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num] = val;
+}
+
 /* Get vcpu SPSR for current mode */
 static inline unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Ard Biesheuvel, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

Further rework is going to introduce a dedicated storage for transfer
register value in struct sys_reg_params. Before doing this we have to
remove 'const' modifiers from it in all accessor functions and their
callers.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 87a64e8..545a72a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
  * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
  */
 static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (!p->is_write)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * sys_regs and leave it in complete control of the caches.
  */
 static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			  const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	unsigned long val;
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * for both AArch64 and AArch32 accesses.
  */
 static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u64 val;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write)
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+				   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 				   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  *   now use the debug registers.
  */
 static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * hyp.S code switches between host and guest values in future.
  */
 static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			      const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
 	u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			      const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
 	u64 val = *dbg_reg;
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bvr[rd->reg];
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline void reset_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bcr[rd->reg];
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static inline void reset_bcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_wvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_wvr[rd->reg];
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static inline void reset_wvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_wcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_wcr[rd->reg];
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 };
 
 static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			 const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  */
 
 static inline bool trap_xvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bvr[rd->reg];
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
  * Return 0 if the access has been handled, and -1 if not.
  */
 static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-		      const struct sys_reg_params *params,
+		      struct sys_reg_params *params,
 		      const struct sys_reg_desc *table,
 		      size_t num)
 {
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 }
 
 static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *params)
+			   struct sys_reg_params *params)
 {
 	size_t num;
 	const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index eaa324e..953abfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
 
 	/* Trapped access from guest, if non-NULL. */
 	bool (*access)(struct kvm_vcpu *,
-		       const struct sys_reg_params *,
+		       struct sys_reg_params *,
 		       const struct sys_reg_desc *);
 
 	/* Initialization for vcpu. */
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static inline bool ignore_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool read_zero(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			     const struct sys_reg_params *p)
+			     struct sys_reg_params *p)
 {
 	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = 0;
 	return true;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index 1e45768..ccd3e35 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #include "sys_regs.h"
 
 static bool access_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			 const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write)
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

Further rework is going to introduce a dedicated storage for transfer
register value in struct sys_reg_params. Before doing this we have to
remove 'const' modifiers from it in all accessor functions and their
callers.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |  4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 87a64e8..545a72a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
  * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
  */
 static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (!p->is_write)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * sys_regs and leave it in complete control of the caches.
  */
 static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			  const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	unsigned long val;
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * for both AArch64 and AArch32 accesses.
  */
 static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u64 val;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write)
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				   const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+				   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 				   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  *   now use the debug registers.
  */
 static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * hyp.S code switches between host and guest values in future.
  */
 static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			      const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
 	u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			      const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
 	u64 val = *dbg_reg;
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bvr[rd->reg];
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static inline void reset_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bcr[rd->reg];
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static inline void reset_bcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_wvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_wvr[rd->reg];
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static inline void reset_wvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_wcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_wcr[rd->reg];
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 };
 
 static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			 const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  */
 
 static inline bool trap_xvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			    const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	u64 *dbg_reg = &vcpu->arch.vcpu_debug_state.dbg_bvr[rd->reg];
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
  * Return 0 if the access has been handled, and -1 if not.
  */
 static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-		      const struct sys_reg_params *params,
+		      struct sys_reg_params *params,
 		      const struct sys_reg_desc *table,
 		      size_t num)
 {
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 }
 
 static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			   const struct sys_reg_params *params)
+			   struct sys_reg_params *params)
 {
 	size_t num;
 	const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index eaa324e..953abfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
 
 	/* Trapped access from guest, if non-NULL. */
 	bool (*access)(struct kvm_vcpu *,
-		       const struct sys_reg_params *,
+		       struct sys_reg_params *,
 		       const struct sys_reg_desc *);
 
 	/* Initialization for vcpu. */
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static inline bool ignore_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static inline bool read_zero(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			     const struct sys_reg_params *p)
+			     struct sys_reg_params *p)
 {
 	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = 0;
 	return true;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index 1e45768..ccd3e35 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #include "sys_regs.h"
 
 static bool access_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			 const struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write)
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Pavel Fedin, Christoffer Dall, Ard Biesheuvel, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvm, kvmarm

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

System register accesses also use zero register for Rt == 31, and
therefore using it will also result in getting SP value instead. This
patch makes them also using new accessors, introduced by the previous
patch. Since register value is no longer directly associated with storage
inside vCPU context structure, we introduce a dedicated storage for it in
struct sys_reg_params.

