[PATCH V2 1/2] pseries/eeh: Refactor the configure bridge RTAS tokens

[PATCH V2 1/2] pseries/eeh: Refactor the configure bridge RTAS tokens

[Russell Currey]

The RTAS calls configure-pe and configure-bridge perform the same
actions, however the former can skip configuration if unnecessary.  The
existing code treats them as different tokens even though only one will
ever be called.  Refactor this by making a single token that is assigned
during init.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-
Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index ac3ffd9..231b1df 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ static int ibm_read_slot_reset_state2;
 static int ibm_slot_error_detail;
 static int ibm_get_config_addr_info;
 static int ibm_get_config_addr_info2;
-static int ibm_configure_bridge;
 static int ibm_configure_pe;
 
 /*
@@ -81,7 +80,13 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
 	ibm_get_config_addr_info2	= rtas_token("ibm,get-config-addr-info2");
 	ibm_get_config_addr_info	= rtas_token("ibm,get-config-addr-info");
 	ibm_configure_pe		= rtas_token("ibm,configure-pe");
-	ibm_configure_bridge		= rtas_token("ibm,configure-bridge");
+
+	/*
+	 * configure-pe and configure-bridge perform the same actions, however
+	 * the former is preferred as it can skip configuration if unnecessary.
+	 */
+	if (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
+		ibm_configure_pe	= rtas_token("ibm,configure-bridge");
 
 	/*
 	 * Necessary sanity check. We needn't check "get-config-addr-info"
@@ -93,8 +98,7 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
 	    (ibm_read_slot_reset_state2 == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
 	     ibm_read_slot_reset_state == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)	||
 	    ibm_slot_error_detail == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE	||
-	    (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE		&&
-	     ibm_configure_bridge == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)) {
+	    ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
 		pr_info("EEH functionality not supported\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -621,18 +625,9 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
 	if (pe->addr)
 		config_addr = pe->addr;
 
-	/* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
-	if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
-		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
-				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
-				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
-	} else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
-		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
-				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
-				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
-	} else {
-		return -EFAULT;
-	}
+	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
+			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
+			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
 
 	if (ret)
 		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Russell Currey]

In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
know about this, and respecting it fixes some PCI failures when the
hypervisor is busy.

The delay is capped at 0.2 seconds.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-
Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
---
V2: Use rtas_busy_delay and the new ibm_configure_pe token, refactoring
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
index 231b1df..c442b11 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
@@ -619,20 +619,43 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
 {
 	int config_addr;
 	int ret;
+	/* Waiting 0.2s maximum before skipping configuration */
+	int max_wait = 200;
+	int mwait;
 
 	/* Figure out the PE address */
 	config_addr = pe->config_addr;
 	if (pe->addr)
 		config_addr = pe->addr;
 
-	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
-			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
-			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
+	while (max_wait > 0) {
+		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
+				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
+				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
 
-	if (ret)
-		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
-			__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
+		/*
+		 * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5 milliseconds
+		 * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long.  Only respect
+		 * the delay if it's 100ms or less.
+		 */
 
+		switch (ret) {
+		case 0:
+			return ret;
+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+1:
+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
+			mwait = rtas_busy_delay(ret);
+			break;
+		default:
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		max_wait -= mwait;
+	}
+err:
+	pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
+		__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Gavin Shan]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:51PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
>In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
>that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
>should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
>milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
>know about this, and respecting it fixes some PCI failures when the
>hypervisor is busy.
>
>The delay is capped at 0.2 seconds.
>

When talking about RTAS calls, it might be better to have their full
names defined in PAPR spec. So I guess it'd better to replace configure_pe
and configure_bridge with their corresponding full RTAS call names:
"ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-bridge".

>Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-

I think it would be #3.10+.

>Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
>---
>V2: Use rtas_busy_delay and the new ibm_configure_pe token, refactoring
>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>index 231b1df..c442b11 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>@@ -619,20 +619,43 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> {
> 	int config_addr;
> 	int ret;
>+	/* Waiting 0.2s maximum before skipping configuration */
>+	int max_wait = 200;
>+	int mwait;
> 
> 	/* Figure out the PE address */
> 	config_addr = pe->config_addr;
> 	if (pe->addr)
> 		config_addr = pe->addr;
> 
>-	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>-			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>-			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>+	while (max_wait > 0) {
>+		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>+				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>+				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> 
>-	if (ret)
>-		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
>-			__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
>+		/*
>+		 * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5 milliseconds
>+		 * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long.  Only respect
>+		 * the delay if it's 100ms or less.
>+		 */
> 

The PAPR spec states that the delay can be up to 10^5ms. The spec also suggests
the maximal delay is 10^2. I guess it's worthy to mention it in the above comments
if you like.

