All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il (Sagi Grimberg)
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:47:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A8AE61.6070100@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453757017-13640-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>


> @@ -1187,15 +1194,20 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>
>   	if (kill) {
>   		blk_set_queue_dying(ns->queue);
> +		mb();
>
>   		/*
>   		 * The controller was shutdown first if we got here through
>   		 * device removal. The shutdown may requeue outstanding
>   		 * requests. These need to be aborted immediately so
>   		 * del_gendisk doesn't block indefinitely for their completion.
> +		 * The queue needs to be restarted to let pending requests
> +		 * fail.
>   		 */
>   		blk_mq_abort_requeue_list(ns->queue);
> +		__nvme_start_queue_locked(ns);

Why not making sure that all the pending requests are moved to
the requeue list before we even get here? call nvme_cancel_io on
pending requests which would either fail the requests (blk_queue_dying)
or move them to the requeue list?

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 72ef832..bdf148e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,10 @@ static int nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>   	struct nvme_command cmnd;
>   	int ret = BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
>
> +	if (unlikely(blk_queue_dying(req->q))) {
> +		blk_mq_end_request(req, -EIO);
> +		return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
> +	}

This is something we should try our best to move away from IMO...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 21:23 [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again Keith Busch
2016-01-25 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] NVMe: Fix io incapable return values Keith Busch
2016-01-26 16:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 18:11     ` Ming Lin
2016-01-27 11:19       ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-26 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] NVMe: Make surprise removal work again Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 23:59   ` Keith Busch
2016-01-27 11:47 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-01-27 14:19   ` Keith Busch
2016-01-28 14:48     ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-28 14:55       ` Keith Busch
2016-01-28 15:20         ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-01 15:01 ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 15:27   ` Busch, Keith
     [not found]   ` <B58D82457FDA0744A320A2FC5AC253B93D3D7E57@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
2016-02-02  1:17     ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02  2:41       ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02  5:29         ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A8AE61.6070100@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --to=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.