This refactor also gets rid of "massive hack" in kvm_handle_cp_64().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 87 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 545a72a..d2650e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -97,18 +97,16 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	unsigned long val;
 	bool was_enabled = vcpu_has_cache_enabled(vcpu);
 
 	BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
 
-	val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
 	if (!p->is_aarch32) {
-		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
+		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 	} else {
 		if (!p->is_32bit)
-			vcpu_cp15_64_high(vcpu, r->reg) = val >> 32;
-		vcpu_cp15_64_low(vcpu, r->reg) = val & 0xffffffffUL;
+			vcpu_cp15_64_high(vcpu, r->reg) = upper_32_bits(p->regval);
+		vcpu_cp15_64_low(vcpu, r->reg) = lower_32_bits(p->regval);
 	}
 
 	kvm_toggle_cache(vcpu, was_enabled);
@@ -125,13 +123,10 @@ static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	u64 val;
-
 	if (!p->is_write)
 		return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p);
 
-	val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
-	vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, val);
+	vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, p->regval);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -153,7 +148,7 @@ static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write) {
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = (1 << 3);
+		p->regval = (1 << 3);
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -167,7 +162,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	} else {
 		u32 val;
 		asm volatile("mrs %0, dbgauthstatus_el1" : "=r" (val));
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
+		p->regval = val;
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -204,13 +199,13 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
-		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+		p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
 	}
 
-	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt));
+	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -228,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
-	u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+	u64 val = p->regval;
 
 	if (p->is_32bit) {
 		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
@@ -243,12 +238,9 @@ static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
-	u64 val = *dbg_reg;
-
+	p->regval = *dbg_reg;
 	if (p->is_32bit)
-		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
-
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
+		p->regval &= 0xffffffffUL;
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -697,10 +689,10 @@ static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		u64 pfr = read_system_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
 		u32 el3 = !!cpuid_feature_extract_field(pfr, ID_AA64PFR0_EL3_SHIFT);
 
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = ((((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 28) |
-					  (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_BRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 24) |
-					  (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 20) |
-					  (6 << 16) | (el3 << 14) | (el3 << 12));
+		p->regval = ((((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 28) |
+			     (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_BRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 24) |
+			     (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 20)
+			     | (6 << 16) | (el3 << 14) | (el3 << 12));
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -710,10 +702,10 @@ static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
-		vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+		vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg);
+		p->regval = vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg);
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -740,12 +732,12 @@ static inline bool trap_xvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		u64 val = *dbg_reg;
 
 		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
-		val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) << 32;
+		val |= p->regval << 32;
 		*dbg_reg = val;
 
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = *dbg_reg >> 32;
+		p->regval = *dbg_reg >> 32;
 	}
 
 	trace_trap_reg(__func__, rd->reg, p->is_write, *dbg_reg);
@@ -1062,12 +1054,12 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 	int Rt2 = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
 
 	params.is_aarch32 = true;
 	params.is_32bit = false;
 	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
-	params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
 
 	params.Op0 = 0;
@@ -1076,15 +1068,12 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	params.CRn = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Massive hack here. Store Rt2 in the top 32bits so we only
-	 * have one register to deal with. As we use the same trap
+	 * Make a 64-bit value out of Rt and Rt2. As we use the same trap
 	 * backends between AArch32 and AArch64, we get away with it.
 	 */
 	if (params.is_write) {
-		u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
-		val &= 0xffffffff;
-		val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32;
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt) = val;
+		params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt) & 0xffffffff;
+		params.regval |= vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32;
 	}
 
 	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
@@ -1095,11 +1084,10 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
 
 out:
-	/* Do the opposite hack for the read side */
+	/* Split up the value between registers for the read side */
 	if (!params.is_write) {
-		u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
-		val >>= 32;
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) = val;
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, lower_32_bits(params.regval));
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt2, upper_32_bits(params.regval));
 	}
 
 	return 1;
@@ -1118,21 +1106,24 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt  = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 
 	params.is_aarch32 = true;
 	params.is_32bit = true;
 	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
-	params.Rt  = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
+	params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt);
 	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
 	params.CRn = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
 	params.Op0 = 0;
 	params.Op1 = (hsr >> 14) & 0x7;
 	params.Op2 = (hsr >> 17) & 0x7;
 
-	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
-		return 1;
-	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global))
+	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific) ||
+	    !emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global)) {
+		if (!params.is_write)
+			vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, params.regval);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
 	return 1;
@@ -1230,6 +1221,8 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	unsigned long esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt = (esr >> 5) & 0x1f;
+	int ret;
 
 	trace_kvm_handle_sys_reg(esr);
 
