All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@memblaze.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Wenbo Wang <mail_weber_wang@163.com>,
	"Wenwei.Tao" <wenwei.tao@memblaze.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NVMe: do not touch sq door bell if nvmeq has been suspended
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:20:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B0E541.1000907@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202144648.GA10728@localhost.localdomain>


> We free the transfer buffers when a command is cancelled. The controller,
> however, may still own the command and may try to write to them. We
> have to fence the controller off from being able to do that, so we can't
> cancel inflight commands while the PCI device is still bus master enabled.
>
> In a perfect world, we could trust in disabling with NVMe registers,
> but sometimes we can't rely on that.

OK, I wasn't aware that we cannot rely on that.

So it looks like we cannot change the ordering. So this leaves us with
the need to guarantee that no queue_rq is inflight before we unmap.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il (Sagi Grimberg)
Subject: [PATCH] NVMe: do not touch sq door bell if nvmeq has been suspended
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:20:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B0E541.1000907@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202144648.GA10728@localhost.localdomain>


> We free the transfer buffers when a command is cancelled. The controller,
> however, may still own the command and may try to write to them. We
> have to fence the controller off from being able to do that, so we can't
> cancel inflight commands while the PCI device is still bus master enabled.
>
> In a perfect world, we could trust in disabling with NVMe registers,
> but sometimes we can't rely on that.

OK, I wasn't aware that we cannot rely on that.

So it looks like we cannot change the ordering. So this leaves us with
the need to guarantee that no queue_rq is inflight before we unmap.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-01 15:42 [PATCH] NVMe: do not touch sq door bell if nvmeq has been suspended Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 15:42 ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 15:59 ` Busch, Keith
2016-02-01 15:59   ` Busch, Keith
2016-02-01 16:17   ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 16:17     ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-01 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-01 16:54   ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-02  7:15   ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02 12:41     ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 12:41       ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 14:27       ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 14:27         ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 14:33         ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 14:33           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-02 14:46           ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 14:46             ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 17:20             ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-02-02 17:20               ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-03  0:49               ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-02 17:25     ` Keith Busch
2016-02-02 17:25       ` Keith Busch
2016-02-03  0:19       ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-03 14:41     ` Keith Busch
2016-02-03 14:41       ` Keith Busch
2016-02-03 16:35       ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-03 16:38         ` Keith Busch
2016-02-03 16:38           ` Keith Busch
2016-02-06 14:32           ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-07 13:41             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-07 13:41               ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 15:01             ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:01               ` Keith Busch
2016-02-09 11:22               ` Wenbo Wang
2016-02-09 22:55                 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-09 22:55                   ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B0E541.1000907@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --to=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mail_weber_wang@163.com \
    --cc=wenbo.wang@memblaze.com \
    --cc=wenwei.tao@memblaze.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.