All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-4.4 bisected: kwin5 stuck on kde5 loading screen with radeon
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A3C53E.9010908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A27508.4050701@gmail.com>

On 01/22/2016 07:29 PM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>
>
> On 01/22/2016 04:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:06:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Trimming KDE folks from Cc ]
>>>
>>> On 21.01.2016 19:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:36:46PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>>> On 21.01.2016 16:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please point me at the vblank on/off jump bug please?
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIR I originally reported it in response to
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-August/087841.html
>>>>>
>>>>> , but I can't find that in the archives, so maybe that was just on
>>>>> IRC.
>>>>> See
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-January/099122.html
>>>>>
>>>>> . Basically, I ran into the bug fixed by your patch because the
>>>>> counter
>>>>> jumped forward on every DPMS off, so it hit the 32-bit boundary after
>>>>> just a few days.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so just uncovered the overflow bug.
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by "just", but to be clear: The drm_vblank_on/off
>>> counter jumping bug (similar to the bug this thread is about), which
>>> exposed the overflow bug, is still alive and kicking in 4.5. It seems
>>> to happen when turning off the CRTC:
>>>
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=218104694, diff=0, hw=916 hw_last=916
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] crtc 0: dist from vblank start 3
>>> [drm:drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos] crtc 0 : v 0x7
>>> p(2199,-45)@ 7304.307354 -> 7304.308006 [e 0 us, 0 rep]
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] crtc 0: dist from vblank start 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=218104694, diff=16776301, hw=1 hw_last=916
>>
>> Not sure what bug we're talking about here, but here the hw counter
>> clearly jumps backwards.
>>
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 1:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 2:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 3:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 1
>>> [drm:drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos] crtc 0 : v 0x1 p(0,0)@
>>> 7304.317140 -> 7304.317140 [e 0 us, 0 rep]
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 1
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=234880995, diff=16777215, hw=0 hw_last=1
>>
>> Same here.
>>
>> These things just don't happen on i915 because drm_vblank_off() and
>> drm_vblank_on() are always called around the times when the hw counter
>> might get reset. Or at least that's how it should be.
>>
>
> Fwiw, testing the HD-57570 single display with my patch that uses
> drm_vblank_off/on() in the DPMS OFF/ON path of radeon-kms does show
> hardware counter reset to zero as expected, but no jumps of software
> vblank counter. So with that vblank_off/on placement it seems to work
> nicely here.
>
> -mario
>

I spoke too early. The jump doesn't happen when i change video modes - 
video resolution / refresh rate etc, despite hw counter reset. But if i 
just disable and then reenable a display, the software counter jumps.

-mario

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-4.4 bisected: kwin5 stuck on kde5 loading screen with radeon
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A3C53E.9010908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A27508.4050701@gmail.com>

On 01/22/2016 07:29 PM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>
>
> On 01/22/2016 04:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:06:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Trimming KDE folks from Cc ]
>>>
>>> On 21.01.2016 19:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:36:46PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>>> On 21.01.2016 16:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please point me at the vblank on/off jump bug please?
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIR I originally reported it in response to
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-August/087841.html
>>>>>
>>>>> , but I can't find that in the archives, so maybe that was just on
>>>>> IRC.
>>>>> See
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-January/099122.html
>>>>>
>>>>> . Basically, I ran into the bug fixed by your patch because the
>>>>> counter
>>>>> jumped forward on every DPMS off, so it hit the 32-bit boundary after
>>>>> just a few days.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so just uncovered the overflow bug.
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by "just", but to be clear: The drm_vblank_on/off
>>> counter jumping bug (similar to the bug this thread is about), which
>>> exposed the overflow bug, is still alive and kicking in 4.5. It seems
>>> to happen when turning off the CRTC:
>>>
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=218104694, diff=0, hw=916 hw_last=916
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] crtc 0: dist from vblank start 3
>>> [drm:drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos] crtc 0 : v 0x7
>>> p(2199,-45)@ 7304.307354 -> 7304.308006 [e 0 us, 0 rep]
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] crtc 0: dist from vblank start 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=218104694, diff=16776301, hw=1 hw_last=916
>>
>> Not sure what bug we're talking about here, but here the hw counter
>> clearly jumps backwards.
>>
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 1:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 2:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 3
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 3:
>>> current=0, diff=0, hw=0 hw_last=0
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 1
>>> [drm:drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos] crtc 0 : v 0x1 p(0,0)@
>>> 7304.317140 -> 7304.317140 [e 0 us, 0 rep]
>>> [drm:radeon_get_vblank_counter_kms] Query failed! stat 1
>>> [drm:drm_update_vblank_count] updating vblank count on crtc 0:
>>> current=234880995, diff=16777215, hw=0 hw_last=1
>>
>> Same here.
>>
>> These things just don't happen on i915 because drm_vblank_off() and
>> drm_vblank_on() are always called around the times when the hw counter
>> might get reset. Or at least that's how it should be.
>>
>
> Fwiw, testing the HD-57570 single display with my patch that uses
> drm_vblank_off/on() in the DPMS OFF/ON path of radeon-kms does show
> hardware counter reset to zero as expected, but no jumps of software
> vblank counter. So with that vblank_off/on placement it seems to work
> nicely here.
>
> -mario
>

I spoke too early. The jump doesn't happen when i change video modes - 
video resolution / refresh rate etc, despite hw counter reset. But if i 
just disable and then reenable a display, the software counter jumps.

-mario
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-23 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-15 10:34 linux-4.4 bisected: kwin5 stuck on kde5 loading screen with radeon Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-15 12:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-15 12:40   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-16  4:24   ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-16  4:24     ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-18 10:49     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-18 14:06       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-18 14:14         ` Christian König
2016-01-18 14:14           ` Christian König
2016-01-20 20:25       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-20 20:25         ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-20 20:32       ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-20 20:32         ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-21  3:43         ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  3:43           ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  5:31           ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-21  5:31             ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-21  6:38             ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  6:38               ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  6:41               ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  6:41                 ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  7:58                 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-21  7:58                   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-21  8:36                   ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21  8:36                     ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-21 10:09                     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-21 10:09                       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-22  3:06                       ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-22  3:06                         ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-22 15:18                         ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-22 15:18                           ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-22 18:29                           ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-22 18:29                             ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-23 18:23                             ` Mario Kleiner [this message]
2016-01-23 18:23                               ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25  4:15                           ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-25  4:15                             ` Michel Dänzer
2016-01-25 13:16                             ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 13:16                               ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 13:23                               ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-25 13:44                                 ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 13:44                                   ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 14:53                                   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-25 14:53                                     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-01-25 16:38                                     ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 18:51                                       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-25 18:51                                         ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-25 19:30                                         ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 19:30                                           ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 20:32                                           ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-25 20:32                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-25 21:42                                             ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 21:42                                               ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-25 22:05                                               ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-25 22:05                                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-21  8:28               ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-21  8:28                 ` Mario Kleiner
2016-01-21  9:15                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-21  9:15                   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A3C53E.9010908@gmail.com \
    --to=mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.