@@ -1240,10 +1233,14 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	params.CRn = (esr >> 10) & 0xf;
 	params.CRm = (esr >> 1) & 0xf;
 	params.Op2 = (esr >> 17) & 0x7;
-	params.Rt = (esr >> 5) & 0x1f;
+	params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt);
 	params.is_write = !(esr & 1);
 
-	return emulate_sys_reg(vcpu, &params);
+	ret = emulate_sys_reg(vcpu, &params);
+
+	if (!params.is_write)
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, params.regval);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /******************************************************************************
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 953abfc..dbbb01c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct sys_reg_params {
 	u8	CRn;
 	u8	CRm;
 	u8	Op2;
-	u8	Rt;
+	u64	regval;
 	bool	is_write;
 	bool	is_aarch32;
 	bool	is_32bit;	/* Only valid if is_aarch32 is true */
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline bool ignore_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static inline bool read_zero(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     struct sys_reg_params *p)
 {
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = 0;
+	p->regval = 0;
 	return true;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index ccd3e35..ed90578 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static bool access_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write)
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ACTLR_EL1);
+	p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ACTLR_EL1);
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

System register accesses also use zero register for Rt == 31, and
therefore using it will also result in getting SP value instead. This
patch makes them also using new accessors, introduced by the previous
patch. Since register value is no longer directly associated with storage
inside vCPU context structure, we introduce a dedicated storage for it in
struct sys_reg_params.

This refactor also gets rid of "massive hack" in kvm_handle_cp_64().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 87 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 545a72a..d2650e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -97,18 +97,16 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	unsigned long val;
 	bool was_enabled = vcpu_has_cache_enabled(vcpu);
 
 	BUG_ON(!p->is_write);
 
-	val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
 	if (!p->is_aarch32) {
-		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
+		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 	} else {
 		if (!p->is_32bit)
-			vcpu_cp15_64_high(vcpu, r->reg) = val >> 32;
-		vcpu_cp15_64_low(vcpu, r->reg) = val & 0xffffffffUL;
+			vcpu_cp15_64_high(vcpu, r->reg) = upper_32_bits(p->regval);
+		vcpu_cp15_64_low(vcpu, r->reg) = lower_32_bits(p->regval);
 	}
 
 	kvm_toggle_cache(vcpu, was_enabled);
@@ -125,13 +123,10 @@ static bool access_gic_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			   struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	u64 val;
-
 	if (!p->is_write)
 		return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p);
 
-	val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
-	vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, val);
+	vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(vcpu, p->regval);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -153,7 +148,7 @@ static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write) {
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = (1 << 3);
+		p->regval = (1 << 3);
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -167,7 +162,7 @@ static bool trap_dbgauthstatus_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	} else {
 		u32 val;
 		asm volatile("mrs %0, dbgauthstatus_el1" : "=r" (val));
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
+		p->regval = val;
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -204,13 +199,13 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
-		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+		vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+		p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
 	}
 
-	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt));
+	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -228,7 +223,7 @@ static inline void reg_to_dbg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
-	u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+	u64 val = p->regval;
 
 	if (p->is_32bit) {
 		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
@@ -243,12 +238,9 @@ static inline void dbg_to_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			      struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			      u64 *dbg_reg)
 {
-	u64 val = *dbg_reg;
-
+	p->regval = *dbg_reg;
 	if (p->is_32bit)
-		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
-
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = val;
+		p->regval &= 0xffffffffUL;
 }
 
 static inline bool trap_bvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -697,10 +689,10 @@ static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		u64 pfr = read_system_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
 		u32 el3 = !!cpuid_feature_extract_field(pfr, ID_AA64PFR0_EL3_SHIFT);
 
