* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-08 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tony, edubezval
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-omap, linux,
galak, ijc+devicetree, mark.rutland, Keerthy
The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
Correcting the thresholds for the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
+++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
@@ -825,3 +825,27 @@
status = "okay";
};
};
+
+&cpu_alert0 {
+ temperature = <90000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&cpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&gpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&core_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&dspeve_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&iva_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-08 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ, edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8,
Keerthy
The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
Correcting the thresholds for the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
---
Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
+++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
@@ -825,3 +825,27 @@
status = "okay";
};
};
+
+&cpu_alert0 {
+ temperature = <90000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&cpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&gpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&core_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&dspeve_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&iva_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-08 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
Correcting the thresholds for the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
---
Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
+++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
@@ -825,3 +825,27 @@
status = "okay";
};
};
+
+&cpu_alert0 {
+ temperature = <90000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&cpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&gpu_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&core_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&dspeve_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
+
+&iva_crit {
+ temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
+};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
@ 2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2016-02-09 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy
Cc: tony, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-omap,
linux, galak, ijc+devicetree, mark.rutland
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1384 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
Apart from the above:
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> @@ -825,3 +825,27 @@
> status = "okay";
> };
> };
> +
> +&cpu_alert0 {
> + temperature = <90000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&cpu_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&gpu_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&core_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&dspeve_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&iva_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2016-02-09 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
Apart from the above:
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> @@ -825,3 +825,27 @@
> status = "okay";
> };
> };
> +
> +&cpu_alert0 {
> + temperature = <90000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&cpu_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&gpu_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&core_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&dspeve_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
> +
> +&iva_crit {
> + temperature = <105000>; /* milliCelsius */
> +};
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160209/e62133ba/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
(?)
@ 2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-09 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz
Cc: tony, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-omap,
linux, galak, ijc+devicetree, mark.rutland
On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>
> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-09 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz
Cc: tony, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-omap,
linux, galak, ijc+devicetree, mark.rutland
On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>
> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-09 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>
> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-omap, linux, galak,
ijc+devicetree, mark.rutland
* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >
> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>
> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
cycle?
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8
* Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [160209 14:17]:
> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >
> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>
> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
cycle?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >
> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>
> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
cycle?
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
(?)
@ 2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-12 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?
personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-12 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?
personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-12 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?
personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
> >> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >> >>
> >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >> >>
> >> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> >> ===================================================================
> >> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
> >>
> >> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> >> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
> >
> > Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> > cycle?
>
> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
OK let's wait for that then.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, lkml, dt list,
linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg, Mark Rutland
* Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [160212 14:32]:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > * Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> [160209 14:17]:
> >> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >> >>
> >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >> >>
> >> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> >> ===================================================================
> >> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
> >>
> >> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> >> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
> >
> > Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> > cycle?
>
> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
OK let's wait for that then.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2016-02-12 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
> >> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
> >> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
> >> >>
> >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >> >>
> >> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
> >> >> ===================================================================
> >> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
> >> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
> >>
> >> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
> >> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
> >
> > Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> > cycle?
>
> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
OK let's wait for that then.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
(?)
@ 2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren, Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>
>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>
>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>> cycle?
>>
>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>
> OK let's wait for that then.
OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren, Nishanth Menon
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>
>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>
>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>> cycle?
>>
>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>
> OK let's wait for that then.
OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>
>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>
>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>> cycle?
>>
>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>
> OK let's wait for that then.
OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
(?)
@ 2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>
>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>> cycle?
>>>
>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>
>> OK let's wait for that then.
>
> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
temperatures.
this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
suggestion..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>
>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>> cycle?
>>>
>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>
>> OK let's wait for that then.
>
> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
temperatures.
this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
suggestion..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>
>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>
>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>> cycle?
>>>
>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>
>> OK let's wait for that then.
>
> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
temperatures.
this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
suggestion..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
(?)
@ 2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Monday 15 February 2016 09:19 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>>> cycle?
>>>>
>>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>>
>>> OK let's wait for that then.
>>
>> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
>
>
> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>
> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
> temperatures.
>
> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
> suggestion..
Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
with one dtsi?
Regards,
Keerthy
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On Monday 15 February 2016 09:19 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>>> cycle?
>>>>
>>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>>
>>> OK let's wait for that then.
>>
>> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
>
>
> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>
> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
> temperatures.
>
> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
> suggestion..
Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
with one dtsi?
Regards,
Keerthy
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Keerthy @ 2016-02-15 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Monday 15 February 2016 09:19 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 10:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Saturday 13 February 2016 04:11 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160212 14:32]:
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>>>> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>>>>>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>>>>> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>>>>>>>> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>>> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>>>>>>>> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>>>>>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
>>>>> cycle?
>>>>
>>>> personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
>>>> documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
>>>> patch should probably be followed IMHO.
>>>
>>> OK let's wait for that then.
>>
>> OK. I will send a v2 with better documentation.
>
>
>
> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>
> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
> temperatures.
>
> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
> suggestion..
Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
with one dtsi?
Regards,
Keerthy
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
(?)
@ 2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On 02/15/2016 10:13 AM, Keerthy wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>>
>> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
>> temperatures.
>>
>> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
>> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
>> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
>> suggestion..
>
> Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
> with one dtsi?
Why would we want to throttle earlier on customer platforms or other
boards using extended? at the very least -> if all upstream boards
have only commercial grade, then just introduce
am57xx-commercial-thermal.dtsi ..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keerthy, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Keerthy, Dmitry Lifshitz, linux-arm-kernel,
lkml, dt list, linux-omap, Russell King - ARM Linux, Kumar Gala,
ijc+devicetree, Mark Rutland
On 02/15/2016 10:13 AM, Keerthy wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>>
>> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
>> temperatures.
>>
>> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
>> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
>> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
>> suggestion..
>
> Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
> with one dtsi?
Why would we want to throttle earlier on customer platforms or other
boards using extended? at the very least -> if all upstream boards
have only commercial grade, then just introduce
am57xx-commercial-thermal.dtsi ..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
@ 2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2016-02-15 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/15/2016 10:13 AM, Keerthy wrote:
[...]
>>
>> This data is in the AM572x datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am5728.pdf
>>
>> Table 5-3 in the current version contains the maximum junction
>> temperatures.
>>
>> this indicates that there are "Commercial" and "extended" -> we may
>> need to introduce just 2 dtsis -> am57xx-commercial and
>> am57xx-extended and reuse those based on the part on the board. just a
>> suggestion..
>
> Or use the minimum of the 2 to be on the safer side if we have to deal
> with one dtsi?
Why would we want to throttle earlier on customer platforms or other
boards using extended? at the very least -> if all upstream boards
have only commercial grade, then just introduce
am57xx-commercial-thermal.dtsi ..
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-15 17:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 9:45 [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds Keerthy
2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
2016-02-08 9:45 ` Keerthy
2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
2016-02-09 22:09 ` Eduardo Valentin
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-09 22:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-12 22:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-12 22:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 4:27 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 15:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 16:13 ` Keerthy
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-02-15 17:25 ` Nishanth Menon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.