>+		switch (ret) {
>+		case 0:
>+			return ret;
>+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
>+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+1:
>+		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
>+			mwait = rtas_busy_delay(ret);
>+			break;
>+		default:
>+			goto err;
>+		}
>+
>+		max_wait -= mwait;

If you like, the block can be simplified to as below. In that case,
tag #err isn't needed.

                if (!ret)
                        return ret;

                max_wait -= rtas_busy_delay(ret);

>+	}
>+err:
>+	pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
>+		__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
> 	return ret;
> }
> 

Thanks,
Gavin

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Russell Currey]

On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 20:49 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:51PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
> > 
> > In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
> > that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
> > should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
> > milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
> > know about this, and respecting it fixes some PCI failures when the
> > hypervisor is busy.
> > 
> > The delay is capped at 0.2 seconds.
> > 
> When talking about RTAS calls, it might be better to have their full
> names defined in PAPR spec. So I guess it'd better to replace
> configure_pe
> and configure_bridge with their corresponding full RTAS call names:
> "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-bridge".
Makes sense, will do.
> 
> > 
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-
> I think it would be #3.10+.
> 
<snip>
> > +		/*
> > +		 * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5
> > milliseconds
> > +		 * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long.  Only
> > respect
> > +		 * the delay if it's 100ms or less.
> > +		 */
> > 
> The PAPR spec states that the delay can be up to 10^5ms. The spec also
> suggests
> the maximal delay is 10^2. I guess it's worthy to mention it in the above
> comments
> if you like.

Yeah, I'll expand on that in the comment.
> 
> > 
> > +		switch (ret) {
> > +		case 0:
> > +			return ret;
> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+1:
> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
> > +			mwait = rtas_busy_delay(ret);
> > +			break;
> > +		default:
> > +			goto err;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		max_wait -= mwait;
> If you like, the block can be simplified to as below. In that case,
> tag #err isn't needed.
> 
>                 if (!ret)
>                         return ret;
> 
>                 max_wait -= rtas_busy_delay(ret);
> 
That doesn't catch the case where the return value is greater than
RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2, in which case we would be sleeping for at least
1 second.  However, I am going to change it so that any delay above 100ms
is just treated as if it was 100ms, so I can simplify the code there and
probably remove the switch and goto.

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Gavin Shan]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:01:17AM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
>On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 20:49 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:51PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
.../...

>> > 
>> > +		switch (ret) {
>> > +		case 0:
>> > +			return ret;
>> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
>> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+1:
>> > +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
>> > +			mwait = rtas_busy_delay(ret);
>> > +			break;
>> > +		default:
>> > +			goto err;
>> > +		}
>> > +
>> > +		max_wait -= mwait;
>> If you like, the block can be simplified to as below. In that case,
>> tag #err isn't needed.
>> 
>>                 if (!ret)
>>                         return ret;
>> 
>>                 max_wait -= rtas_busy_delay(ret);
>> 
>That doesn't catch the case where the return value is greater than
>RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2, in which case we would be sleeping for at least
>1 second.  However, I am going to change it so that any delay above 100ms
>is just treated as if it was 100ms, so I can simplify the code there and
>probably remove the switch and goto.
>

Yeah, we need update @max_wait and check it in advance. The point
is to remove the tag and simplify the switch block if you want, but
it's not a big deal:

		max_wait -= rtas_busy_delay_time(ret)
		if (ret <= 0 || max_wait < 0)
			return ret;

		rtas_busy_delay(ret);

Thanks,
Gavin

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Tyrel Datwyler]

On 03/28/2016 07:51 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
> In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
> that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
> should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
> milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
> know about this, and respecting it fixes some PCI failures when the
> hypervisor is busy.
> 
> The delay is capped at 0.2 seconds.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-
> Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
> ---
> V2: Use rtas_busy_delay and the new ibm_configure_pe token, refactoring
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> index 231b1df..c442b11 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> @@ -619,20 +619,43 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
>  {
>  	int config_addr;
>  	int ret;
> +	/* Waiting 0.2s maximum before skipping configuration */
> +	int max_wait = 200;
> +	int mwait;
>  
>  	/* Figure out the PE address */
>  	config_addr = pe->config_addr;
>  	if (pe->addr)
>  		config_addr = pe->addr;
>  
> -	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> -			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> -			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> +	while (max_wait > 0) {
> +		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> +				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> +				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>  
> -	if (ret)
> -		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
> -			__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
> +		/*
> +		 * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5 milliseconds
> +		 * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long.  Only respect
> +		 * the delay if it's 100ms or less.
> +		 */

Your changelog says the delay is capped at 0.2s. However, your comment
in the code mentions the full 10^5ms based on the 9900-9905 codes. It
would probably be best to expand you comment to mention in the code that
you are only handling 9900-9902 to eliminate the confusion of looking at
the above comment vs below implementation.

