All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i'
@ 2015-10-29  7:54 Chen Qi
  2015-10-29  7:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen Qi @ 2015-10-29  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

The following changes since commit f787b688f2884ce3fa888b4041030538c7d2bf55:

  oeqa/utils/decorators: fix missing keyword arguments on decorators (2015-10-27 07:22:22 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib ChenQi/coreutils-uname
  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/coreutils-uname

Chen Qi (1):
  coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i'

 ...e-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb      |  1 +
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch

-- 
1.9.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i'
  2015-10-29  7:54 [PATCH 0/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i' Chen Qi
@ 2015-10-29  7:54 ` Chen Qi
  2016-03-15  7:02   ` ChenQi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen Qi @ 2015-10-29  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

This patch make `uname -p' and `uname -i' not reporting 'unknown'.
It refers a to Fedora's way to do this.

The coreutils upstream rejects to accept this patch, blaming the
'unknown' result to the kernel not providing enough information.
As on normal distros, `uname -p' and `uname -i' do not report 'unknown',
we refer to Fedora's patch to fix this problem.

Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
---
 ...e-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb      |  1 +
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c5f449f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+Upstream-Status: Rejected
+
+Subject: uname: report processor and hardware correctly
+
+This patch is rejected by coreutils upstream, but distros like debian and fedora
+uses this patch to make `uname -i' and `uname -p' to not report 'unknown'.
+
+Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
+---
+ src/uname.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/uname.c b/src/uname.c
+index 39bd28c..c84582d 100644
+--- a/src/uname.c
++++ b/src/uname.c
+@@ -299,13 +299,19 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
+ 
+   if (toprint & PRINT_PROCESSOR)
+     {
+-      char const *element = unknown;
++      char *element = unknown;
+ #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_ARCHITECTURE
+       {
+         static char processor[257];
+         if (0 <= sysinfo (SI_ARCHITECTURE, processor, sizeof processor))
+           element = processor;
+       }
++#else
++      {
++	static struct utsname u;
++	uname(&u);
++	element = u.machine;
++      }
+ #endif
+ #ifdef UNAME_PROCESSOR
+       if (element == unknown)
+@@ -343,7 +349,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
+ 
+   if (toprint & PRINT_HARDWARE_PLATFORM)
+     {
+-      char const *element = unknown;
++      char *element = unknown;
+ #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_PLATFORM
+       {
+         static char hardware_platform[257];
+@@ -361,6 +367,14 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
+           if (sysctl (mib, 2, hardware_platform, &s, 0, 0) >= 0)
+             element = hardware_platform;
+         }
++#else
++      {
++	static struct utsname u;
++	uname(&u);
++	element = u.machine;
++	if(strlen(element)==4 && element[0]=='i' && element[2]=='8' && element[3]=='6')
++	  element[1]='3';
++      }
+ #endif
+       if (! (toprint == UINT_MAX && element == unknown))
+         print_element (element);
+-- 
+1.9.1
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
index f042346..ae9c375 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/coreutils/${BP}.tar.xz;name=tarball \
            file://remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch \
            file://fix-selinux-flask.patch \
            file://0001-Unset-need_charset_alias-when-building-for-musl.patch \
+           file://0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch \
           "
 
 SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "40efdbce865d2458d8da0a9dcee7c16c"
-- 
1.9.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i'
  2015-10-29  7:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
@ 2016-03-15  7:02   ` ChenQi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ChenQi @ 2016-03-15  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

ping ...


On 10/29/2015 03:54 PM, Chen Qi wrote:
> This patch make `uname -p' and `uname -i' not reporting 'unknown'.
> It refers a to Fedora's way to do this.
>
> The coreutils upstream rejects to accept this patch, blaming the
> 'unknown' result to the kernel not providing enough information.
> As on normal distros, `uname -p' and `uname -i' do not report 'unknown',
> we refer to Fedora's patch to fix this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
>   ...e-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb      |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c5f449f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.24/0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +Upstream-Status: Rejected
> +
> +Subject: uname: report processor and hardware correctly
> +
> +This patch is rejected by coreutils upstream, but distros like debian and fedora
> +uses this patch to make `uname -i' and `uname -p' to not report 'unknown'.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> +---
> + src/uname.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> + 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/src/uname.c b/src/uname.c
> +index 39bd28c..c84582d 100644
> +--- a/src/uname.c
> ++++ b/src/uname.c
> +@@ -299,13 +299,19 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> +
> +   if (toprint & PRINT_PROCESSOR)
> +     {
> +-      char const *element = unknown;
> ++      char *element = unknown;
> + #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_ARCHITECTURE
> +       {
> +         static char processor[257];
> +         if (0 <= sysinfo (SI_ARCHITECTURE, processor, sizeof processor))
> +           element = processor;
> +       }
> ++#else
> ++      {
> ++	static struct utsname u;
> ++	uname(&u);
> ++	element = u.machine;
> ++      }
> + #endif
> + #ifdef UNAME_PROCESSOR
> +       if (element == unknown)
> +@@ -343,7 +349,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> +
> +   if (toprint & PRINT_HARDWARE_PLATFORM)
> +     {
> +-      char const *element = unknown;
> ++      char *element = unknown;
> + #if HAVE_SYSINFO && defined SI_PLATFORM
> +       {
> +         static char hardware_platform[257];
> +@@ -361,6 +367,14 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> +           if (sysctl (mib, 2, hardware_platform, &s, 0, 0) >= 0)
> +             element = hardware_platform;
> +         }
> ++#else
> ++      {
> ++	static struct utsname u;
> ++	uname(&u);
> ++	element = u.machine;
> ++	if(strlen(element)==4 && element[0]=='i' && element[2]=='8' && element[3]=='6')
> ++	  element[1]='3';
> ++      }
> + #endif
> +       if (! (toprint == UINT_MAX && element == unknown))
> +         print_element (element);
> +--
> +1.9.1
> +
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> index f042346..ae9c375 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.24.bb
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/coreutils/${BP}.tar.xz;name=tarball \
>              file://remove-usr-local-lib-from-m4.patch \
>              file://fix-selinux-flask.patch \
>              file://0001-Unset-need_charset_alias-when-building-for-musl.patch \
> +           file://0001-uname-report-processor-and-hardware-correctly.patch \
>             "
>   
>   SRC_URI[tarball.md5sum] = "40efdbce865d2458d8da0a9dcee7c16c"



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-15  7:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-29  7:54 [PATCH 0/1] coreutils: fix reporting 'unknown' by `uname -p' and `uname -i' Chen Qi
2015-10-29  7:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2016-03-15  7:02   ` ChenQi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.