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = ((((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 28) |
-					  (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_BRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 24) |
-					  (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 20) |
-					  (6 << 16) | (el3 << 14) | (el3 << 12));
+		p->regval = ((((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 28) |
+			     (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_BRPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 24) |
+			     (((dfr >> ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT) & 0xf) << 20)
+			     | (6 << 16) | (el3 << 14) | (el3 << 12));
 		return true;
 	}
 }
@@ -710,10 +702,10 @@ static bool trap_debug32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	if (p->is_write) {
-		vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg) = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt);
+		vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg);
+		p->regval = vcpu_cp14(vcpu, r->reg);
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -740,12 +732,12 @@ static inline bool trap_xvr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		u64 val = *dbg_reg;
 
 		val &= 0xffffffffUL;
-		val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) << 32;
+		val |= p->regval << 32;
 		*dbg_reg = val;
 
 		vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
 	} else {
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = *dbg_reg >> 32;
+		p->regval = *dbg_reg >> 32;
 	}
 
 	trace_trap_reg(__func__, rd->reg, p->is_write, *dbg_reg);
@@ -1062,12 +1054,12 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 	int Rt2 = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
 
 	params.is_aarch32 = true;
 	params.is_32bit = false;
 	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
-	params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
 
 	params.Op0 = 0;
@@ -1076,15 +1068,12 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	params.CRn = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Massive hack here. Store Rt2 in the top 32bits so we only
-	 * have one register to deal with. As we use the same trap
+	 * Make a 64-bit value out of Rt and Rt2. As we use the same trap
 	 * backends between AArch32 and AArch64, we get away with it.
 	 */
 	if (params.is_write) {
-		u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
-		val &= 0xffffffff;
-		val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32;
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt) = val;
+		params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt) & 0xffffffff;
+		params.regval |= vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32;
 	}
 
 	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
@@ -1095,11 +1084,10 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
 
 out:
-	/* Do the opposite hack for the read side */
+	/* Split up the value between registers for the read side */
 	if (!params.is_write) {
-		u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
-		val >>= 32;
-		*vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) = val;
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, lower_32_bits(params.regval));
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt2, upper_32_bits(params.regval));
 	}
 
 	return 1;
@@ -1118,21 +1106,24 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt  = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
 
 	params.is_aarch32 = true;
 	params.is_32bit = true;
 	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
-	params.Rt  = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
+	params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt);
 	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
 	params.CRn = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
 	params.Op0 = 0;
 	params.Op1 = (hsr >> 14) & 0x7;
 	params.Op2 = (hsr >> 17) & 0x7;
 
-	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific))
-		return 1;
-	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global))
+	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific) ||
+	    !emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global)) {
+		if (!params.is_write)
+			vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, params.regval);
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	unhandled_cp_access(vcpu, &params);
 	return 1;
@@ -1230,6 +1221,8 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
 	struct sys_reg_params params;
 	unsigned long esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+	int Rt = (esr >> 5) & 0x1f;
+	int ret;
 
 	trace_kvm_handle_sys_reg(esr);
 
@@ -1240,10 +1233,14 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	params.CRn = (esr >> 10) & 0xf;
 	params.CRm = (esr >> 1) & 0xf;
 	params.Op2 = (esr >> 17) & 0x7;
-	params.Rt = (esr >> 5) & 0x1f;
+	params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt);
 	params.is_write = !(esr & 1);
 
-	return emulate_sys_reg(vcpu, &params);
+	ret = emulate_sys_reg(vcpu, &params);
+
+	if (!params.is_write)
+		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, params.regval);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /******************************************************************************
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 953abfc..dbbb01c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct sys_reg_params {
 	u8	CRn;
 	u8	CRm;
 	u8	Op2;
-	u8	Rt;
+	u64	regval;
 	bool	is_write;
 	bool	is_aarch32;
 	bool	is_32bit;	/* Only valid if is_aarch32 is true */
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline bool ignore_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static inline bool read_zero(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     struct sys_reg_params *p)
 {
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = 0;
+	p->regval = 0;
 	return true;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
index ccd3e35..ed90578 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static bool access_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write)
 		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt) = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ACTLR_EL1);
+	p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ACTLR_EL1);
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Ard Biesheuvel, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

Using oldstyle vcpu_reg() accessor is proven to be inappropriate and
unsafe on ARM64. This patch converts the rest of use cases to new
accessors and completely removes vcpu_reg() on ARM64.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  | 20 ++++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 11 +++--------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
index 0b55696..a9b3b90 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 	unsigned long context_id;
 	phys_addr_t target_pc;
 
-	cpu_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
+	cpu_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
 	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(source_vcpu))
 		cpu_id &= ~((u32) 0);
 
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 			return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
 	}
 
-	target_pc = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
-	context_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 3);
+	target_pc = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
+	context_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 3);
 
 	kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
 
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 	 * NOTE: We always update r0 (or x0) because for PSCI v0.1
 	 * the general puspose registers are undefined upon CPU_ON.
 	 */
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = context_id;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, context_id);
 	vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
 	smp_mb();		/* Make sure the above is visible */
 
