All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
@ 2016-12-19 16:04 Radim Krčmář
  2016-12-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-12-22 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Radim Krčmář @ 2016-12-19 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, David Hildenbrand

Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
test it.

Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
 The bounded wait loop is bad ... time to introduce TSC magic?
---
 x86/apic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
index 39c7fd19913d..b25ba45e4b8f 100644
--- a/x86/apic.c
+++ b/x86/apic.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include "desc.h"
 #include "isr.h"
 #include "msr.h"
+#include "atomic.h"
 
 static void test_lapic_existence(void)
 {
@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ static void test_lapic_existence(void)
 }
 
 #define TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER_VECTOR 0xef
+#define BROADCAST_VECTOR 0xcf
 
 static int tdt_count;
 
@@ -411,6 +413,49 @@ static void test_apic_timer_one_shot(void)
            (tsc2 - tsc1 >= interval));
 }
 
+static atomic_t broadcast_counter;
+
+static void broadcast_handler(isr_regs_t *regs)
+{
+	atomic_inc(&broadcast_counter);
+	eoi();
+}
+
+static bool broadcast_received(unsigned ncpus)
+{
+	unsigned counter;
+
+	for (int i = 123456789; i; i--) {
+		counter = atomic_read(&broadcast_counter);
+		if (counter >= ncpus)
+			break;
+		pause();
+	}
+
+	atomic_set(&broadcast_counter, 0);
+
+	return counter == ncpus;
+}
+
+static void test_physical_broadcast(void)
+{
+	unsigned ncpus = cpu_count();
+	unsigned long cr3 = read_cr3();
+	u32 broadcast_address = enable_x2apic() ? 0xffffffff : 0xff;
+
+	handle_irq(BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_handler);
+	for (int c = 1; c < ncpus; c++)
+		on_cpu(c, update_cr3, (void *)cr3);
+
+	apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
+			BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_address);
+	report("APIC physical broadcast address", broadcast_received(ncpus));
+
+	apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
+			BROADCAST_VECTOR | APIC_DEST_ALLINC, 0);
+	report("APIC physical broadcast shorthand", broadcast_received(ncpus));
+}
+
 int main()
 {
     setup_vm();
@@ -425,6 +470,7 @@ int main()
     test_apicbase();
 
     test_self_ipi();
+    test_physical_broadcast();
 
     test_sti_nmi();
     test_multiple_nmi();
-- 
2.11.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
  2016-12-19 16:04 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test Radim Krčmář
@ 2016-12-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-12-22 18:23   ` Radim Krčmář
  2016-12-22 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-12-22 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Radim Krčmář, kvm; +Cc: David Hildenbrand



On 19/12/2016 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
> test it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  The bounded wait loop is bad ... time to introduce TSC magic?

Yeah, the VMX tests already use the TSC (though in the other direction:
they check that _at least_ some time passed).  Roughly speaking, 1
billion TSC units should be plenty, even on a loaded hosts.

Paolo

>  x86/apic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
> index 39c7fd19913d..b25ba45e4b8f 100644
> --- a/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/x86/apic.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include "desc.h"
>  #include "isr.h"
>  #include "msr.h"
> +#include "atomic.h"
>  
>  static void test_lapic_existence(void)
>  {
> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ static void test_lapic_existence(void)
>  }
>  
>  #define TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER_VECTOR 0xef
> +#define BROADCAST_VECTOR 0xcf
>  
>  static int tdt_count;
>  
> @@ -411,6 +413,49 @@ static void test_apic_timer_one_shot(void)
>             (tsc2 - tsc1 >= interval));
>  }
>  
> +static atomic_t broadcast_counter;
> +
> +static void broadcast_handler(isr_regs_t *regs)
> +{
> +	atomic_inc(&broadcast_counter);
> +	eoi();
> +}
> +
> +static bool broadcast_received(unsigned ncpus)
> +{
> +	unsigned counter;
> +
> +	for (int i = 123456789; i; i--) {
> +		counter = atomic_read(&broadcast_counter);
> +		if (counter >= ncpus)
> +			break;
> +		pause();
> +	}
> +
> +	atomic_set(&broadcast_counter, 0);
> +
> +	return counter == ncpus;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_physical_broadcast(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned ncpus = cpu_count();
> +	unsigned long cr3 = read_cr3();
> +	u32 broadcast_address = enable_x2apic() ? 0xffffffff : 0xff;
> +
> +	handle_irq(BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_handler);
> +	for (int c = 1; c < ncpus; c++)
> +		on_cpu(c, update_cr3, (void *)cr3);
> +
> +	apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
> +			BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_address);
> +	report("APIC physical broadcast address", broadcast_received(ncpus));
> +
> +	apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
> +			BROADCAST_VECTOR | APIC_DEST_ALLINC, 0);
> +	report("APIC physical broadcast shorthand", broadcast_received(ncpus));
> +}
> +
>  int main()
>  {
>      setup_vm();
> @@ -425,6 +470,7 @@ int main()
>      test_apicbase();
>  
>      test_self_ipi();
> +    test_physical_broadcast();
>  
>      test_sti_nmi();
>      test_multiple_nmi();
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
  2016-12-19 16:04 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test Radim Krčmář
  2016-12-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-12-22 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2016-12-22 18:15   ` Radim Krčmář
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-12-22 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Radim Krčmář, kvm; +Cc: David Hildenbrand