Further, despite PAPRs software note that the long busy should be
limited to 9900-9902 you might want to add a catch to your switch to log
any unexpected 9903-9905 or just treat them as max 0.2s delay. Firmware
has been know to do things on occasion that the spec says it shouldn't,
and it might not be obvious at first should you receive one of the
longer delay codes why we are going down the error path.

-Tyrel

>  
> +		switch (ret) {
> +		case 0:
> +			return ret;
> +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
> +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+1:
> +		case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
> +			mwait = rtas_busy_delay(ret);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		max_wait -= mwait;
> +	}
> +err:
> +	pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
> +		__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge

[Russell Currey]

On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 08:51 -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 07:51 PM, Russell Currey wrote:
> > +		/*
> > +		 * RTAS can return a delay value of up to 10^5
> > milliseconds
> > +		 * (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is too long.  Only
> > respect
> > +		 * the delay if it's 100ms or less.
> > +		 */
> Your changelog says the delay is capped at 0.2s. However, your comment
> in the code mentions the full 10^5ms based on the 9900-9905 codes. It
> would probably be best to expand you comment to mention in the code that
> you are only handling 9900-9902 to eliminate the confusion of looking at
> the above comment vs below implementation.
> 
> Further, despite PAPRs software note that the long busy should be
> limited to 9900-9902 you might want to add a catch to your switch to log
> any unexpected 9903-9905 or just treat them as max 0.2s delay. Firmware
> has been know to do things on occasion that the spec says it shouldn't,
> and it might not be obvious at first should you receive one of the
> longer delay codes why we are going down the error path.
> 
> -Tyrel

Good to know, thanks.  I'll respin.

- Russell

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] pseries/eeh: Refactor the configure bridge RTAS tokens

[Gavin Shan]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:50PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
>The RTAS calls configure-pe and configure-bridge perform the same
>actions, however the former can skip configuration if unnecessary.  The
>existing code treats them as different tokens even though only one will
>ever be called.  Refactor this by making a single token that is assigned
>during init.
>
>Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-
>Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>index ac3ffd9..231b1df 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
>@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ static int ibm_read_slot_reset_state2;
> static int ibm_slot_error_detail;
> static int ibm_get_config_addr_info;
> static int ibm_get_config_addr_info2;
>-static int ibm_configure_bridge;
> static int ibm_configure_pe;
> 
> /*
>@@ -81,7 +80,13 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
> 	ibm_get_config_addr_info2	= rtas_token("ibm,get-config-addr-info2");
> 	ibm_get_config_addr_info	= rtas_token("ibm,get-config-addr-info");
> 	ibm_configure_pe		= rtas_token("ibm,configure-pe");
>-	ibm_configure_bridge		= rtas_token("ibm,configure-bridge");
>+
>+	/*
>+	 * configure-pe and configure-bridge perform the same actions, however
>+	 * the former is preferred as it can skip configuration if unnecessary.
>+	 */
>+	if (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
>+		ibm_configure_pe	= rtas_token("ibm,configure-bridge");
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Necessary sanity check. We needn't check "get-config-addr-info"
>@@ -93,8 +98,7 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
> 	    (ibm_read_slot_reset_state2 == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
> 	     ibm_read_slot_reset_state == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)	||
> 	    ibm_slot_error_detail == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE	||
>-	    (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE		&&
>-	     ibm_configure_bridge == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)) {
>+	    ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> 		pr_info("EEH functionality not supported\n");
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}

Since you're here, you can do similar thing to @ibm_read_slot_reset_state
and @ibm_read_slot_reset_state?

>@@ -621,18 +625,9 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> 	if (pe->addr)
> 		config_addr = pe->addr;
> 
>-	/* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
>-	if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>-		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>-				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>-				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>-	} else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>-		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
>-				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>-				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>-	} else {
>-		return -EFAULT;
>-	}
>+	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>+			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>+			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> 

Russell, it seems not working if "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-bridge" are all
missed from "/rtas". Also, I don't think we need backport it to 3.10+ as it's not fixing
any bugs if I'm correct enough.

