All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus
@ 2016-04-22 14:54 Ian Jackson
  2016-04-22 17:08 ` Roger Pau Monne
  2016-04-22 17:13 ` Wei Liu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-04-22 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel
  Cc: Juergen Gross, Wei Liu, Stefano Stabellini, Anshul Makkar,
	Ian Jackson, David Vrabel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monne

It appears that no-one is looking at the output.  These have not had a
push to the tested output branch for at least 250 days (742 days in
the case of linux-linus!) and the reports don't seem to be generating
any bugfixing activity.

There is a plan to do some Xen testing in Zero-day but even if that
doesn't lead to anything we would still be just where we are now.

So drop these to save our test bandwith for more useful work.

Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
CC: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
CC: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>
---
 crontab |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crontab b/crontab
index 2cfad74..6ddc2b8 100755
--- a/crontab
+++ b/crontab
@@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ MAILTO=ian.jackson@citrix.com,ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com
 49		1	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES_ALWAYS=xen-unstable	./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
 0		*	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-smoke	./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
 4-59/30		*	* * *		cd testing.git &&				./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
-18		9	* * 1,3,5	cd testing.git && BRANCHES=linux-next		./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
 18		9	* * 3,7		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-coverity ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
-18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-mingo-tip-master linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
-6-59/15   	*	* * *		cd testing.git && EXTRA_BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-3.0 rumpuserxen libvirt' ./cr-for-branches bisects -w "./cr-try-bisect --real"
+18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
+6-59/15   	*	* * *		cd testing.git && EXTRA_BRANCHES='linux-3.0 rumpuserxen libvirt' ./cr-for-branches bisects -w "./cr-try-bisect --real"
 #8-59/5		*	* * *		cd bisects/adhoc.git &&	with-lock-ex -q data-tree-lock bash -c "./cr-try-bisect-adhoc; exit $?"
 22		8	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=maintjobs		./cr-for-branches . -w ./cr-all-branch-statuses ''
 3		4	* * *		savelog -c28 testing.git/tmp/cr-for-branches.log >/dev/null
-- 
1.7.10.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus
  2016-04-22 14:54 [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus Ian Jackson
@ 2016-04-22 17:08 ` Roger Pau Monne
  2016-04-27  4:37   ` Juergen Gross
  2016-04-22 17:13 ` Wei Liu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Roger Pau Monne @ 2016-04-22 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Jackson
  Cc: Juergen Gross, Wei Liu, Stefano Stabellini, Anshul Makkar,
	David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It appears that no-one is looking at the output.  These have not had a
> push to the tested output branch for at least 250 days (742 days in
> the case of linux-linus!) and the reports don't seem to be generating
> any bugfixing activity.
> 
> There is a plan to do some Xen testing in Zero-day but even if that
> doesn't lead to anything we would still be just where we are now.
> 
> So drop these to save our test bandwith for more useful work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> CC: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> CC: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>

This looks fine to me, but I think I needs to be Acked by the Linux 
maintainers. FWIW:

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

> ---
>  crontab |    5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/crontab b/crontab
> index 2cfad74..6ddc2b8 100755
> --- a/crontab
> +++ b/crontab
> @@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ MAILTO=ian.jackson@citrix.com,ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com
>  49		1	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES_ALWAYS=xen-unstable	./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>  0		*	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-smoke	./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>  4-59/30		*	* * *		cd testing.git &&				./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
> -18		9	* * 1,3,5	cd testing.git && BRANCHES=linux-next		./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>  18		9	* * 3,7		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-coverity ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
> -18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-mingo-tip-master linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
> -6-59/15   	*	* * *		cd testing.git && EXTRA_BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-3.0 rumpuserxen libvirt' ./cr-for-branches bisects -w "./cr-try-bisect --real"
> +18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"

Is this linux-3.0 branch actually Linux 3.0? Should we really be testing 
that? (It's quite old TBH, and it's not even maintained upstream, oldest 
longterm is 3.2).

Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus
  2016-04-22 14:54 [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus Ian Jackson
  2016-04-22 17:08 ` Roger Pau Monne
@ 2016-04-22 17:13 ` Wei Liu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2016-04-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Jackson
  Cc: Juergen Gross, Wei Liu, Stefano Stabellini, Anshul Makkar,
	David Vrabel, xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monne

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It appears that no-one is looking at the output.  These have not had a
> push to the tested output branch for at least 250 days (742 days in
> the case of linux-linus!) and the reports don't seem to be generating
> any bugfixing activity.
> 
> There is a plan to do some Xen testing in Zero-day but even if that
> doesn't lead to anything we would still be just where we are now.
> 
> So drop these to save our test bandwith for more useful work.
> 

Thanks for doing this!

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus
  2016-04-22 17:08 ` Roger Pau Monne
@ 2016-04-27  4:37   ` Juergen Gross
  2016-04-28 16:22     ` Ian Jackson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2016-04-27  4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roger Pau Monne, Ian Jackson
  Cc: Wei Liu, Stefano Stabellini, Anshul Makkar, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 22/04/16 19:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> It appears that no-one is looking at the output.  These have not had a
>> push to the tested output branch for at least 250 days (742 days in
>> the case of linux-linus!) and the reports don't seem to be generating
>> any bugfixing activity.
>>
>> There is a plan to do some Xen testing in Zero-day but even if that
>> doesn't lead to anything we would still be just where we are now.
>>
>> So drop these to save our test bandwith for more useful work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>> CC: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> CC: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>
> 
> This looks fine to me, but I think I needs to be Acked by the Linux 
> maintainers. FWIW:

Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

> 
> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> 
>> ---
>>  crontab |    5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/crontab b/crontab
>> index 2cfad74..6ddc2b8 100755
>> --- a/crontab
>> +++ b/crontab
>> @@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ MAILTO=ian.jackson@citrix.com,ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com
>>  49		1	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES_ALWAYS=xen-unstable	./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  0		*	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-smoke	./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  4-59/30		*	* * *		cd testing.git &&				./cr-for-branches branches -q "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -18		9	* * 1,3,5	cd testing.git && BRANCHES=linux-next		./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>>  18		9	* * 3,7		cd testing.git && BRANCHES=xen-unstable-coverity ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-mingo-tip-master linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
>> -6-59/15   	*	* * *		cd testing.git && EXTRA_BRANCHES='linux-linus linux-3.0 rumpuserxen libvirt' ./cr-for-branches bisects -w "./cr-try-bisect --real"
>> +18		4	* * *		cd testing.git && BRANCHES='linux-3.0 libvirt rumpuserxen' ./cr-for-branches branches -w "./cr-daily-branch --real"
> 
> Is this linux-3.0 branch actually Linux 3.0? Should we really be testing 
> that? (It's quite old TBH, and it's not even maintained upstream, oldest 
> longterm is 3.2).
> 
> Roger.
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus
  2016-04-27  4:37   ` Juergen Gross
@ 2016-04-28 16:22     ` Ian Jackson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2016-04-28 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross
  Cc: Wei Liu, Anshul Makkar, Stefano Stabellini, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky, Roger Pau Monne

Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus"):
> On 22/04/16 19:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > This looks fine to me, but I think I needs to be Acked by the Linux 
> > maintainers. FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Thanks.  I have installed this new crontab.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-28 16:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-22 14:54 [OSSTEST PATCH] crontab: Drop linux-mingo-tip-master linux-next linux-linus Ian Jackson
2016-04-22 17:08 ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-04-27  4:37   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-28 16:22     ` Ian Jackson
2016-04-22 17:13 ` Wei Liu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.