All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: axboe@kernel.dk (Jens Axboe)
Subject: dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:26:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A90BBF.3050407@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127181655.GB31802@redhat.com>

On 01/27/2016 11:16 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27 2016 at 12:51pm -0500,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2016 10:48 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, I _cannot_ get null_blk to come even close to your reported 1500K+
>>> IOPs on 2 "fast" systems I have access to.  Which arguments are you
>>> loading the null_blk module with?
>>>
>>> I've been using:
>>> modprobe null_blk gb=4 bs=4096 nr_devices=1 queue_mode=2 submit_queues=12
>>>
>>> On my 1 system is a 12 core single socket, single NUMA node with 12G of
>>> memory, I can only get ~500K read IOPs and ~85K write IOPs.
>>>
>>> On another much larger system with 72 cores and 4 NUMA nodes with 128G
>>> of memory, I can only get ~310K read IOPs and ~175K write IOPs.
>>
>> Look at the completion method (irqmode) and completion time
>> (completion_nsec).
>
> OK, I found that queue_mode=0 (bio-based) is _much_ faster than blk-mq
> (2, the default).  Improving to ~950K read IOPs and ~675K write IOPs (on
> the single numa node system).
>
> Default for irqmode is 1 (softirq).  2 (timer) yields poor results.  0
> (none) seems slightly slower than 1.
>
> And if I use completion_nsec=1 I can bump up to ~990K read IOPs.
>
> Seems the best, for IOPs, so far on this system is with:
> modprobe null_blk gb=4 bs=4096 nr_devices=1 queue_mode=0 irqmode=1 completion_nsec=1 submit_queues=4

That sounds a bit odd. queue_mode=0 will always be a bit faster, 
depending on how many threads, etc. But from 310K to 950K, that sounds 
very suspicious.

And 500K/85K read/write is very low. Just did a quickie on a 2 node box 
I have here, single thread performance with queue_mode=2 is around 
500K/500K read/write.

-- 
Jens Axboe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"keith.busch@intel.com" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:26:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A90BBF.3050407@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127181655.GB31802@redhat.com>

On 01/27/2016 11:16 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27 2016 at 12:51pm -0500,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2016 10:48 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, I _cannot_ get null_blk to come even close to your reported 1500K+
>>> IOPs on 2 "fast" systems I have access to.  Which arguments are you
>>> loading the null_blk module with?
>>>
>>> I've been using:
>>> modprobe null_blk gb=4 bs=4096 nr_devices=1 queue_mode=2 submit_queues=12
>>>
>>> On my 1 system is a 12 core single socket, single NUMA node with 12G of
>>> memory, I can only get ~500K read IOPs and ~85K write IOPs.
>>>
>>> On another much larger system with 72 cores and 4 NUMA nodes with 128G
>>> of memory, I can only get ~310K read IOPs and ~175K write IOPs.
>>
>> Look at the completion method (irqmode) and completion time
>> (completion_nsec).
>
> OK, I found that queue_mode=0 (bio-based) is _much_ faster than blk-mq
> (2, the default).  Improving to ~950K read IOPs and ~675K write IOPs (on
> the single numa node system).
>
> Default for irqmode is 1 (softirq).  2 (timer) yields poor results.  0
> (none) seems slightly slower than 1.
>
> And if I use completion_nsec=1 I can bump up to ~990K read IOPs.
>
> Seems the best, for IOPs, so far on this system is with:
> modprobe null_blk gb=4 bs=4096 nr_devices=1 queue_mode=0 irqmode=1 completion_nsec=1 submit_queues=4

That sounds a bit odd. queue_mode=0 will always be a bit faster, 
depending on how many threads, etc. But from 310K to 950K, that sounds 
very suspicious.

And 500K/85K read/write is very low. Just did a quickie on a 2 node box 
I have here, single thread performance with queue_mode=2 is around 
500K/500K read/write.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-18 12:04 dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-19 10:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-19 22:45   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-19 22:45     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-25 21:40     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-25 21:40       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-25 23:37       ` [dm-devel] " Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-25 23:37         ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-26 13:29         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 13:29           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 14:01           ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-26 14:47             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 14:47               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 14:56               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 14:56                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 15:27                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 15:27                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 15:57             ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-27 11:14           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 11:14             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 17:48             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 17:48               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 17:51               ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 17:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 18:16                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 18:16                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 18:26                   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2016-01-27 18:26                     ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 19:14                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 19:14                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 19:50                       ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 19:50                         ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 17:56               ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 17:56                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 18:42                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 18:42                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 19:49                   ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 19:49                     ` Jens Axboe
2016-01-27 20:45                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 20:45                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-29 23:35                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-29 23:35                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-30  8:52                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-30  8:52                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-30 19:12                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-30 19:12                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-01  6:46                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-01  6:46                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-03 18:04                         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-03 18:04                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-03 18:24                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-03 18:24                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-03 19:22                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-03 19:22                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04  6:54                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04  6:54                               ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04 13:54                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04 13:54                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04 13:58                                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04 13:58                                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04 14:09                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04 14:09                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04 14:32                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04 14:32                                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-04 14:44                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-04 14:44                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 15:13                                 ` [RFC PATCH] dm: fix excessive dm-mq context switching Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 15:13                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 18:05                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 18:05                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 19:19                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-05 19:19                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 15:41                                       ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 15:41                                         ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:07                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 16:07                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 16:42                                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:42                                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:37                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-07 16:37                                           ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-07 16:43                                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:43                                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:53                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 16:53                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 16:54                                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 16:54                                               ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 17:20                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-07 17:20                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-08 12:21                                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 12:21                                                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 14:34                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-08 14:34                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-09  7:50                                                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-09  7:50                                                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-09 14:55                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-09 14:55                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-09 15:32                                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-09 15:32                                                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-10  0:45                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-10  0:45                                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-11  1:50                                                         ` RCU-ified dm-mpath for testing/review Mike Snitzer
2016-02-11  3:35                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-11  3:35                                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-11 15:34                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-11 15:34                                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-12 15:18                                                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-12 15:18                                                               ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-12 15:26                                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-12 15:26                                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-12 16:04                                                                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-12 16:04                                                                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-12 18:00                                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-12 18:00                                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-02-15  6:47                                                                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-15  6:47                                                                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-01-26  1:49       ` [dm-devel] dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-26  1:49         ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-26 16:03       ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 16:03         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-26 16:44         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-26 16:44           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-27  2:09           ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27  2:09             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-01-27 11:10             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-27 11:10               ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-26 21:40         ` [dm-devel] " Benjamin Marzinski
2016-01-26 21:40           ` Benjamin Marzinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56A90BBF.3050407@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.