On 19/12/2016 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
> test it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  The bounded wait loop is bad ... time to introduce TSC magic?
> ---
>  x86/apic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
> index 39c7fd19913d..b25ba45e4b8f 100644
> --- a/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/x86/apic.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include "desc.h"
>  #include "isr.h"
>  #include "msr.h"
> +#include "atomic.h"
>  
>  static void test_lapic_existence(void)
>  {
> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ static void test_lapic_existence(void)
>  }
>  
>  #define TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER_VECTOR 0xef
> +#define BROADCAST_VECTOR 0xcf
>  
>  static int tdt_count;
>  
> @@ -411,6 +413,49 @@ static void test_apic_timer_one_shot(void)
>             (tsc2 - tsc1 >= interval));
>  }
>  
> +static atomic_t broadcast_counter;
> +
> +static void broadcast_handler(isr_regs_t *regs)
> +{
> +	atomic_inc(&broadcast_counter);
> +	eoi();
> +}
> +
> +static bool broadcast_received(unsigned ncpus)
> +{
> +	unsigned counter;
> +
> +	for (int i = 123456789; i; i--) {
> +		counter = atomic_read(&broadcast_counter);
> +		if (counter >= ncpus)
> +			break;
> +		pause();
> +	}
> +
> +	atomic_set(&broadcast_counter, 0);
> +
> +	return counter == ncpus;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_physical_broadcast(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned ncpus = cpu_count();
> +	unsigned long cr3 = read_cr3();
> +	u32 broadcast_address = enable_x2apic() ? 0xffffffff : 0xff;
> +
> +	handle_irq(BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_handler);
> +	for (int c = 1; c < ncpus; c++)
> +		on_cpu(c, update_cr3, (void *)cr3);
> +
> +	apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
> +			BROADCAST_VECTOR, broadcast_address);
> +	report("APIC physical broadcast address", broadcast_received(ncpus));

This test is broken by

    commit f11e8b051ef613670f9db77a79726534dbc667ec
    Author: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
    Date:   Tue Dec 13 17:30:00 2016 +0100

    KVM: x86: make interrupt delivery fast and slow path behave the same
    
    Slow path tried to prevent IPIs from x2APIC VCPUs from being delivered
    to xAPIC VCPUs and vice-versa.  Make slow path behave like fast path,
    which never distinguished that.
    
    Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
    Fixes: 682f732ecf73 ("KVM: x86: bump MAX_VCPUS to 288")
    Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

when run with "./x86/run x86/apic.flat -smp 2 -cpu Nehalem,-x2apic", so I'm removing
that series from kvm/queue.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
  2016-12-22 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-12-22 18:15   ` Radim Krčmář
  2016-12-22 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Radim Krčmář @ 2016-12-22 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, David Hildenbrand

2016-12-22 11:45+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 19/12/2016 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
>> test it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> This test is broken by
> 
>     commit f11e8b051ef613670f9db77a79726534dbc667ec
>     Author: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>     Date:   Tue Dec 13 17:30:00 2016 +0100
> 
>     KVM: x86: make interrupt delivery fast and slow path behave the same
>     
>     Slow path tried to prevent IPIs from x2APIC VCPUs from being delivered
>     to xAPIC VCPUs and vice-versa.  Make slow path behave like fast path,
>     which never distinguished that.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>     Fixes: 682f732ecf73 ("KVM: x86: bump MAX_VCPUS to 288")
>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> when run with "./x86/run x86/apic.flat -smp 2 -cpu Nehalem,-x2apic", so I'm removing
> that series from kvm/queue.

Yes, kvm/queue had v2 of the series and I have added the test because
David noticed the broadcast bug while reviewing v3 of that series.
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg142614.html)

The bug was fixed in v4.  I have only posted v4 of this one patch as the
rest seemed ok in v3.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
  2016-12-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-12-22 18:23   ` Radim Krčmář
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Radim Krčmář @ 2016-12-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, David Hildenbrand

2016-12-22 11:02+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 19/12/2016 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
>> test it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  The bounded wait loop is bad ... time to introduce TSC magic?
> 
> Yeah, the VMX tests already use the TSC (though in the other direction:
> they check that _at least_ some time passed).  Roughly speaking, 1
> billion TSC units should be plenty, even on a loaded hosts.

I will convert it, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test
  2016-12-22 18:15   ` Radim Krčmář
@ 2016-12-22 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-12-22 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Radim Krčmář; +Cc: kvm, David Hildenbrand



On 22/12/2016 19:15, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-12-22 11:45+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 19/12/2016 17:04, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> Broadcast to address 0xff is not exercised by seabios+linux so we better
>>> test it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> This test is broken by
>>
>>     commit f11e8b051ef613670f9db77a79726534dbc667ec
>>     Author: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>>     Date:   Tue Dec 13 17:30:00 2016 +0100
>>
>>     KVM: x86: make interrupt delivery fast and slow path behave the same
>>     
>>     Slow path tried to prevent IPIs from x2APIC VCPUs from being delivered
>>     to xAPIC VCPUs and vice-versa.  Make slow path behave like fast path,
>>     which never distinguished that.
>>     
>>     Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>>     Fixes: 682f732ecf73 ("KVM: x86: bump MAX_VCPUS to 288")
>>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>
>> when run with "./x86/run x86/apic.flat -smp 2 -cpu Nehalem,-x2apic", so I'm removing
>> that series from kvm/queue.
> 
> Yes, kvm/queue had v2 of the series and I have added the test because
> David noticed the broadcast bug while reviewing v3 of that series.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg142614.html)
> 
> The bug was fixed in v4.  I have only posted v4 of this one patch as the
> rest seemed ok in v3.

Oh, okay, then I'll recheck and fix it.

Currently I'm seeing WinXP/2003 failures with apicv=0 and Win2008r2
failures with apicv=0 ept=0.  I guess I'll have to have some fun bisecting.

Paolo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-22 18:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-19 16:04 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: apic: add physical broadcast test Radim Krčmář
2016-12-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-22 18:23   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-22 10:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-22 18:15   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-22 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.