All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	aarcange@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:57:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57195ADF.6080808@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1604210200430.5164@eggly.anvils>

On 4/21/2016 2:15 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Shi, Yang wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I didn't realize pmd_* functions are protected by CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> on the most architectures before I made this change.
>>
>> Before I fix all the affected architectures code, I want to check if you guys
>> think this change is worth or not?
>
> Thanks for asking: no, it is not worthwhile.
>
> I would much prefer not to have to consider these trivial cleanups
> in the huge memory area at this time.  Kirill and I have urgent work
> to do in this area, and coping with patch conflicts between different
> versions of the source will not help any of us.

Thanks for your suggestion. I would consider to put such cleanup work on 
the back burner.

Yang

>
> Thanks,
> Hugh
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
>>
>> On 4/20/2016 11:24 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> huge_pmd_set_accessed is only called by __handle_mm_fault from memory.c,
>>> move the definition to memory.c and make it static like create_huge_pmd and
>>> wp_huge_pmd.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/huge_mm.h |  4 ----
>>>    mm/huge_memory.c        | 23 -----------------------
>>>    mm/memory.c             | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index 7008623..c218ab7b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -8,10 +8,6 @@ extern int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct
>>> *mm,
>>>    extern int copy_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct
>>> *src_mm,
>>>    			 pmd_t *dst_pmd, pmd_t *src_pmd, unsigned long addr,
>>>    			 struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>>> -extern void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> -				  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> -				  unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> -				  pmd_t orig_pmd, int dirty);
>>>    extern int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    			       unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>    			       pmd_t orig_pmd);
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index fecbbc5..6c14cb6 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -1137,29 +1137,6 @@ out:
>>>    	return ret;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> -			   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> -			   unsigned long address,
>>> -			   pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t orig_pmd,
>>> -			   int dirty)
>>> -{
>>> -	spinlock_t *ptl;
>>> -	pmd_t entry;
>>> -	unsigned long haddr;
>>> -
>>> -	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>>> -	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, orig_pmd)))
>>> -		goto unlock;
>>> -
>>> -	entry = pmd_mkyoung(orig_pmd);
>>> -	haddr = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>>> -	if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vma, haddr, pmd, entry, dirty))
>>> -		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>>> -
>>> -unlock:
>>> -	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>    					struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    					unsigned long address,
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>> index 93897f2..6ced4eb 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>> @@ -3287,6 +3287,29 @@ static int wp_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> +				  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> +				  unsigned long address,
>>> +				  pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t orig_pmd,
>>> +				  int dirty)
>>> +{
>>> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
>>> +	pmd_t entry;
>>> +	unsigned long haddr;
>>> +
>>> +	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>>> +	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, orig_pmd)))
>>> +		goto unlock;
>>> +
>>> +	entry = pmd_mkyoung(orig_pmd);
>>> +	haddr = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>>> +	if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vma, haddr, pmd, entry, dirty))
>>> +		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>>> +
>>> +unlock:
>>> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /*
>>>     * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
>>>     * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	aarcange@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:57:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57195ADF.6080808@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1604210200430.5164@eggly.anvils>

On 4/21/2016 2:15 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Shi, Yang wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I didn't realize pmd_* functions are protected by CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> on the most architectures before I made this change.
>>
>> Before I fix all the affected architectures code, I want to check if you guys
>> think this change is worth or not?
>
> Thanks for asking: no, it is not worthwhile.
>
> I would much prefer not to have to consider these trivial cleanups
> in the huge memory area at this time.  Kirill and I have urgent work
> to do in this area, and coping with patch conflicts between different
> versions of the source will not help any of us.

Thanks for your suggestion. I would consider to put such cleanup work on 
the back burner.

Yang

>
> Thanks,
> Hugh
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
>>
>> On 4/20/2016 11:24 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> huge_pmd_set_accessed is only called by __handle_mm_fault from memory.c,
>>> move the definition to memory.c and make it static like create_huge_pmd and
>>> wp_huge_pmd.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/huge_mm.h |  4 ----
>>>    mm/huge_memory.c        | 23 -----------------------
>>>    mm/memory.c             | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index 7008623..c218ab7b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -8,10 +8,6 @@ extern int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct
>>> *mm,
>>>    extern int copy_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct
>>> *src_mm,
>>>    			 pmd_t *dst_pmd, pmd_t *src_pmd, unsigned long addr,
>>>    			 struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>>> -extern void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> -				  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> -				  unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> -				  pmd_t orig_pmd, int dirty);
>>>    extern int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    			       unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>    			       pmd_t orig_pmd);
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index fecbbc5..6c14cb6 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -1137,29 +1137,6 @@ out:
>>>    	return ret;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> -			   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> -			   unsigned long address,
>>> -			   pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t orig_pmd,
>>> -			   int dirty)
>>> -{
>>> -	spinlock_t *ptl;
>>> -	pmd_t entry;
>>> -	unsigned long haddr;
>>> -
>>> -	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>>> -	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, orig_pmd)))
>>> -		goto unlock;
>>> -
>>> -	entry = pmd_mkyoung(orig_pmd);
>>> -	haddr = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>>> -	if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vma, haddr, pmd, entry, dirty))
>>> -		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>>> -
>>> -unlock:
>>> -	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int do_huge_pmd_wp_page_fallback(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>    					struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    					unsigned long address,
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>> index 93897f2..6ced4eb 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>> @@ -3287,6 +3287,29 @@ static int wp_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
>>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static void huge_pmd_set_accessed(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> +				  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> +				  unsigned long address,
>>> +				  pmd_t *pmd, pmd_t orig_pmd,
>>> +				  int dirty)
>>> +{
>>> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
>>> +	pmd_t entry;
>>> +	unsigned long haddr;
>>> +
>>> +	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
>>> +	if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, orig_pmd)))
>>> +		goto unlock;
>>> +
>>> +	entry = pmd_mkyoung(orig_pmd);
>>> +	haddr = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>>> +	if (pmdp_set_access_flags(vma, haddr, pmd, entry, dirty))
>>> +		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
>>> +
>>> +unlock:
>>> +	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /*
>>>     * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
>>>     * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 18:24 [PATCH] mm: move huge_pmd_set_accessed out of huge_memory.c Yang Shi
2016-04-20 18:24 ` Yang Shi
2016-04-20 19:04 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 19:04   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 19:09 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 19:09   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 19:20 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 19:20   ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-20 21:00 ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-20 21:00   ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-21  7:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-21  7:30     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-21 22:56     ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-21 22:56       ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-22  9:48       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-22  9:48         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-04-29 18:09         ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-29 18:09           ` Shi, Yang
2016-04-21  9:15   ` Hugh Dickins
2016-04-21  9:15     ` Hugh Dickins
2016-04-21 22:57     ` Shi, Yang [this message]
2016-04-21 22:57       ` Shi, Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57195ADF.6080808@linaro.org \
    --to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.