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_affinity_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
 
-	target_affinity = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 1);
-	lowest_affinity_level = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 2);
+	target_affinity = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1);
+	lowest_affinity_level = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 2);
 
 	/* Determine target affinity mask */
 	target_affinity_mask = psci_affinity_mask(lowest_affinity_level);
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int ret = 1;
-	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+	unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
 
 	switch (psci_fn) {
@@ -273,13 +273,13 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+	unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
 
 	switch (psci_fn) {
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
 	return 1;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 5a182af..25a4021 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -100,15 +100,10 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * vcpu_reg should always be passed a register number coming from a
- * read of ESR_EL2. Otherwise, it may give the wrong result on AArch32
- * with banked registers.
+ * vcpu_get_reg and vcpu_set_reg should always be passed a register number
+ * coming from a read of ESR_EL2. Otherwise, it may give the wrong result on
+ * AArch32 with banked registers.
  */
-static inline unsigned long *vcpu_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num)
-{
-	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
-}
-
 static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 u8 reg_num)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 68a0759..15f0477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	trace_kvm_hvc_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0),
+	trace_kvm_hvc_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0),
 			    kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
 
 	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>

Using oldstyle vcpu_reg() accessor is proven to be inappropriate and
unsafe on ARM64. This patch converts the rest of use cases to new
accessors and completely removes vcpu_reg() on ARM64.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  | 20 ++++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 11 +++--------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
index 0b55696..a9b3b90 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 	unsigned long context_id;
 	phys_addr_t target_pc;
 
-	cpu_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
+	cpu_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 1) & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
 	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(source_vcpu))
 		cpu_id &= ~((u32) 0);
 
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 			return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
 	}
 
-	target_pc = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
-	context_id = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 3);
+	target_pc = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
+	context_id = vcpu_get_reg(source_vcpu, 3);
 
 	kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
 
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
 	 * NOTE: We always update r0 (or x0) because for PSCI v0.1
 	 * the general puspose registers are undefined upon CPU_ON.
 	 */
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = context_id;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, context_id);
 	vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
 	smp_mb();		/* Make sure the above is visible */
 
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_affinity_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
 
-	target_affinity = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 1);
-	lowest_affinity_level = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 2);
+	target_affinity = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 1);
+	lowest_affinity_level = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 2);
 
 	/* Determine target affinity mask */
 	target_affinity_mask = psci_affinity_mask(lowest_affinity_level);
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int ret = 1;
-	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+	unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
 
 	switch (psci_fn) {
@@ -273,13 +273,13 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	unsigned long psci_fn = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
+	unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
 	unsigned long val;
 
 	switch (psci_fn) {
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	*vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = val;
+	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, val);
 	return 1;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 5a182af..25a4021 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -100,15 +100,10 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * vcpu_reg should always be passed a register number coming from a
- * read of ESR_EL2. Otherwise, it may give the wrong result on AArch32
- * with banked registers.
+ * vcpu_get_reg and vcpu_set_reg should always be passed a register number
+ * coming from a read of ESR_EL2. Otherwise, it may give the wrong result on
+ * AArch32 with banked registers.
  */
-static inline unsigned long *vcpu_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num)
-{
-	return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.regs[reg_num];
-}
-
 static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 u8 reg_num)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 68a0759..15f0477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	trace_kvm_hvc_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0),
+	trace_kvm_hvc_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0),
 			    kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
 
 	ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, Pavel Fedin, Christoffer Dall, linux-arm-kernel,
	kvm, kvmarm

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Commit e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's
uncachedness") modified the logic to test whether a HYP or stage-2
mapping needs flushing, from [incorrectly] interpreting the page table
attributes to [incorrectly] checking whether the PFN that backs the
mapping is covered by host system RAM. The PFN number is part of the
output of the translation, not the input, so we have to use pte_pfn()
on the contents of the PTE, not __phys_to_pfn() on the HYP virtual
address or stage-2 intermediate physical address.

Fixes: e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index 7dace90..61d96a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static void unmap_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
 			kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kvm, addr);
 
 			/* No need to invalidate the cache for device mappings */
-			if (!kvm_is_device_pfn(__phys_to_pfn(addr)))
+			if (!kvm_is_device_pfn(pte_pfn(old_pte)))
 				kvm_flush_dcache_pte(old_pte);
 
 			put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void stage2_flush_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
 
 	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
 	do {
-		if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(__phys_to_pfn(addr)))
+		if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(pte_pfn(*pte)))
 			kvm_flush_dcache_pte(*pte);
 	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 }
-- 
2.1.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check
@ 2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-04 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Commit e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's
uncachedness") modified the logic to test whether a HYP or stage-2
mapping needs flushing, from [incorrectly] interpreting the page table
attributes to [incorrectly] checking whether the PFN that backs the
mapping is covered by host system RAM. The PFN number is part of the
output of the translation, not the input, so we have to use pte_pfn()
on the contents of the PTE, not __phys_to_pfn() on the HYP virtual
address or stage-2 intermediate physical address.

