All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
	charles.chenxin@huawei.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:33:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718BA81.2070704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd7eNH546ZUhzkt30Xi_jFpHMn+seLQXLhuvbwC+g7bsA@mail.gmail.com>

在 2016/4/20 21:04, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> This patch converts device node to fwnode for dwapb driver, so
>> as to provide a unified fwnode for DT and ACPI bindings.
>>
>> Tested-by: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c                | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c       |  2 +-
>>  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> index 772d743..92bc204 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> @@ -290,14 +291,14 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>                                  struct dwapb_port_property *pp)
>>  {
>>         struct gpio_chip *gc = &port->gc;
>> -       struct device_node *node = pp->node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle  *fwnode = pp->fwnode;
>>         struct irq_chip_generic *irq_gc = NULL;
>>         unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
>>         struct irq_chip_type *ct;
>>         int err, i;
>>
>> -       gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, ngpio,
>> -                                            &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>> +       gpio->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, ngpio,
>> +                                                &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>>         if (!gpio->domain)
>>                 return;
>>
>> @@ -415,7 +416,8 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>         }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>> -       port->gc.of_node = pp->node;
>> +       port->gc.of_node = is_of_node(pp->fwnode) ?
>> +               to_of_node(pp->fwnode) : NULL;
> 
> Someone commented on this that it's simple
> …of_node = to_of_node(…);
>
Yes, the to_of_node() function has checked as like above, as follow:

static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
	return is_of_node(fwnode) ?
		container_of(fwnode, struct device_node, fwnode) : NULL;
}

Next version, I will fixed it.

>>  #endif
>>         port->gc.ngpio = pp->ngpio;
>>         port->gc.base = pp->gpio_base;
>> @@ -447,19 +449,15 @@ static void dwapb_gpio_unregister(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
>>  }
>>
>>  static struct dwapb_platform_data *
>> -dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>> +dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>> -       struct device_node *node, *port_np;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata;
>>         struct dwapb_port_property *pp;
>>         int nports;
>>         int i;
>>
>> -       node = dev->of_node;
>> -       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
>> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> -
>> -       nports = of_get_child_count(node);
>> +       nports = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
>>         if (nports == 0)
>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> @@ -474,18 +472,18 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>         pdata->nports = nports;
>>
>>         i = 0;
>> -       for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
>> +       device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode)  {
>>                 pp = &pdata->properties[i++];
>> -               pp->node = port_np;
>> +               pp->fwnode = fwnode;
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>>                     pp->idx >= DWAPB_MAX_PORTS) {
>>                         dev_err(dev,
>>                                 "missing/invalid port index for port%d\n", i);
>>                         return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>                 }
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "snps,nr-gpios",
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "snps,nr-gpios",
>>                                          &pp->ngpio)) {
>>                         dev_info(dev,
>>                                  "failed to get number of gpios for port%d\n",
>> @@ -497,9 +495,10 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>                  * Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of
>>                  * the IP.
>>                  */
>> -               if (pp->idx == 0 &&
>> -                   of_property_read_bool(port_np, "interrupt-controller")) {
>> -                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(port_np, 0);
>> +               if (dev->of_node && pp->idx == 0 &&
>> +                       fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode,
>> +                                                 "interrupt-controller")) {
>> +                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(to_of_node(fwnode), 0);
>>                         if (!pp->irq)
>>                                 dev_warn(dev, "no irq for port%d\n", pp->idx);
>>                 }
>> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>>
>>         if (!pdata) {
>> -               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(dev);
>> +               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(dev);
>>                 if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>>                         return PTR_ERR(pdata);
>>         }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> index a4ef99b..a24b35f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         /* Set the properties for portA */
>> -       pdata->properties->node         = NULL;
>> +       pdata->properties->fwnode       = NULL;
>>         pdata->properties->idx          = 0;
>>         pdata->properties->ngpio        = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
>>         pdata->properties->gpio_base    = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> index 955b579..2dc7f4a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>>  #define GPIO_DW_APB_H
>>
>>  struct dwapb_port_property {
>> -       struct device_node *node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         unsigned int    idx;
>>         unsigned int    ngpio;
>>         unsigned int    gpio_base;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Alan Tull" <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>, <charles.chenxin@huawei.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:33:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718BA81.2070704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd7eNH546ZUhzkt30Xi_jFpHMn+seLQXLhuvbwC+g7bsA@mail.gmail.com>