Thanks,
Gavin


> 	if (ret)
> 		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
>-- 
>2.7.4
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] pseries/eeh: Refactor the configure bridge RTAS tokens

[Russell Currey]

On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 16:26 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:50PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
<snip>
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Necessary sanity check. We needn't check "get-config-addr-info"
> > @@ -93,8 +98,7 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
> > 	    (ibm_read_slot_reset_state2 == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
> > 	     ibm_read_slot_reset_state == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)	||
> > 	    ibm_slot_error_detail == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE	||
> > -	    (ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE		&
> > &
> > -	     ibm_configure_bridge == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)) {
> > +	    ibm_configure_pe == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> > 		pr_info("EEH functionality not supported\n");
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> > 	}
> Since you're here, you can do similar thing to @ibm_read_slot_reset_state
> and @ibm_read_slot_reset_state?

Ah, didn't notice there was a similar thing going on there.  Will fix.
> 
> > 
> > @@ -621,18 +625,9 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct
> > eeh_pe *pe)
> > 	if (pe->addr)
> > 		config_addr = pe->addr;
> > 
> > -	/* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
> > -	if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> > -		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> > -				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > -	} else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> > -		ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
> > -				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > -	} else {
> > -		return -EFAULT;
> > -	}
> > +	ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> > +			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> > +			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> > 
> Russell, it seems not working if "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure-
> bridge" are all
> missed from "/rtas".

If they're both missing, then the init should fail as ibm_configure_pe will
be RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE, so this code should never be called.

>  Also, I don't think we need backport it to 3.10+ as it's not fixing
> any bugs if I'm correct enough.

This patch doesn't, but the second patch does.

> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 
> 
> > 
> > 	if (ret)
> > 		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x
> > (%d)\n",

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] pseries/eeh: Refactor the configure bridge RTAS tokens

[Gavin Shan]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:53:19PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
>On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 16:26 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:51:50PM +1000, Russell Currey wrote:
><snip>
>> > 	/*
>> > 	 * Necessary sanity check. We needn't check "get-config-addr-info"
>> > @@ -93,8 +98,7 @@ static int pseries_eeh_init(void)
>> > 	=A0=A0=A0=A0(ibm_read_slot_reset_state2 =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE=
 &&
>> > 	=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0ibm_read_slot_reset_state =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVIC=
E)	||
>> > 	=A0=A0=A0=A0ibm_slot_error_detail =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE	||
>> > -	=A0=A0=A0=A0(ibm_configure_pe =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE		&
>> > &
>> > -	=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0ibm_configure_bridge =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)) =
{
>> > +	=A0=A0=A0=A0ibm_configure_pe =3D=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>> > 		pr_info("EEH functionality not supported\n");
>> > 		return -EINVAL;
>> > 	}
>> Since you're here, you can do similar thing to @ibm_read_slot_reset_st=
ate
>> and @ibm_read_slot_reset_state?
>
>Ah, didn't notice there was a similar thing going on there. =A0Will fix.

Ok.

>>=20
>> >=20
>> > @@ -621,18 +625,9 @@ static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct
>> > eeh_pe *pe)
>> > 	if (pe->addr)
>> > 		config_addr =3D pe->addr;
>> >=20
>> > -	/* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
>> > -	if (ibm_configure_pe !=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>> > -		ret =3D rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>> > -				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>> > -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>> > -	} else if (ibm_configure_bridge !=3D RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>> > -		ret =3D rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
>> > -				config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>> > -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>> > -	} else {
>> > -		return -EFAULT;
>> > -	}
>> > +	ret =3D rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
>> > +			config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
>> > +			BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
>> >=20
>> Russell, it seems not working if "ibm,configure-pe" and "ibm,configure=
-
>> bridge" are all
>> missed from "/rtas".
>
>If they're both missing, then the init should fail as=A0ibm_configure_pe=
 will
>be RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE, so this code should never be called.
>

Yeah, I missed the point, thanks.

>>  Also, I don't think we need backport it to 3.10+ as it's not fixing
>> any bugs if I'm correct enough.
>
>This patch doesn't, but the second patch does.
>

Ok. In the commit log of this patch, you have something like below and th=
at
means it needs by stable kernels. I agree the next one is needed by stabl=
e
kernels, so the two patches would have inversed order if you agree. In th=
at
case, the next one (to be in stable kernels) won't depend on current on w=
hich
isn't required by stable kernels.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10-   <<< The format would be 3.10+

Thanks,
Gavin

>> >=20
>> > 	if (ret)
>> > 		pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x
>> > (%d)\n",
>