Fixes: e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness")
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index 7dace90..61d96a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static void unmap_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
 			kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kvm, addr);
 
 			/* No need to invalidate the cache for device mappings */
-			if (!kvm_is_device_pfn(__phys_to_pfn(addr)))
+			if (!kvm_is_device_pfn(pte_pfn(old_pte)))
 				kvm_flush_dcache_pte(old_pte);
 
 			put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void stage2_flush_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
 
 	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
 	do {
-		if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(__phys_to_pfn(addr)))
+		if (!pte_none(*pte) && !kvm_is_device_pfn(pte_pfn(*pte)))
 			kvm_flush_dcache_pte(*pte);
 	} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
 }
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4
  2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-12-04 17:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2015-12-04 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: kvm, Ard Biesheuvel, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel



On 04/12/2015 18:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> This pull request contains a number of fixes for 4.4-rc4 (or -rc5 if
> we already missed the boat).
> 
> The first part is a very nice catch from Pavel, who noticed that we
> were not dealing very well (if at all) with the aliasing between two
> registers.
> 
> The last patch from Ard is a fix for a fix that was merged in
> -rc3. Hopefully we got it right this time.
> 
> Please pull!
> 
>        M.
> 
> The following changes since commit fbb4574ce9a37e15a9872860bf202f2be5bdf6c4:
> 
>   arm64: kvm: report original PAR_EL1 upon panic (2015-11-24 18:20:58 +0100)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git tags/kvm-arm-for-v4.4-rc4
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 0de58f852875a0f0dcfb120bb8433e4e73c7803b:
> 
>   ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check (2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0000)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> KVM/ARM fixes for v4.4-rc4
> 
> - A series of fixes to deal with the aliasing between the sp and xzr register
> - A fix for the cache flush fix that went in -rc3
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ard Biesheuvel (1):
>       ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check
> 
> Pavel Fedin (4):
>       arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
>       arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
>       arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
>       arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   |  12 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |   5 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   |   4 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  |  20 +++---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  18 +++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 123 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |   8 +--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |   4 +-
>  9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 

Pulled, thanks.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4
@ 2015-12-04 17:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2015-12-04 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel



On 04/12/2015 18:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> This pull request contains a number of fixes for 4.4-rc4 (or -rc5 if
> we already missed the boat).
> 
> The first part is a very nice catch from Pavel, who noticed that we
> were not dealing very well (if at all) with the aliasing between two
> registers.
> 
> The last patch from Ard is a fix for a fix that was merged in
> -rc3. Hopefully we got it right this time.
> 
> Please pull!
> 
>        M.
> 
> The following changes since commit fbb4574ce9a37e15a9872860bf202f2be5bdf6c4:
> 
>   arm64: kvm: report original PAR_EL1 upon panic (2015-11-24 18:20:58 +0100)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git tags/kvm-arm-for-v4.4-rc4
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 0de58f852875a0f0dcfb120bb8433e4e73c7803b:
> 
>   ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check (2015-12-04 16:30:17 +0000)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> KVM/ARM fixes for v4.4-rc4
> 
> - A series of fixes to deal with the aliasing between the sp and xzr register
> - A fix for the cache flush fix that went in -rc3
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ard Biesheuvel (1):
>       ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check
> 
> Pavel Fedin (4):
>       arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO
>       arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params
>       arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses
>       arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg()
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   |  12 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c                  |   5 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c                   |   4 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/psci.c                  |  20 +++---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  18 +++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c         |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c            | 123 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h            |   8 +--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs_generic_v8.c |   4 +-
>  9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 

Pulled, thanks.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-04 17:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-04 17:17 [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4 Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register during MMIO Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: KVM: Remove const from struct sys_reg_params Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: KVM: Correctly handle zero register in system register accesses Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: KVM: Get rid of old vcpu_reg() Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM/arm64: KVM: correct PTE uncachedness check Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-04 17:39 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/ARM fixes for 4.4-rc4 Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-04 17:39   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.