在 2016/4/20 21:04, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> This patch converts device node to fwnode for dwapb driver, so
>> as to provide a unified fwnode for DT and ACPI bindings.
>>
>> Tested-by: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c                | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c       |  2 +-
>>  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> index 772d743..92bc204 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> @@ -290,14 +291,14 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>                                  struct dwapb_port_property *pp)
>>  {
>>         struct gpio_chip *gc = &port->gc;
>> -       struct device_node *node = pp->node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle  *fwnode = pp->fwnode;
>>         struct irq_chip_generic *irq_gc = NULL;
>>         unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
>>         struct irq_chip_type *ct;
>>         int err, i;
>>
>> -       gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, ngpio,
>> -                                            &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>> +       gpio->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, ngpio,
>> +                                                &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>>         if (!gpio->domain)
>>                 return;
>>
>> @@ -415,7 +416,8 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>         }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>> -       port->gc.of_node = pp->node;
>> +       port->gc.of_node = is_of_node(pp->fwnode) ?
>> +               to_of_node(pp->fwnode) : NULL;
> 
> Someone commented on this that it's simple
> …of_node = to_of_node(…);
>
Yes, the to_of_node() function has checked as like above, as follow:

static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
	return is_of_node(fwnode) ?
		container_of(fwnode, struct device_node, fwnode) : NULL;
}

Next version, I will fixed it.

>>  #endif
>>         port->gc.ngpio = pp->ngpio;
>>         port->gc.base = pp->gpio_base;
>> @@ -447,19 +449,15 @@ static void dwapb_gpio_unregister(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
>>  }
>>
>>  static struct dwapb_platform_data *
>> -dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>> +dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>> -       struct device_node *node, *port_np;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata;
>>         struct dwapb_port_property *pp;
>>         int nports;
>>         int i;
>>
>> -       node = dev->of_node;
>> -       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
>> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> -
>> -       nports = of_get_child_count(node);
>> +       nports = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
>>         if (nports == 0)
>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> @@ -474,18 +472,18 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>         pdata->nports = nports;
>>
>>         i = 0;
>> -       for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
>> +       device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode)  {
>>                 pp = &pdata->properties[i++];
>> -               pp->node = port_np;
>> +               pp->fwnode = fwnode;
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>>                     pp->idx >= DWAPB_MAX_PORTS) {
>>                         dev_err(dev,
>>                                 "missing/invalid port index for port%d\n", i);
>>                         return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>                 }
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "snps,nr-gpios",
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "snps,nr-gpios",
>>                                          &pp->ngpio)) {
>>                         dev_info(dev,
>>                                  "failed to get number of gpios for port%d\n",
>> @@ -497,9 +495,10 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>                  * Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of
>>                  * the IP.
>>                  */
>> -               if (pp->idx == 0 &&
>> -                   of_property_read_bool(port_np, "interrupt-controller")) {
>> -                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(port_np, 0);
>> +               if (dev->of_node && pp->idx == 0 &&
>> +                       fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode,
>> +                                                 "interrupt-controller")) {
>> +                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(to_of_node(fwnode), 0);
>>                         if (!pp->irq)
>>                                 dev_warn(dev, "no irq for port%d\n", pp->idx);
>>                 }
>> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>>
>>         if (!pdata) {
>> -               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(dev);
>> +               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(dev);
>>                 if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>>                         return PTR_ERR(pdata);
>>         }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> index a4ef99b..a24b35f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         /* Set the properties for portA */
>> -       pdata->properties->node         = NULL;
>> +       pdata->properties->fwnode       = NULL;
>>         pdata->properties->idx          = 0;
>>         pdata->properties->ngpio        = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
>>         pdata->properties->gpio_base    = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> index 955b579..2dc7f4a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>>  #define GPIO_DW_APB_H
>>
>>  struct dwapb_port_property {
>> -       struct device_node *node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         unsigned int    idx;
>>         unsigned int    ngpio;
>>         unsigned int    gpio_base;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20  7:13 [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13 ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] gpio: dwapb: remove name from dwapb_port_property Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13   ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-29  9:21   ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13   ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-20 13:04     ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-21 11:33     ` Jiang Qiu [this message]
2016-04-21 11:33       ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13   ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:06 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-20 16:10   ` Alan Tull
2016-04-21 11:43     ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-21 11:43       ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-21 11:42   ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-21 11:42     ` Jiang Qiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5718BA81.2070704@huawei.com \
    --to=qiujiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \
    --cc=delicious.quinoa@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.